ESβL and MβL Production in Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated From HIV Seropositive Individuals

F. Adeyemi, Omotayo O. Oyedara, A. Wahab, S. Akinde
{"title":"ESβL and MβL Production in Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated From HIV Seropositive Individuals","authors":"F. Adeyemi, Omotayo O. Oyedara, A. Wahab, S. Akinde","doi":"10.34172/ajcmi.2023.3394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESβL) or metallo-β-lactamase (MβL) production by gram-negative bacteria in immunocompromised patients poses a serious therapeutic challenge for infection control and is associated with infections with a higher morbidity/mortality, especially in developing countries. This study aimed to phenotypically evaluate the production of ESβL as well as MβL in 75 gram-negative bacterial isolates from clinical samples of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive individuals. Methods: Bacterial identification was by chromogenic media, analytical profile index 20 E, and 20 NE kits, and ESβL production was tested by double-disc synergy test (DDST) and combination disc method, while MβL production was screened with imipenem ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) combined disc and EDTA-disc potentiation with ceftazidime. Results: Altogether, 57 isolates (76.0%) produced ESβL either with DDST (6), combination disc method (49), or both (2). DDST detected the ESβL enzyme in 10.7% of the tested isolates which were all Pseudomonas aeruginosa. None of the bacterial isolates revealed MβL production with the imipenem/imipenem-EDTA method, whereas 26.7% of tested isolates produced MβL with EDTA-disc potentiation using ceftazidime out of which 65.0% were P. aeruginosa. Moreover, ESβL/MβL co-production was evident in 22.7% of the tested bacterial isolates with P. aeruginosa constituting 64.7%. Conclusion: ESβL and MβL co-production among the studied isolates indicates a heightened resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, suggesting grave health consequences, especially in immunocompromised individuals with already limiting therapeutic options in the region. The study revealed higher ESβL production compared to MβL production in isolates, with the predominating producing specie being P. aeruginosa, and higher ESβL and MβL detection by the combination disc method and EDTA-disc potentiation using ceftazidime, respectively.","PeriodicalId":8689,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ajcmi.2023.3394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESβL) or metallo-β-lactamase (MβL) production by gram-negative bacteria in immunocompromised patients poses a serious therapeutic challenge for infection control and is associated with infections with a higher morbidity/mortality, especially in developing countries. This study aimed to phenotypically evaluate the production of ESβL as well as MβL in 75 gram-negative bacterial isolates from clinical samples of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive individuals. Methods: Bacterial identification was by chromogenic media, analytical profile index 20 E, and 20 NE kits, and ESβL production was tested by double-disc synergy test (DDST) and combination disc method, while MβL production was screened with imipenem ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) combined disc and EDTA-disc potentiation with ceftazidime. Results: Altogether, 57 isolates (76.0%) produced ESβL either with DDST (6), combination disc method (49), or both (2). DDST detected the ESβL enzyme in 10.7% of the tested isolates which were all Pseudomonas aeruginosa. None of the bacterial isolates revealed MβL production with the imipenem/imipenem-EDTA method, whereas 26.7% of tested isolates produced MβL with EDTA-disc potentiation using ceftazidime out of which 65.0% were P. aeruginosa. Moreover, ESβL/MβL co-production was evident in 22.7% of the tested bacterial isolates with P. aeruginosa constituting 64.7%. Conclusion: ESβL and MβL co-production among the studied isolates indicates a heightened resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, suggesting grave health consequences, especially in immunocompromised individuals with already limiting therapeutic options in the region. The study revealed higher ESβL production compared to MβL production in isolates, with the predominating producing specie being P. aeruginosa, and higher ESβL and MβL detection by the combination disc method and EDTA-disc potentiation using ceftazidime, respectively.
从HIV血清阳性个体分离的革兰氏阴性菌中产生ESβL和MβL
背景:革兰氏阴性菌在免疫功能低下患者中产生广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESβL)或金属β-内酰胺酶(MβL)对感染控制提出了严重的治疗挑战,并与较高发病率/死亡率的感染有关,特别是在发展中国家。本研究旨在表型评价从人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)阳性个体的临床样本中分离出的75株革兰氏阴性细菌中ESβL和MβL的产生。方法:采用显色培养基、分析谱指数20 E和20 NE试剂盒进行细菌鉴定,采用双圆盘协同试验(DDST)和联合圆盘法检测ESβL的产量,采用亚胺培南乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)联合圆盘法和头孢他啶增强EDTA-圆盘法筛选MβL的产量。结果:57株菌株采用DDST法(6株)、联合圆盘法(49株)或两种方法(2株)均可产ESβL,占76.0%。DDST检出率为10.7%,均为铜绿假单胞菌。采用亚胺培南/亚胺培南- edta法生产MβL的菌株均未发现,而采用头孢他啶增强EDTA-disc法生产MβL的菌株占26.7%,其中铜绿假单胞菌占65.0%。此外,22.7%的分离菌可产ESβL/MβL,其中铜绿假单胞菌占64.7%。结论:所研究的分离株中ESβL和MβL的共同产生表明对β-内酰胺类抗生素的耐药性增强,这表明严重的健康后果,特别是在该地区已经有限的治疗选择的免疫功能低下的个体中。结果表明,菌株ESβL的产率高于MβL,主要产种为铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa),且联合圆盘法和头孢他啶edta圆盘增强法对ESβL和MβL的检出率均较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信