Benchmarking technical and economic performance of beef cow-calf to finishing production systems in Ireland

R.F. Taylor , P. Crosson , A.K. Kelly , M. McGee
{"title":"Benchmarking technical and economic performance of beef cow-calf to finishing production systems in Ireland","authors":"R.F. Taylor ,&nbsp;P. Crosson ,&nbsp;A.K. Kelly ,&nbsp;M. McGee","doi":"10.15232/pas.2017-01709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The objectives of this study were, for cow-calf to finishing production systems, to benchmark animal and financial performance of Irish “national average” farms (AVE) and farms participating in a farm improvement program (IMP) with experimental research farm systems finishing male progeny as steers (RES-S) or bulls (RES-B), and to identify key technical characteristics and financial drivers within these 3 farm categories. Stocking rate, BW output per livestock unit, and carcass weight per day were less on AVE and IMP compared with RES-S/RES-B. Age at first calving was 31.5, 28.9, and 24.0 mo on AVE, IMP, and RES-S/RES-B, respectively. </span>Calving rate and weaning rate were less on AVE than on IMP, and these rates were less on IMP than on RES-S/RES-B. Gross output value and costs per hectare were least on AVE and greatest on RES-S/RES-B. Feed-related costs accounted for 36, 50, 47, and 58% of total costs per hectare on AVE, IMP, RES-S, and RES-B, respectively. Fixed costs accounted for the largest proportion of AVE total costs. Costs of production per kilogram of beef BW equated to $4.73 (€4.04), $2.26 (€1.93), $1.78 (€1.52), and $2.04 (€1.74) on AVE, IMP, RES-S, and RES-B, respectively. A negative net profit per hectare of −$897 (−€767) was achieved by AVE; IMP, RES-S, and RES-B attained net profits per hectare of $208 (€178), $587 (€502), and $405 (€346), respectively. Key performance indicators underpinning profitable beef cow-calf to finishing systems include high individual animal performance (cow reproduction and progeny growth), optimal stocking rates, and low fixed and purchased feed costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 5","pages":"Pages 421-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01709","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618301268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The objectives of this study were, for cow-calf to finishing production systems, to benchmark animal and financial performance of Irish “national average” farms (AVE) and farms participating in a farm improvement program (IMP) with experimental research farm systems finishing male progeny as steers (RES-S) or bulls (RES-B), and to identify key technical characteristics and financial drivers within these 3 farm categories. Stocking rate, BW output per livestock unit, and carcass weight per day were less on AVE and IMP compared with RES-S/RES-B. Age at first calving was 31.5, 28.9, and 24.0 mo on AVE, IMP, and RES-S/RES-B, respectively. Calving rate and weaning rate were less on AVE than on IMP, and these rates were less on IMP than on RES-S/RES-B. Gross output value and costs per hectare were least on AVE and greatest on RES-S/RES-B. Feed-related costs accounted for 36, 50, 47, and 58% of total costs per hectare on AVE, IMP, RES-S, and RES-B, respectively. Fixed costs accounted for the largest proportion of AVE total costs. Costs of production per kilogram of beef BW equated to $4.73 (€4.04), $2.26 (€1.93), $1.78 (€1.52), and $2.04 (€1.74) on AVE, IMP, RES-S, and RES-B, respectively. A negative net profit per hectare of −$897 (−€767) was achieved by AVE; IMP, RES-S, and RES-B attained net profits per hectare of $208 (€178), $587 (€502), and $405 (€346), respectively. Key performance indicators underpinning profitable beef cow-calf to finishing systems include high individual animal performance (cow reproduction and progeny growth), optimal stocking rates, and low fixed and purchased feed costs.

对爱尔兰肉牛犊牛育肥生产系统的技术和经济性能进行基准测试
本研究的目的是,从犊牛到育肥生产系统,对爱尔兰“全国平均”农场(AVE)和参与农场改进计划(IMP)的农场进行动物和财务绩效的基准测试,实验研究农场系统将雄性后代育成阉牛(RES-S)或公牛(RES-B),并确定这三个农场类别中的关键技术特征和财务驱动因素。与RES-S/RES-B相比,AVE和IMP的载畜率、单位体重和日胴体重均较低。AVE、IMP和RES-S/RES-B的初产犊龄分别为31.5、28.9和24.0月龄。AVE组产仔率和断奶率低于IMP组,IMP组产仔率和断奶率低于RES-S/RES-B组。AVE的每公顷总产值和成本最低,RES-S/RES-B的最高。饲料相关成本分别占AVE、IMP、RES-S和RES-B每公顷总成本的36%、50%、47%和58%。固定成本在AVE总成本中所占比例最大。AVE、IMP、RES-S和RES-B的每公斤牛肉生产成本分别为4.73美元(4.04欧元)、2.26美元(1.93欧元)、1.78美元(1.52欧元)和2.04美元(1.74欧元)。AVE实现了每公顷负净利润- 897美元(- 767欧元);IMP、RES-S和RES-B的每公顷净利润分别为208美元(178欧元)、587美元(502欧元)和405美元(346欧元)。支撑肉牛犊牛至肥育系统盈利的关键绩效指标包括高个体动物生产性能(奶牛繁殖和后代生长)、最佳放养率以及较低的固定和购买饲料成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信