A study of intermedia and interorganizational agenda-setting in the news coverage of the Ebola virus on Twitter

IF 0.4 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Ahmed Al-Rawi, J. Groshek
{"title":"A study of intermedia and interorganizational agenda-setting in the news coverage of the Ebola virus on Twitter","authors":"Ahmed Al-Rawi, J. Groshek","doi":"10.1386/ajms_00073_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ebola virus is a rare but often severe and fatal illness in humans. It spreads from animals to humans and then transgresses through human-to-human transmission. The 2014 Ebola virus disease outbreak captured substantial media attention around the world, which is the cornerstone of our study since it can inform us about the current news coverage on the COVID-19 pandemic. This article investigates the media coverage of Ebola in five pairs of English and Arabic international television media outlets (BBC, CNN, SkyNews, RT and France24) by examining the headlines of 298,559 news stories that the respective organizations posted on their official Twitter accounts. Methodologically, we extracted headlines from news outlets that addressed the news on the Ebola virus in two languages: English and Arabic. The media outlets include the following: CNN (English and Arabic), BBC (English and Arabic), SkyNews (English and Arabic), RT (formerly known as Russia Today) (English and Arabic) and France24 (English and Arabic) from late 2013 to early 2015 during which time the Ebola epidemic intensified. We then used descriptive statistics to understand the volume of news coverage and calculate the frequencies, percentages, mean, median and standard deviations for these channels. Further, we continued to model time series regression between the five pairs of news outlets using Granger causality tests. The findings show that over the course of approximately one year’s worth of coverage on these networks, Ebola was mentioned in the headlines of 4138 stories, which constitutes 1.38 per cent of the total news coverage of all media outlets. Building on the theory of intermedia agenda-setting that outlines the ways in which major news organizations influence the agendas of other news outlets, the findings reported here indicate strong, time-ordered patterns where English-language coverage consistently precedes and helps to significantly explain the distribution of Arabic media coverage. In addition to providing evidence of intermedia agenda-setting from a comparative perspective in this context, this article expands on this theory and suggests that it can be applied to multilingual outlets from the same news organizations.","PeriodicalId":43197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00073_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ebola virus is a rare but often severe and fatal illness in humans. It spreads from animals to humans and then transgresses through human-to-human transmission. The 2014 Ebola virus disease outbreak captured substantial media attention around the world, which is the cornerstone of our study since it can inform us about the current news coverage on the COVID-19 pandemic. This article investigates the media coverage of Ebola in five pairs of English and Arabic international television media outlets (BBC, CNN, SkyNews, RT and France24) by examining the headlines of 298,559 news stories that the respective organizations posted on their official Twitter accounts. Methodologically, we extracted headlines from news outlets that addressed the news on the Ebola virus in two languages: English and Arabic. The media outlets include the following: CNN (English and Arabic), BBC (English and Arabic), SkyNews (English and Arabic), RT (formerly known as Russia Today) (English and Arabic) and France24 (English and Arabic) from late 2013 to early 2015 during which time the Ebola epidemic intensified. We then used descriptive statistics to understand the volume of news coverage and calculate the frequencies, percentages, mean, median and standard deviations for these channels. Further, we continued to model time series regression between the five pairs of news outlets using Granger causality tests. The findings show that over the course of approximately one year’s worth of coverage on these networks, Ebola was mentioned in the headlines of 4138 stories, which constitutes 1.38 per cent of the total news coverage of all media outlets. Building on the theory of intermedia agenda-setting that outlines the ways in which major news organizations influence the agendas of other news outlets, the findings reported here indicate strong, time-ordered patterns where English-language coverage consistently precedes and helps to significantly explain the distribution of Arabic media coverage. In addition to providing evidence of intermedia agenda-setting from a comparative perspective in this context, this article expands on this theory and suggests that it can be applied to multilingual outlets from the same news organizations.
关于推特上埃博拉病毒新闻报道中媒介和组织间议程设置的研究
埃博拉病毒是一种罕见但通常严重且致命的人类疾病。它从动物传播到人类,然后通过人与人之间的传播。2014年埃博拉病毒病爆发引起了世界各地媒体的广泛关注,这是我们研究的基石,因为它可以让我们了解当前关于COVID-19大流行的新闻报道。本文调查了五对英语和阿拉伯语国际电视媒体(BBC、CNN、SkyNews、RT和France24)对埃博拉的媒体报道,通过检查各自组织在其官方Twitter账户上发布的298,559条新闻的标题。在方法上,我们用英语和阿拉伯语两种语言从新闻媒体中提取有关埃博拉病毒的新闻标题。这些媒体包括:2013年底至2015年初埃博拉疫情加剧期间的CNN(英语和阿拉伯语)、BBC(英语和阿拉伯语)、天空新闻(英语和阿拉伯语)、RT(前身为今日俄罗斯)(英语和阿拉伯语)和France24(英语和阿拉伯语)。然后,我们使用描述性统计来了解新闻报道的数量,并计算这些渠道的频率、百分比、平均值、中位数和标准差。此外,我们继续使用格兰杰因果检验在五对新闻媒体之间建立时间序列回归模型。研究结果表明,在这些网络大约一年的报道中,有4138篇报道的标题提到了埃博拉,占所有媒体报道总数的1.38%。媒介议程设置理论概述了主要新闻机构影响其他新闻机构议程的方式,在此基础上,本文报告的调查结果表明,英语报道始终领先于其他新闻机构的议程,这一发现有力地解释了阿拉伯语媒体报道的分布。在此背景下,除了从比较的角度提供媒介议程设置的证据外,本文还扩展了这一理论,并建议它可以应用于同一新闻机构的多语言媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信