{"title":"Reading Guillory's Cultural Capital in South Africa","authors":"S. Jeppie","doi":"10.1215/00166928-10346834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article opens with the 2015 Rhodes Must Fall protests at the University of Cape Town, when a student poured feces on a statue of Cecil Rhodes. This moment exemplifies the ambivalent relationship between symbolic politics and demands for institutional transformation in postapartheid South Africa. The essay considers two sites of tension: the appropriation of this antiapartheid, decolonial rhetoric outside of South Africa (as in the Rhodes Must Fall campaigns at the University of Oxford) and the borrowing of US discourses of racial identity in South African universities. In both cases, specific social and political contexts and their attendant challenges tend to disappear. In South African universities, this has the effect of occluding class, class inequality, and class struggle. To address the South African context, the essay suggests that the writing of Antonio Gramsci, whose work spans literature as cultural production and practical political mobilization, might provide a more useful politics of reading and writing.","PeriodicalId":84799,"journal":{"name":"Genre (Los Angeles, Calif.)","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genre (Los Angeles, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00166928-10346834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article opens with the 2015 Rhodes Must Fall protests at the University of Cape Town, when a student poured feces on a statue of Cecil Rhodes. This moment exemplifies the ambivalent relationship between symbolic politics and demands for institutional transformation in postapartheid South Africa. The essay considers two sites of tension: the appropriation of this antiapartheid, decolonial rhetoric outside of South Africa (as in the Rhodes Must Fall campaigns at the University of Oxford) and the borrowing of US discourses of racial identity in South African universities. In both cases, specific social and political contexts and their attendant challenges tend to disappear. In South African universities, this has the effect of occluding class, class inequality, and class struggle. To address the South African context, the essay suggests that the writing of Antonio Gramsci, whose work spans literature as cultural production and practical political mobilization, might provide a more useful politics of reading and writing.
本文以2015年开普敦大学(University of Cape Town)发生的“罗德必须下台”(Rhodes Must Fall)抗议活动开篇,当时一名学生向塞西尔·罗兹(Cecil Rhodes)的雕像上倾倒粪便。这一时刻体现了后种族隔离时代的南非,象征政治与制度转型需求之间的矛盾关系。这篇文章考虑了两个紧张的地方:在南非以外挪用这种反种族隔离、非殖民主义的言论(如牛津大学的罗德必须垮台运动),以及在南非大学借用美国的种族认同话语。在这两种情况下,特定的社会和政治背景及其伴随的挑战往往会消失。在南非的大学里,这造成了阶级、阶级不平等和阶级斗争的封闭。为了解决南非的背景,本文建议安东尼奥·葛兰西(Antonio Gramsci)的写作,他的作品涵盖了文学作为文化生产和实际政治动员,可能会提供更有用的阅读和写作政治。