"Interfaith dialogue in limbo: How can tradition work against religious purposes?"

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
T. Ciocan
{"title":"\"Interfaith dialogue in limbo: How can tradition work against religious purposes?\"","authors":"T. Ciocan","doi":"10.51917/dialogo.2022.8.2.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"When we talk about dialogue, we always start looking for ways to best present the content of our speech. Approaching another through dialogue does not seem to care too much about the will or desire to accept the otherness for dialogue even if this is the basis of the binary formula of dialogue. Yet, in the case of religious dialogue, things are not at all so clear or proactive; instead, this (accepting otherness) is usually the central issue of interreligious dialogue. However, when we finally manage to bring together two or more religious representatives for dialogue, the most intriguing aspect of the dialogue is less emphasized on the content and issues to be brought to the attention of the participants and more on the issue of accepting, tolerating all others’ traditions through this dialogue. Nervousness, anxiety, discomfort, and squirming are the habitual and, even more shocking, \"\"expected\"\" features in interfaith dialogue. Well, if this is the main problem in interfaith - being able to bring acceptance in this \"\"toxic\"\" environment - then this would be a step forward. But probably all these are since, at present, the construction of interreligious dialogue is still in progress, about to be polished and become a formal custom, an emerging tradition of the current era. However, is the content that all participants in the interfaith dialogue bring, our particular traditions, to blame for this challenge? Can they help us build the bridge or, on the contrary, put interfaith in a limbo state, waiting for a redeemer? To pinpoint the direction in which interreligious dialogue is heading, we must better evaluate and understand a \"\"tradition\"\", what it is, how it works, and why it is developed and preserved. What is the significance of a tradition for people in general and a religious group in particular? How deeply rooted is it in human thinking and how valuable to fight for it? And then, can we consider changing, altering, or even removing a whole tradition from our perspective? If so, [regardless of the response] what is then the impact of [any] tradition on us and our reactions to the current issues, therefore to human endeavor? This article illustrates the role that tradition plays in peoples' views of the world and how tradition influences their behavior and attitudes toward certain practices and against a current acquisition of interreligious relationships, namely interreligious dialogue.\"","PeriodicalId":42179,"journal":{"name":"Dialogo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51917/dialogo.2022.8.2.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"When we talk about dialogue, we always start looking for ways to best present the content of our speech. Approaching another through dialogue does not seem to care too much about the will or desire to accept the otherness for dialogue even if this is the basis of the binary formula of dialogue. Yet, in the case of religious dialogue, things are not at all so clear or proactive; instead, this (accepting otherness) is usually the central issue of interreligious dialogue. However, when we finally manage to bring together two or more religious representatives for dialogue, the most intriguing aspect of the dialogue is less emphasized on the content and issues to be brought to the attention of the participants and more on the issue of accepting, tolerating all others’ traditions through this dialogue. Nervousness, anxiety, discomfort, and squirming are the habitual and, even more shocking, ""expected"" features in interfaith dialogue. Well, if this is the main problem in interfaith - being able to bring acceptance in this ""toxic"" environment - then this would be a step forward. But probably all these are since, at present, the construction of interreligious dialogue is still in progress, about to be polished and become a formal custom, an emerging tradition of the current era. However, is the content that all participants in the interfaith dialogue bring, our particular traditions, to blame for this challenge? Can they help us build the bridge or, on the contrary, put interfaith in a limbo state, waiting for a redeemer? To pinpoint the direction in which interreligious dialogue is heading, we must better evaluate and understand a ""tradition"", what it is, how it works, and why it is developed and preserved. What is the significance of a tradition for people in general and a religious group in particular? How deeply rooted is it in human thinking and how valuable to fight for it? And then, can we consider changing, altering, or even removing a whole tradition from our perspective? If so, [regardless of the response] what is then the impact of [any] tradition on us and our reactions to the current issues, therefore to human endeavor? This article illustrates the role that tradition plays in peoples' views of the world and how tradition influences their behavior and attitudes toward certain practices and against a current acquisition of interreligious relationships, namely interreligious dialogue."
“不确定的宗教间对话:传统如何违背宗教目的?”
“当我们谈论对话时,我们总是开始寻找最好地呈现我们演讲内容的方法。通过对话接近另一个人似乎并不太关心接受他者进行对话的意愿或愿望,即使这是对话的二元公式的基础。然而,在宗教对话的情况下,事情一点也不清楚或积极主动;相反,这(接受他者)通常是宗教间对话的核心问题。然而,当我们最终设法将两个或更多的宗教代表聚集在一起进行对话时,对话最有趣的方面不是强调要引起参与者注意的内容和问题,而是更多地强调通过对话接受和容忍所有其他传统的问题。紧张、焦虑、不适和扭动是宗教间对话中习惯性的,甚至更令人震惊的“意料之中”的特征。好吧,如果这是宗教间的主要问题——能够在这个“有毒”的环境中获得接受——那么这将是向前迈出的一步。但这一切可能都是因为,目前,宗教间对话的建设仍在进行中,即将被打磨并成为一种正式的习俗,一种新兴的时代传统。然而,不同信仰间对话的所有参与者带来的内容,我们的特殊传统,是造成这种挑战的原因吗?他们能帮助我们建立桥梁吗?或者,相反,把不同信仰置于一个悬而未决的状态,等待救世主的到来?为了确定宗教间对话的方向,我们必须更好地评估和理解“传统”,它是什么,它是如何运作的,以及它为什么被发展和保存。传统对一般人,特别是宗教团体的意义是什么?它在人类思想中有多根深蒂固,为之奋斗又有多大价值?然后,我们能否考虑改变、改变,甚至从我们的角度去除整个传统?如果是这样的话,(不管反应如何)那么(任何)传统对我们的影响以及我们对当前问题的反应,因此对人类努力的影响是什么?这篇文章说明了传统在人们对世界的看法中所起的作用,以及传统如何影响他们对某些习俗的行为和态度,以及对当前获得的宗教间关系,即宗教间对话的态度。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dialogo
Dialogo SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信