Analysis of the effect of different chest drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic radical operation for lung cancer

Wu-hua Liu, Haitao Ma, Haitao Huang
{"title":"Analysis of the effect of different chest drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic radical operation for lung cancer","authors":"Wu-hua Liu, Haitao Ma, Haitao Huang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2019.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the effect of different thoracicdrainage methods afte single holethoracoscopicsurgery for lung cancer. \n \n \nMethods \n200 patents with lung cancer undergoing single holethoracoscopicsurgery were divided into two groups : group A and group B in the first affliliated Hospital of Suzhou University from April 2014 to December 2016. Group A: 100 patients with 30#single thoracic drainage tube after operation. Groupe B: 100 patients with 30#thoracic drainage tube plus a negative pressure drainage tube after operation. The amount of thoracic drainage tube , drainage time , postoperative chest puncture, postoperative pain, hospital stay and total costs of hospitalization were observed in both groups. \n \n \nResults \nThere was no difference in age, sex, pathological type and pulmonary lobectomy between the two groups. Total thoracic drainage[(1 007.4±512.95)ml vs.(982.35±359.93)ml]and totaltube time[(5.71±2.61)days vs.(5.43±1.91) days] had no significant difference between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the length of 30#thoracic drainage tube [(5.71±2.61)days vs.(2.9±0.61)days]between the two groups. The difference of hospitalization time[(12.05±2.93)days vs.(13.45±4.15)days]and hospitalization expenses[(63 376.47±1 615.82)yuan vs.(64 449.82±3 650.04)yuan]was statistically significant. The rate of rethoracotomy in gruop A was 7%, the rate of rethoracotomy in group B was 0, the comparison between the two groups was statistically significant. VAS pain scores were compared on the first day and the second day, there was no significant difference on the third day after operation. On the fifth day after operation, the difference was statistically significant. \n \n \nConclusion \nAdding a negative pressure drainage tube on the basis of using a single thoracoscopic drainage tube for radical resection of lung cancer after single hole thoracoscopic surgery will not increase postoperative pain of patients, significantly shorten postoperative hospitalization time, effectively control postoperativerethoracopunchure rate, thus effectively reduce postoperative hospitalization costs of patients. \n \n \nKey words: \nSingle hole Thoracoscopic Radical resection of lung cancer Thoracic drainage","PeriodicalId":10181,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","volume":"48 1","pages":"515-519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2019.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of different thoracicdrainage methods afte single holethoracoscopicsurgery for lung cancer. Methods 200 patents with lung cancer undergoing single holethoracoscopicsurgery were divided into two groups : group A and group B in the first affliliated Hospital of Suzhou University from April 2014 to December 2016. Group A: 100 patients with 30#single thoracic drainage tube after operation. Groupe B: 100 patients with 30#thoracic drainage tube plus a negative pressure drainage tube after operation. The amount of thoracic drainage tube , drainage time , postoperative chest puncture, postoperative pain, hospital stay and total costs of hospitalization were observed in both groups. Results There was no difference in age, sex, pathological type and pulmonary lobectomy between the two groups. Total thoracic drainage[(1 007.4±512.95)ml vs.(982.35±359.93)ml]and totaltube time[(5.71±2.61)days vs.(5.43±1.91) days] had no significant difference between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the length of 30#thoracic drainage tube [(5.71±2.61)days vs.(2.9±0.61)days]between the two groups. The difference of hospitalization time[(12.05±2.93)days vs.(13.45±4.15)days]and hospitalization expenses[(63 376.47±1 615.82)yuan vs.(64 449.82±3 650.04)yuan]was statistically significant. The rate of rethoracotomy in gruop A was 7%, the rate of rethoracotomy in group B was 0, the comparison between the two groups was statistically significant. VAS pain scores were compared on the first day and the second day, there was no significant difference on the third day after operation. On the fifth day after operation, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Adding a negative pressure drainage tube on the basis of using a single thoracoscopic drainage tube for radical resection of lung cancer after single hole thoracoscopic surgery will not increase postoperative pain of patients, significantly shorten postoperative hospitalization time, effectively control postoperativerethoracopunchure rate, thus effectively reduce postoperative hospitalization costs of patients. Key words: Single hole Thoracoscopic Radical resection of lung cancer Thoracic drainage
单门电视胸腔镜肺癌根治术后不同胸腔引流方式的效果分析
目的探讨肺癌单次胸腔镜手术后不同胸腔引流方式的效果。方法将2014年4月至2016年12月苏州大学第一附属医院行单次微创手术的肺癌患者200例分为A组和B组。A组:术后30#单胸引流管100例。B组:术后行30#胸腔引流管加负压引流管100例。观察两组患者胸腔引流管数量、引流时间、术后穿刺胸针、术后疼痛、住院时间及总住院费用。结果两组患者在年龄、性别、病理类型、肺叶切除等方面均无差异。两组胸腔总引流量[(1 007.4±512.95)ml vs(982.35±359.93)ml]和总管时间[(5.71±2.61)d vs(5.43±1.91)d]差异无统计学意义。两组患者30#胸段引流管长度差异有统计学意义[(5.71±2.61)d vs(2.9±0.61)d]。住院时间[(12.05±2.93)d vs(13.45±4.15)d]和住院费用[(63 376.47±1 615.82)元vs(64 449.82±3 650.04)元]差异有统计学意义。A组开胸率为7%,B组开胸率为0,两组比较有统计学意义。术后第1天与第2天比较VAS疼痛评分,术后第3天比较差异无统计学意义。术后第5天,差异有统计学意义。结论单孔胸腔镜手术后在使用单孔胸腔镜引流管的基础上增加负压引流管进行肺癌根治术,不会增加患者术后疼痛,显著缩短术后住院时间,有效控制术后胸腔镜开颅率,从而有效降低患者术后住院费用。关键词:单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术胸腔引流
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信