How are failure modes, defect types and test methods changing for 32nm/28nm technologies and beyond?

P. Nigh
{"title":"How are failure modes, defect types and test methods changing for 32nm/28nm technologies and beyond?","authors":"P. Nigh","doi":"10.1109/TEST.2012.6401528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key issue is how advanced technologies are changing the way we do Testing and the Test Industry in general. There are many reports that the failure mechanisms are changing — and therefore Test much change also in response. For example, it has been reported that systematic feature-driven failures are more prevalent than physical spot defectswhich have historically been targeted during Testing. Advanced technologies are expected to drive Testing to fundamental changes in the Test process. For example, Test will assume more responsibility over time in “product personalization” — customizing each chip based on repair/redundant elements, power/performance tuning and new types of fee-dforward data. (e.g., inline test results, optical inspection data) “Adaptive Testing” will enable automated data-driven methods to optimize Quality/Reliability/Yield Loss/Test Time trad-e offs in real-time during production Testing. There are also emerging changes due to the foundry / fables semiconductor model where Testing requirements may be jointly defined among foundries, IP providers, the chip design/integrator and manufacturing test engineerin. g Clearly, there must be more data shared across companies in the End-to-End supply chain … how will this change testing? In this panel, a set of industry experts will describe their experience with advanced technoloyg nodes (32nm/28nm) and how Testing is changing for these nodes. The discussion will range from specific examples of new failures modes … to changes in Test to detect these failure modes … to broader Test process changes. The panel will also address questions like the following: · What are 1–2 examples of new failure mechanisms that you found at 32nm/28nm ? · How did you change testing because of these new defect types/failure mechanisms ? · What new method of “statistical testing” (Adaptive Testing) have you recently started using ? · 3DIC testing — is it really different ? If so, why ? · Product personalization — is this becoming more prevalent ? If so, what are the new drivers & methods ? · Power/performance optimization — is this driving major changes to the Testing process ? If so, what changes ? · Reliability defect screening — are high voltage & high temperature accelerating still effective & required ? · How should the Test industry change to drive improvements to the End-to-End Test process ? · e.g., more rapid, more detailed, real-time cross-company data sharing?","PeriodicalId":6403,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International Test Conference","volume":"2 2 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International Test Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEST.2012.6401528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key issue is how advanced technologies are changing the way we do Testing and the Test Industry in general. There are many reports that the failure mechanisms are changing — and therefore Test much change also in response. For example, it has been reported that systematic feature-driven failures are more prevalent than physical spot defectswhich have historically been targeted during Testing. Advanced technologies are expected to drive Testing to fundamental changes in the Test process. For example, Test will assume more responsibility over time in “product personalization” — customizing each chip based on repair/redundant elements, power/performance tuning and new types of fee-dforward data. (e.g., inline test results, optical inspection data) “Adaptive Testing” will enable automated data-driven methods to optimize Quality/Reliability/Yield Loss/Test Time trad-e offs in real-time during production Testing. There are also emerging changes due to the foundry / fables semiconductor model where Testing requirements may be jointly defined among foundries, IP providers, the chip design/integrator and manufacturing test engineerin. g Clearly, there must be more data shared across companies in the End-to-End supply chain … how will this change testing? In this panel, a set of industry experts will describe their experience with advanced technoloyg nodes (32nm/28nm) and how Testing is changing for these nodes. The discussion will range from specific examples of new failures modes … to changes in Test to detect these failure modes … to broader Test process changes. The panel will also address questions like the following: · What are 1–2 examples of new failure mechanisms that you found at 32nm/28nm ? · How did you change testing because of these new defect types/failure mechanisms ? · What new method of “statistical testing” (Adaptive Testing) have you recently started using ? · 3DIC testing — is it really different ? If so, why ? · Product personalization — is this becoming more prevalent ? If so, what are the new drivers & methods ? · Power/performance optimization — is this driving major changes to the Testing process ? If so, what changes ? · Reliability defect screening — are high voltage & high temperature accelerating still effective & required ? · How should the Test industry change to drive improvements to the End-to-End Test process ? · e.g., more rapid, more detailed, real-time cross-company data sharing?
32nm/28nm及以上技术的失效模式、缺陷类型和测试方法有何变化?
一个关键的问题是先进的技术是如何改变我们进行测试和测试行业的方式的。有许多报告说,失效机制正在发生变化,因此Test也会做出相应的变化。例如,据报道,系统特性驱动的故障比物理点缺陷更普遍,物理点缺陷历来是测试期间的目标。预计先进的技术将推动测试在测试过程中发生根本性的变化。例如,随着时间的推移,Test将在“产品个性化”方面承担更多的责任——根据维修/冗余元件、电源/性能调整和新型前馈数据定制每个芯片。(例如,内联测试结果,光学检测数据)“自适应测试”将使自动化数据驱动方法能够在生产测试期间实时优化质量/可靠性/良率损失/测试时间权衡。由于代工厂/晶片半导体模式的变化,测试需求可能在代工厂、IP提供商、芯片设计/集成商和制造测试工程师之间共同定义。显然,在端到端供应链中,必须有更多的数据在公司之间共享……这将如何改变测试?在这个专题讨论中,一组行业专家将介绍他们在先进技术节点(32nm/28nm)方面的经验,以及这些节点的测试变化。讨论范围将从新的失效模式的具体例子……到测试中检测这些失效模式的变化……到更广泛的测试过程变化。小组还将讨论以下问题:·你在32nm/28nm工艺中发现的1-2个新失效机制的例子?·由于这些新的缺陷类型/失效机制,你是如何改变测试的?·你最近开始使用什么新的“统计测试”(适应性测试)方法?·3DIC测试——它真的不同吗?如果是,为什么?·产品个性化——这是否变得越来越普遍?如果是,新的驱动因素和方法是什么?·电源/性能优化——这是否推动了测试过程的重大变化?如果是这样,会有什么变化?·可靠性缺陷筛选-高压和高温加速是否仍然有效和需要?·测试行业应该如何改变以推动端到端测试流程的改进?·例如,更快速、更详细、实时的跨公司数据共享?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信