LA CARAVANA DE MUSTERS Y CASIMIRO. LA “CUESTIÓN TEHUELCHE” REVISITADA POR EL ANÁLISIS DE REDES. PUNTA ARENAS–CARMEN DE PATAGONES, 1869-70

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Julio Vezub
{"title":"LA CARAVANA DE MUSTERS Y CASIMIRO. LA “CUESTIÓN TEHUELCHE” REVISITADA POR EL ANÁLISIS DE REDES. PUNTA ARENAS–CARMEN DE PATAGONES, 1869-70","authors":"Julio Vezub","doi":"10.4067/S0718-22442015000100002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Durante 1869 y 1870 el oficial de la marina britanica George Ch. Musters recorrio 2.750 km desde el estrecho de Magallanes hasta el rio Negro, integrando una caravana que encabezaba el cacique Casimiro cuando la Patagonia era todavia un territorio autonomo. Mediante la sistematizacion de datos de la cronica de Musters, provisto de herramientas informaticas para la elaboracion de grafos, este articulo se dedica al analisis de las redes sociales que los actores tejieron durante el viaje. A partir de esta metodologia se ensaya una discusion critica de la etnologia culturalista y su refutacion parcial por los autores que consideraron la identidad etnica “tehuelche” como el fruto de la imposicion y la imaginacion coloniales. La hipotesis a confrontar es que la caravana de Casimiro puede comprenderse como un itinerario geografico, politico, parental, comercial y guerrero que delimita los sentidos historicos que asumio la identificacion tehuelche en el contexto de los procesos expansivos del colonialismo y los estados nacionales argentino y chileno. ABSTRACT During 1869 and 1870 British naval officer George Ch. Musters traveled 2,750 km from the Strait of Magellan to Rio Negro, as a member of a convoy headed by cacique Casimiro when Patagonia was still an autonomous territory. By systematizing data from Musters’ chronicle, and applying software for graphs, this article focuses on the analysis of social networks woven by these actors during the journey. Based on this methodology, the article poses a critical discussion of the culturalist anthropology and its refutation by authors who considered the ethnic identity of Tehuelches as an imposition of the colonialist imagination. The hypothesis is that Casimiro’s convoy can be understood as a geographical, political, kinship, business and warfare itinerary which was defining the historical meanings of the Tehuelcheidentification during the context of expansive processes of colonialism and nation states of Argentina and Chile.","PeriodicalId":45493,"journal":{"name":"Magallania","volume":"40 1","pages":"15-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magallania","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22442015000100002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Durante 1869 y 1870 el oficial de la marina britanica George Ch. Musters recorrio 2.750 km desde el estrecho de Magallanes hasta el rio Negro, integrando una caravana que encabezaba el cacique Casimiro cuando la Patagonia era todavia un territorio autonomo. Mediante la sistematizacion de datos de la cronica de Musters, provisto de herramientas informaticas para la elaboracion de grafos, este articulo se dedica al analisis de las redes sociales que los actores tejieron durante el viaje. A partir de esta metodologia se ensaya una discusion critica de la etnologia culturalista y su refutacion parcial por los autores que consideraron la identidad etnica “tehuelche” como el fruto de la imposicion y la imaginacion coloniales. La hipotesis a confrontar es que la caravana de Casimiro puede comprenderse como un itinerario geografico, politico, parental, comercial y guerrero que delimita los sentidos historicos que asumio la identificacion tehuelche en el contexto de los procesos expansivos del colonialismo y los estados nacionales argentino y chileno. ABSTRACT During 1869 and 1870 British naval officer George Ch. Musters traveled 2,750 km from the Strait of Magellan to Rio Negro, as a member of a convoy headed by cacique Casimiro when Patagonia was still an autonomous territory. By systematizing data from Musters’ chronicle, and applying software for graphs, this article focuses on the analysis of social networks woven by these actors during the journey. Based on this methodology, the article poses a critical discussion of the culturalist anthropology and its refutation by authors who considered the ethnic identity of Tehuelches as an imposition of the colonialist imagination. The hypothesis is that Casimiro’s convoy can be understood as a geographical, political, kinship, business and warfare itinerary which was defining the historical meanings of the Tehuelcheidentification during the context of expansive processes of colonialism and nation states of Argentina and Chile.
马斯特斯和卡西米罗的商队。通过网络分析重新审视“特胡切问题”。蓬塔阿雷纳斯-巴塔哥内斯的卡门,1869-70年
在1869年和1870年期间,英国海军军官乔治·Ch·马斯特斯(George Ch. Musters)从麦哲伦海峡(Magallanes strain)到里约热内卢Negro,在巴塔哥尼亚还是自治领土的时候,他加入了卡西米罗酋长(cacique Casimiro)率领的商队。通过将cronica de Musters的数据系统化,并提供计算机工具来制作图表,本文致力于分析参与者在旅行中编织的社交网络。本研究的目的是通过对“特胡埃尔切”民族身份的批判性分析,探讨特胡埃尔切民族身份是殖民强加和想象的结果。在这篇文章中,卡西米罗的商队可以被理解为一个地理、政治、父母、商业和战士的旅程,它定义了我在殖民主义扩张进程和阿根廷和智利民族国家的背景下对特胡埃尔什身份的历史意义。1869年至1870年间,英国海军军官乔治·Ch·马斯特斯(George Ch. Musters)作为卡西米罗(Casimiro)酋长率领的车队的一员,从麦哲伦海峡(Strait of Magellan)前往里约热内卢Negro,当时巴塔哥尼亚仍是一个自治领土。By systematizing data from Musters '纪事,and applying for graphs软件,这条的the analysis of social networks woven By这些行为during the journey。本文以这种方法为基础,对文化人类学进行了批判性的讨论,并提出了一些作者的反驳,他们认为特胡埃尔切人的民族身份是殖民主义想象的强加。假设是,卡西米罗的车队可以理解为地理、政治、亲属关系、商业和战争路线,在阿根廷和智利殖民主义和民族国家扩张进程的背景下,确定了tehuelcheidential的历史意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Magallania
Magallania ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: MAGALLANIA (Antigua serie Ciencias Humanas de Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia) the formerly called Social Science series of the Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Magallanes, has regularly published one volume yearly since 1970 and a volume with two numbers since 2005. Its main purpose is to publish original and unpublished work preferentially done by Universidad de Magallanes researchers, and associated academics (faculty) from other national and international institutions, in the Social Sciences and Humanities and on topics referred to Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego, Antarctic and adjoining islands, and the South-eastern Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信