High Robusta coffee plant density is associated with better yield potential at mixed responses for growth robustness, pests and diseases: which way for a farmer?

G. Sseremba, G. Kagezi, J. Kobusinge, P. Musoli, David Akodi, N. Olango, P. Kucel, Job Chemutai, J. Mulindwa, G. Arinaitwe
{"title":"High Robusta coffee plant density is associated with better yield potential at mixed responses for growth robustness, pests and diseases: which way for a farmer?","authors":"G. Sseremba, G. Kagezi, J. Kobusinge, P. Musoli, David Akodi, N. Olango, P. Kucel, Job Chemutai, J. Mulindwa, G. Arinaitwe","doi":"10.21475/ajcs.21.15.04.p2676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plant density in Robusta coffee is an unresolved issue in low volume producing countries especially when compared with leading producers. In this study, we aimed to compare the response of Robusta coffee to pest incidence, disease severity, growth and yield potential in two contrasting spacing regimes. Two spacing regimes of 3mx3m and 3mx1m were evaluated for selected parameters in a randomized complete block design with three replications. There was a highly significant difference in pest incidence between the spacing regimes (p<0.01) for all the pests except scales (p=0.126). The black coffee trig borer incidence was higher under close spacing of 3mx1m than for 3mx3m with a mean difference of 13.2%. There was no significant association between spacing regime and leaf rust disease incidence while the association was significant for red blister disease (χ2=33.56, df=1, p<0.001). Significant difference in growth response between spacing regimes (p<0.05) were also obtained for change in canopy height (dCAH), number of primaries, number of stems and leaf size. For instance, dCAH was higher under 3mx1m spacing than for 3mx3m spacing. A significant difference in yield potential existed between the spacing regimes (p<0.05) for average yield per tree and average yield per hectare (aYH). Close spacing produced a higher aYH (5.82 t cc/ha) than wide spacing (4.80 t cc/ha). Whereas yield potential is high at high tree densities, associated prevalence of biotic constraints calls for supportive stress management package for farmers.","PeriodicalId":8309,"journal":{"name":"April 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"April 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.21.15.04.p2676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant density in Robusta coffee is an unresolved issue in low volume producing countries especially when compared with leading producers. In this study, we aimed to compare the response of Robusta coffee to pest incidence, disease severity, growth and yield potential in two contrasting spacing regimes. Two spacing regimes of 3mx3m and 3mx1m were evaluated for selected parameters in a randomized complete block design with three replications. There was a highly significant difference in pest incidence between the spacing regimes (p<0.01) for all the pests except scales (p=0.126). The black coffee trig borer incidence was higher under close spacing of 3mx1m than for 3mx3m with a mean difference of 13.2%. There was no significant association between spacing regime and leaf rust disease incidence while the association was significant for red blister disease (χ2=33.56, df=1, p<0.001). Significant difference in growth response between spacing regimes (p<0.05) were also obtained for change in canopy height (dCAH), number of primaries, number of stems and leaf size. For instance, dCAH was higher under 3mx1m spacing than for 3mx3m spacing. A significant difference in yield potential existed between the spacing regimes (p<0.05) for average yield per tree and average yield per hectare (aYH). Close spacing produced a higher aYH (5.82 t cc/ha) than wide spacing (4.80 t cc/ha). Whereas yield potential is high at high tree densities, associated prevalence of biotic constraints calls for supportive stress management package for farmers.
高罗布斯塔咖啡种植密度与在生长稳健性、病虫害混合响应下的更好产量潜力相关:对农民来说,哪条路?
罗布斯塔咖啡的种植密度在产量低的国家是一个未解决的问题,特别是与主要生产国相比。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较两种不同间距制度下罗布斯塔咖啡对害虫发病率、疾病严重程度、生长和产量潜力的反应。在3个重复的随机完全区组设计中,对选定的参数评估了3mx3m和3mx1m两种间距制度。除鳞片外,其他害虫在不同间距下的发病率差异极显著(p<0.01)。黑咖啡在3mx1m的密距下,诱发螟虫的发生率高于3mx3m,平均差值为13.2%。间距制度与叶锈病发病率无显著相关性,而与红疱病发病率有显著相关性(χ2=33.56, df=1, p<0.001)。不同行距条件下,冠层高、初生数、茎数和叶大小的生长响应也存在显著差异(p<0.05)。例如,3mx1m间距下的dCAH高于3mx3m间距。单株平均产量和每公顷平均产量在不同行距条件下存在显著差异(p<0.05)。近间距的aYH(5.82吨立方厘米/公顷)高于宽间距(4.80吨立方厘米/公顷)。尽管树木密度高,产量潜力高,但相关的生物限制普遍存在,要求为农民提供支持性压力管理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信