{"title":"Is it Sustainable to Cultivate a Monoculture of Durum Wheat with Prolonged No-Tillage Management?","authors":"T. A., R. M, F. R.","doi":"10.26420/annagriccropsci.2022.1105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prolonged effect of no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) treatment on durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.), continuously grown in Southern Italy, has been evaluated in experimental fields for sixteen years (1994/95-2009/10) to ascertain whether the yields and quality of the grain as well as some soil characteristics had changed. The average grain yield in CT (2.70 ± 0.96 t ha-1) and NT (2.63 ± 0.74 t ha-1) treatment was not significant. CT treatment showed higher values of plant height and grain weight (74.2 cm and 43.2 g) than NT (71.0 cm and 41.8 g). Regarding to the semolina quality, the values of the gluten index and the dough strength (W parameter) as well as the protein content and the yellow index were not significantly different for the NT and CT treatments. As for soil moisture, the NT treatment stored in the soil profile, and over time, about 13% more water than the CT one. In the upper soil layer of the NT treatment the SOC value (16.0 ± 2.2 g kg-1) was 13.2% higher than CT one (14.2 ± 1.2 g kg-1) while the CT treatment (13.7 ± 0.5 g kg-1) showed in the lower soil layer a SOC value of 30.2% higher than the NT one (9.6 ± 1.9 g kg-1). Hence the prolonged no-tillage adoption in conditions of continuous durum wheat cultivation, even with slight losses in yield but not in the quality of grain or semolina, would seem sustainable.","PeriodicalId":8133,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Agricultural & Crop Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Agricultural & Crop Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/annagriccropsci.2022.1105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The prolonged effect of no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) treatment on durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.), continuously grown in Southern Italy, has been evaluated in experimental fields for sixteen years (1994/95-2009/10) to ascertain whether the yields and quality of the grain as well as some soil characteristics had changed. The average grain yield in CT (2.70 ± 0.96 t ha-1) and NT (2.63 ± 0.74 t ha-1) treatment was not significant. CT treatment showed higher values of plant height and grain weight (74.2 cm and 43.2 g) than NT (71.0 cm and 41.8 g). Regarding to the semolina quality, the values of the gluten index and the dough strength (W parameter) as well as the protein content and the yellow index were not significantly different for the NT and CT treatments. As for soil moisture, the NT treatment stored in the soil profile, and over time, about 13% more water than the CT one. In the upper soil layer of the NT treatment the SOC value (16.0 ± 2.2 g kg-1) was 13.2% higher than CT one (14.2 ± 1.2 g kg-1) while the CT treatment (13.7 ± 0.5 g kg-1) showed in the lower soil layer a SOC value of 30.2% higher than the NT one (9.6 ± 1.9 g kg-1). Hence the prolonged no-tillage adoption in conditions of continuous durum wheat cultivation, even with slight losses in yield but not in the quality of grain or semolina, would seem sustainable.
对意大利南部连续种植的硬粒小麦(Triticum durum Desf.)进行了为期16年(1994/95-2009/10)的免耕(NT)和常规耕作(CT)处理的长期效果评估,以确定籽粒产量和质量以及一些土壤特征是否发生了变化。CT(2.70±0.96 t ha-1)和NT(2.63±0.74 t ha-1)处理的平均籽粒产量不显著。粗粒小麦的株高(74.2 cm)和粒重(43.2 g)均高于粗粒小麦(71.0 cm)和粗粒小麦(41.8 g)。粗粒小麦品质方面,粗粒小麦面筋指数、面团强度(W参数)、蛋白质含量和黄指数在粗粒小麦品质上无显著差异。在土壤水分方面,NT处理在土壤剖面中储存的水分,随着时间的推移,比CT处理多13%左右。土壤表层土壤有机碳(16.0±2.2 g kg-1)比土壤表层有机碳(14.2±1.2 g kg-1)高13.2%,土壤表层有机碳(13.7±0.5 g kg-1)比土壤表层有机碳(9.6±1.9 g kg-1)高30.2%。因此,在连续种植硬粒小麦的条件下,即使产量略有下降,但谷物或粗粒粉的质量却没有下降,长期采用免耕似乎是可持续的。