Dynamics of Bureaucratic Neutrality Policy in Indonesia

D. Indiahono
{"title":"Dynamics of Bureaucratic Neutrality Policy in Indonesia","authors":"D. Indiahono","doi":"10.24258/jba.v18i3.1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research reveals the dynamics of relations between civil servants and political parties in Indonesia from the Old Order, the New Order to the Reform Era. This study is an important effort to observe the dynamics of civil servants and political parties in Indonesia and create social learning contributions for the betterment of the country. A qualitative research method with secondary data/literature study was selected. The literature study examined policy documents related to bureaucratic neutrality in the Old Order, New Order, and Reform Era. The study data were collected through documentation, including data from papers related to bureaucratic neutrality in the periods above. The study shows that the idea of bureaucratic neutrality had been initiated since the Old Order, disappeared during the New Order, and was reborn in the Reform Era. The challenge of bureaucratic neutrality was the pull of political parties in the parliamentary system during the Old Order, the power of bureaucracy to be the political supporters of the rulers during the New Order, and the contestation of presidential and regional head elections in the Reform Era, which often tests bureaucratic neutrality","PeriodicalId":32596,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Borneo Administrator Media Pengembangan Paradigma dan Gaya Baru Manajemen Pemerintahan Daerah","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Borneo Administrator Media Pengembangan Paradigma dan Gaya Baru Manajemen Pemerintahan Daerah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v18i3.1104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research reveals the dynamics of relations between civil servants and political parties in Indonesia from the Old Order, the New Order to the Reform Era. This study is an important effort to observe the dynamics of civil servants and political parties in Indonesia and create social learning contributions for the betterment of the country. A qualitative research method with secondary data/literature study was selected. The literature study examined policy documents related to bureaucratic neutrality in the Old Order, New Order, and Reform Era. The study data were collected through documentation, including data from papers related to bureaucratic neutrality in the periods above. The study shows that the idea of bureaucratic neutrality had been initiated since the Old Order, disappeared during the New Order, and was reborn in the Reform Era. The challenge of bureaucratic neutrality was the pull of political parties in the parliamentary system during the Old Order, the power of bureaucracy to be the political supporters of the rulers during the New Order, and the contestation of presidential and regional head elections in the Reform Era, which often tests bureaucratic neutrality
印度尼西亚官僚中立政策的动态
本研究揭示了印尼从旧秩序、新秩序到改革时代公务员与政党关系的动态变化。这项研究是观察印度尼西亚公务员和政党动态的重要努力,并为改善国家创造社会学习贡献。本研究采用二次资料/文献研究的定性研究方法。文献研究考察了旧秩序、新秩序和改革时期有关官僚中立的政策文件。研究数据是通过文献收集的,包括上述时期有关官僚中立的论文的数据。研究表明,官僚中立的观念始于旧秩序,在新秩序中消失,在改革时代得到重生。官僚中立性的挑战是旧秩序时期议会制度中政党的拉扯,新秩序时期官僚成为统治者政治支持者的权力,以及改革时代总统和地方首长选举的争夺,这些都是对官僚中立性的考验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书