Investigating outcomes of social care programmes using creative study designs for service excellence

Q3 Social Sciences
H. Lo
{"title":"Investigating outcomes of social care programmes using creative study designs for service excellence","authors":"H. Lo","doi":"10.1080/17525098.2022.2099600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, the author has reviewed four pieces of practice research that aim to investigate the outcome of social care programmes. Special attention is given to the process where the concerns of social work practitioners and stakeholders, including academic supervisors, agency administrators, funders and policy makers involved in the dialogues. In addition to the requirement of rigour in study design, priority is given to the significance of the contribution to practice knowledge through adequately interpreting and disseminating research findings through dialogues. Based on the mapping of individual practitioner−researcher, exemplars of randomised controlled trial and clinical data mining in social care programme evaluation are selected to illustrate how they respond to the research questions in a specific practice setting.","PeriodicalId":38938,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Social Work","volume":"11 1","pages":"262 - 269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2022.2099600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, the author has reviewed four pieces of practice research that aim to investigate the outcome of social care programmes. Special attention is given to the process where the concerns of social work practitioners and stakeholders, including academic supervisors, agency administrators, funders and policy makers involved in the dialogues. In addition to the requirement of rigour in study design, priority is given to the significance of the contribution to practice knowledge through adequately interpreting and disseminating research findings through dialogues. Based on the mapping of individual practitioner−researcher, exemplars of randomised controlled trial and clinical data mining in social care programme evaluation are selected to illustrate how they respond to the research questions in a specific practice setting.
使用创造性的研究设计来调查社会关怀计划的结果,以获得卓越的服务
在本文中,作者回顾了四项旨在调查社会关怀计划结果的实践研究。特别关注社会工作从业者和利益相关者(包括学术主管、机构行政人员、资助者和参与对话的决策者)关注的过程。除了严谨的研究设计要求外,优先考虑通过对话充分解释和传播研究成果对实践知识的贡献的重要性。基于个体从业者-研究者的映射,选择了随机对照试验和临床数据挖掘在社会护理项目评估中的例子,以说明他们如何在特定的实践环境中回应研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Journal of Social Work
China Journal of Social Work Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信