Disjunctive Love: Philosophical Project and Poetic Experience in Donne's “The Ecstasy”

J. Kuzner
{"title":"Disjunctive Love: Philosophical Project and Poetic Experience in Donne's “The Ecstasy”","authors":"J. Kuzner","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823294503.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Donne’s “The Ecstasy” explores a love which is as virtual as it is actual, creating a life of love that is as absorbing inside the poem as it is impossible outside it, and raising a question about how poetry can think about love distinctively. To address that question, this chapter compares a specific poetic form, the quatrain, with philosophical dialogues by Marsilio Ficino, Tullia d’Aragona, and Leone Ebreo. “The Ecstasy” shares with these dialogues in imagining love as a phenomenon of non-sovereignty, of giving up the wish for mastery over the self and control over the beloved, with a key difference residing in how non-sovereignty comes about. For Ficino, Tullia, and Leone, love assumes the form of what Bataille would call a project: an undertaking with an aim over which lovers have at least some control—in this case, a project of self-transformation by which lovers become more perfect. “The Ecstasy” sometimes also makes love into a project, but in other places, the poem’s quatrains turn love from a project into an experience: (again, in Bataille’s terms) an aimless encounter in which lover and beloved become entangled in incomplete yet excruciating ways, ways that forge a distinctly poetic non-sovereign love.","PeriodicalId":22551,"journal":{"name":"The Form of Love","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Form of Love","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823294503.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Donne’s “The Ecstasy” explores a love which is as virtual as it is actual, creating a life of love that is as absorbing inside the poem as it is impossible outside it, and raising a question about how poetry can think about love distinctively. To address that question, this chapter compares a specific poetic form, the quatrain, with philosophical dialogues by Marsilio Ficino, Tullia d’Aragona, and Leone Ebreo. “The Ecstasy” shares with these dialogues in imagining love as a phenomenon of non-sovereignty, of giving up the wish for mastery over the self and control over the beloved, with a key difference residing in how non-sovereignty comes about. For Ficino, Tullia, and Leone, love assumes the form of what Bataille would call a project: an undertaking with an aim over which lovers have at least some control—in this case, a project of self-transformation by which lovers become more perfect. “The Ecstasy” sometimes also makes love into a project, but in other places, the poem’s quatrains turn love from a project into an experience: (again, in Bataille’s terms) an aimless encounter in which lover and beloved become entangled in incomplete yet excruciating ways, ways that forge a distinctly poetic non-sovereign love.
分离的爱:多恩《狂喜》的哲学构想与诗意体验
多恩的《狂喜》探索了一种既虚拟又真实的爱,创造了一种爱的生活,这种生活在诗中是如此吸引人,而在诗之外是不可能的,并提出了一个问题,即诗歌如何能够独特地思考爱情。为了回答这个问题,本章将一种特殊的诗歌形式——四行诗——与马尔西利奥·菲西诺、图利亚·德·阿拉戈纳和莱昂内·埃布雷奥的哲学对话进行比较。《狂喜》和这些对话一样,把爱想象成一种非主权的现象,一种放弃控制自我和控制所爱之人的愿望,关键的区别在于非主权是如何产生的。对菲西诺、图利亚和莱昂内来说,爱情呈现出巴塔耶所说的一种计划的形式:一项有目标的事业,情人至少在某种程度上可以控制——在这种情况下,这是一项自我改造的计划,情人通过它变得更加完美。《狂喜》有时也把爱变成一个计划,但在其他地方,这首诗的四行诗把爱从一个计划变成了一种经历:(再次,用巴塔耶的话说)一种漫无目的的相遇,在这种相遇中,爱人和被爱的人以不完整但痛苦的方式纠缠在一起,这种方式形成了一种独特的诗意的、非主权的爱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信