Performance comparison of an irreversible closed Brayton cycle under maximum power density and maximum power conditions

Lingen Chen , Junlin Zheng , Fengrui Sun , Chih Wu
{"title":"Performance comparison of an irreversible closed Brayton cycle under maximum power density and maximum power conditions","authors":"Lingen Chen ,&nbsp;Junlin Zheng ,&nbsp;Fengrui Sun ,&nbsp;Chih Wu","doi":"10.1016/S1164-0235(02)00070-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, the power density, defined as the ratio of power output to the maximum specific volume in the cycle, is taken as objective for performance analysis of an irreversible closed Brayton cycle coupled to constant-temperature heat reservoirs in the viewpoint of finite time thermodynamics (FTT) or entropy generation minimization (EGM). The analytical formulas about the relations between power density and pressure ratio are derived with the heat resistance losses in the hot- and cold-side heat exchangers and the irreversible compression and expansion losses in the compressor and turbine. The obtained results are compared with those results obtained by using the maximum power criterion. The influences of some design parameters on the maximum power density are provided by numerical examples, and the advantages and disadvantages of maximum power density design are analyzed. The power plant design with maximum power density leads to a higher efficiency and smaller size. However, the maximum power density design requires a higher pressure ratio than maximum power design. When the heat transfer is carried out ideally, the results of this paper become those obtained in recent literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100518,"journal":{"name":"Exergy, An International Journal","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 345-351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1164-0235(02)00070-5","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exergy, An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164023502000705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

In this paper, the power density, defined as the ratio of power output to the maximum specific volume in the cycle, is taken as objective for performance analysis of an irreversible closed Brayton cycle coupled to constant-temperature heat reservoirs in the viewpoint of finite time thermodynamics (FTT) or entropy generation minimization (EGM). The analytical formulas about the relations between power density and pressure ratio are derived with the heat resistance losses in the hot- and cold-side heat exchangers and the irreversible compression and expansion losses in the compressor and turbine. The obtained results are compared with those results obtained by using the maximum power criterion. The influences of some design parameters on the maximum power density are provided by numerical examples, and the advantages and disadvantages of maximum power density design are analyzed. The power plant design with maximum power density leads to a higher efficiency and smaller size. However, the maximum power density design requires a higher pressure ratio than maximum power design. When the heat transfer is carried out ideally, the results of this paper become those obtained in recent literature.

最大功率密度和最大功率条件下不可逆闭合布雷顿循环的性能比较
本文从有限时间热力学(FTT)或熵产最小化(EGM)的角度出发,以功率密度为输出功率与循环中最大比容的比值,作为不可逆封闭Brayton循环耦合恒温蓄热器的性能分析目标。结合冷热侧换热器的热阻损失以及压气机和汽轮机的不可逆压缩和膨胀损失,推导了功率密度与压力比关系的解析公式。将所得结果与采用最大功率准则所得结果进行了比较。通过数值算例给出了一些设计参数对最大功率密度的影响,并分析了最大功率密度设计的优缺点。采用最大功率密度的动力装置设计,效率更高,体积更小。然而,最大功率密度设计需要比最大功率设计更高的压力比。在理想的换热条件下,本文的结果与最近文献的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信