EVALUATION OF ALTERNATE WATER-POLYMER INJECTION PARAMETERS USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION

V. Botechia, C. Barreto, L. F. Lamas, D. Schiozer
{"title":"EVALUATION OF ALTERNATE WATER-POLYMER INJECTION PARAMETERS USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION","authors":"V. Botechia, C. Barreto, L. F. Lamas, D. Schiozer","doi":"10.5419/BJPG2019-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding an efficient injection strategy using polymers to reduce water-oil mobility ratio and improve sweep efficiency relies on many parameters. To overcome the disadvantages (injectivity loss and high costs) of injecting a continuous polymer bank, an alternative is to alternate water-polymer injection cycles, combining the benefits of water flooding (better injectivity) and polymer flooding (better sweep). A common approach is the injection of a continuous polymer bank after a period of water injection. In this case, parameters of the polymer bank (i.e. duration and starting date of the bank) are control variables and must optimized for the strategy. This work (1) evaluates the impact of alternate water-polymer injection parameters and (2) analyzes the viability of using alternate water-polymer cycles to improve the performance of the polymer flooding strategy, previously optimized for continuous injection bank. We analyze the cycle period, starting date of the cycle, and initial injected fluid using net present value (NPV) and other indicators (cumulative oil and water productions and cost of polymer injection). We apply the study to two reservoir models based on offshore heavy oil fields. The results show that cycle parameters can impact strategy performance significantly and that proper evaluation can benefit production. We observed that reducing the cycle period helped maintain injection flow at higher levels, avoiding the reduction of oil production by pressure depletion. We also noted that the cycle must start in the first years after the beginning of injection. It is important to identify the most influential parameters to set injection levels to support beneficial effects of both methods, and adjust the optimum amount of polymer to be injected.","PeriodicalId":9312,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5419/BJPG2019-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finding an efficient injection strategy using polymers to reduce water-oil mobility ratio and improve sweep efficiency relies on many parameters. To overcome the disadvantages (injectivity loss and high costs) of injecting a continuous polymer bank, an alternative is to alternate water-polymer injection cycles, combining the benefits of water flooding (better injectivity) and polymer flooding (better sweep). A common approach is the injection of a continuous polymer bank after a period of water injection. In this case, parameters of the polymer bank (i.e. duration and starting date of the bank) are control variables and must optimized for the strategy. This work (1) evaluates the impact of alternate water-polymer injection parameters and (2) analyzes the viability of using alternate water-polymer cycles to improve the performance of the polymer flooding strategy, previously optimized for continuous injection bank. We analyze the cycle period, starting date of the cycle, and initial injected fluid using net present value (NPV) and other indicators (cumulative oil and water productions and cost of polymer injection). We apply the study to two reservoir models based on offshore heavy oil fields. The results show that cycle parameters can impact strategy performance significantly and that proper evaluation can benefit production. We observed that reducing the cycle period helped maintain injection flow at higher levels, avoiding the reduction of oil production by pressure depletion. We also noted that the cycle must start in the first years after the beginning of injection. It is important to identify the most influential parameters to set injection levels to support beneficial effects of both methods, and adjust the optimum amount of polymer to be injected.
用数值模拟方法评价水-聚合物交替注入参数
利用聚合物寻找一种有效的注入策略,以降低水油流度比,提高波及效率,这取决于许多参数。为了克服连续注入聚合物的缺点(注入能力损失和高成本),一种替代方法是交替注入水-聚合物循环,结合水驱(更好的注入能力)和聚合物驱(更好的波及能力)的优点。一种常见的方法是在注水一段时间后连续注入聚合物库。在这种情况下,聚合物库的参数(即库的持续时间和开始日期)是控制变量,必须针对策略进行优化。这项工作(1)评估了交替注入水-聚合物参数的影响,(2)分析了使用交替注入水-聚合物循环来提高聚合物驱策略性能的可行性,该策略之前针对连续注入库进行了优化。我们使用净现值(NPV)和其他指标(累计油水产量和聚合物注入成本)分析循环周期、周期开始日期和初始注入流体。将该方法应用于两种基于海上稠油油田的储层模型。结果表明,周期参数对战略绩效有显著影响,合理的评价有利于生产。我们观察到,缩短循环周期有助于将注入流量保持在较高水平,避免了压力耗尽导致的产油量减少。我们还注意到,周期必须在开始注射后的头几年开始。重要的是要确定最具影响力的参数来设置注入水平,以支持两种方法的有益效果,并调整要注入的聚合物的最佳量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信