Risk Factors for Continuation of Atypical Antipsychotics at Hospital Discharge in Two Intensive Care Unit Cohorts

Alexander R. Levine, Steven M. Lemieux, D. D'Aquino, Analise Tenney, M. Pisani, Syed Ali
{"title":"Risk Factors for Continuation of Atypical Antipsychotics at Hospital Discharge in Two Intensive Care Unit Cohorts","authors":"Alexander R. Levine, Steven M. Lemieux, D. D'Aquino, Analise Tenney, M. Pisani, Syed Ali","doi":"10.1177/1179557319863813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Atypical antipsychotics are frequently initiated in the intensive care unit (ICU) to treat delirium. Many patients continue on these agents at hospital discharge despite a lack of data to support long-term use. Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to determine underlying risk factors for continuation of antipsychotics at hospital discharge in medical intensive care unit (MICU) and surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients when evaluated as separate cohorts. Methods: A single-center, retrospective study in patients newly initiated on quetiapine, risperidone, or olanzapine in a 22-bed mixed medical-surgical ICU admitted from January 2017 to July 2018. Results: A total of 78 (62.9%) MICU patients and 46 (37.1%) SICU patients met the inclusion criteria during this time frame. A total of 29 MICU patients (37.2%) were prescribed antipsychotics at hospital discharge compared to 25 SICU patients (54.3%), P = .063. The percentage of MICU patients prescribed antipsychotics at hospital discharge was significantly higher in patients ⩾60 years of age (22 [75.9%] vs 26 [53.1%], P = .045), with a history of dementia (5 [17.2%] vs 1 [2%], P = .015), admitted with hemorrhagic stroke (5 [17.2%] vs 2 [4.1%], P = .049), and initiated on risperidone (3 [10.3%] vs 0%, P = .022). The risk of pre-existing dementia remained significant in a multivariate logistic regression that controlled for confounding variables, odds ratio (OR) = 10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-90.5, P = .040). The percentage of SICU patients prescribed antipsychotics at discharge was significantly higher in those with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI; 8 [72.7%] vs 0%, P = .004) and initiated on quetiapine (19 [76%] vs 9 [42.9%], P = .022). Conclusion: Antipsychotics were commonly continued at hospital discharge in both MICU and SICU patients. Several risk factors for continuation of antipsychotics were identified in these two cohorts. Future efforts assessing the appropriateness of antipsychotics at transitions of care are warranted.","PeriodicalId":10437,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights: Psychiatry","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights: Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179557319863813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: Atypical antipsychotics are frequently initiated in the intensive care unit (ICU) to treat delirium. Many patients continue on these agents at hospital discharge despite a lack of data to support long-term use. Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to determine underlying risk factors for continuation of antipsychotics at hospital discharge in medical intensive care unit (MICU) and surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients when evaluated as separate cohorts. Methods: A single-center, retrospective study in patients newly initiated on quetiapine, risperidone, or olanzapine in a 22-bed mixed medical-surgical ICU admitted from January 2017 to July 2018. Results: A total of 78 (62.9%) MICU patients and 46 (37.1%) SICU patients met the inclusion criteria during this time frame. A total of 29 MICU patients (37.2%) were prescribed antipsychotics at hospital discharge compared to 25 SICU patients (54.3%), P = .063. The percentage of MICU patients prescribed antipsychotics at hospital discharge was significantly higher in patients ⩾60 years of age (22 [75.9%] vs 26 [53.1%], P = .045), with a history of dementia (5 [17.2%] vs 1 [2%], P = .015), admitted with hemorrhagic stroke (5 [17.2%] vs 2 [4.1%], P = .049), and initiated on risperidone (3 [10.3%] vs 0%, P = .022). The risk of pre-existing dementia remained significant in a multivariate logistic regression that controlled for confounding variables, odds ratio (OR) = 10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-90.5, P = .040). The percentage of SICU patients prescribed antipsychotics at discharge was significantly higher in those with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI; 8 [72.7%] vs 0%, P = .004) and initiated on quetiapine (19 [76%] vs 9 [42.9%], P = .022). Conclusion: Antipsychotics were commonly continued at hospital discharge in both MICU and SICU patients. Several risk factors for continuation of antipsychotics were identified in these two cohorts. Future efforts assessing the appropriateness of antipsychotics at transitions of care are warranted.
两组重症监护病房患者出院时继续服用非典型抗精神病药物的危险因素
非典型抗精神病药物经常在重症监护病房(ICU)开始治疗谵妄。许多患者在出院时继续使用这些药物,尽管缺乏支持长期使用的数据。目的:本研究的主要目的是确定作为单独队列评估的内科重症监护病房(MICU)和外科重症监护病房(SICU)患者出院时继续使用抗精神病药物的潜在危险因素。方法:对2017年1月至2018年7月在22张床位的混合内科-外科ICU收治的新开始使用喹硫平、利培酮或奥氮平的患者进行单中心回顾性研究。结果:共有78例(62.9%)MICU患者和46例(37.1%)SICU患者符合纳入标准。MICU患者29例(37.2%)出院时服用抗精神病药物,而SICU患者25例(54.3%)出院时服用抗精神病药物,P = 0.063。在年龄大于或等于60岁的患者中,出院时开具抗精神病药物的MICU患者百分比显着更高(22 [75.9%]vs 26 [53.1%], P = 0.045),有痴呆史(5 [17.2%]vs 1 [2%], P = 0.015),入院患有出血性中风(5 [17.2%]vs 2 [4.1%], P = 0.049),并开始使用利培酮(3 [10.3%]vs 0%, P = 0.022)。在控制混杂变量的多因素logistic回归中,既往痴呆的风险仍然显著,优势比(OR) = 10(95%可信区间[CI]: 1.11-90.5, P = 0.040)。重型颅脑损伤(TBI)的SICU患者出院时服用抗精神病药物的比例显著高于重型颅脑损伤(TBI;8名[72.7%]对0%,P = 0.004)和开始使用喹硫平(19名[76%]对9名[42.9%],P = 0.022)。结论:MICU和SICU患者出院时均继续使用抗精神病药物。在这两个队列中确定了持续使用抗精神病药物的几个危险因素。未来的努力评估适当的抗精神病药物的过渡护理是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信