the story circle as a practice of democratic, critical inquiry

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Natalie M. Fletcher, M. Gregory, P. Shea, Ariel Sykes
{"title":"the story circle as a practice of democratic, critical inquiry","authors":"Natalie M. Fletcher, M. Gregory, P. Shea, Ariel Sykes","doi":"10.12957/childphilo.2021.55722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of this essay have been committed practitioners and teachers of Philosophy for Children in a variety of educational settings, from pre-schools through university doctoral programs and in adult community and religious education programs. The promotion of critical thinking has always been a primary goal of this movement. But communal practices of critical thinking need to include other kinds of democratic conversation that prompt us to see others as full-fledged persons and to be curious about how our being in community with them makes growth and self-correction possible. As we continue to experiment and innovate in new contexts we see ourselves continuing the inquiry around expanding the inclusivity of conversations about basic human concerns. In this essay we describe an inclusive strategy called the story circle, that was first developed as a method of popular education in Denmark and was then adapted as a tool of social change among poor and dis-empowered American citizens in Appalachia. Story circles were later utilized in a philosophical living-learning community and most recently coupled with Lipman and Sharp’s dialogue method of the community of philosophical inquiry (CPI). The authors of this paper have combined story circles with the community of philosophical inquiry in a variety of contexts. In each iteration, telling one’s own story and listening carefully to the stories of others can be equally revelatory actions. ","PeriodicalId":42107,"journal":{"name":"Childhood and Philosophy","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.55722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The authors of this essay have been committed practitioners and teachers of Philosophy for Children in a variety of educational settings, from pre-schools through university doctoral programs and in adult community and religious education programs. The promotion of critical thinking has always been a primary goal of this movement. But communal practices of critical thinking need to include other kinds of democratic conversation that prompt us to see others as full-fledged persons and to be curious about how our being in community with them makes growth and self-correction possible. As we continue to experiment and innovate in new contexts we see ourselves continuing the inquiry around expanding the inclusivity of conversations about basic human concerns. In this essay we describe an inclusive strategy called the story circle, that was first developed as a method of popular education in Denmark and was then adapted as a tool of social change among poor and dis-empowered American citizens in Appalachia. Story circles were later utilized in a philosophical living-learning community and most recently coupled with Lipman and Sharp’s dialogue method of the community of philosophical inquiry (CPI). The authors of this paper have combined story circles with the community of philosophical inquiry in a variety of contexts. In each iteration, telling one’s own story and listening carefully to the stories of others can be equally revelatory actions. 
故事循环是一种民主、批判性探究的实践
本文的作者一直致力于儿童哲学的实践者和教师,在各种教育环境中,从学前教育到大学博士课程,再到成人社区和宗教教育项目。促进批判性思维一直是这一运动的主要目标。但批判性思维的集体实践需要包括其他类型的民主对话,这些对话促使我们将他人视为成熟的人,并对我们与他们在一起如何使成长和自我纠正成为可能感到好奇。随着我们在新的背景下继续进行实验和创新,我们看到自己在继续探索扩大关于人类基本关切的对话的包容性。在这篇文章中,我们描述了一种被称为故事圈的包容性策略,它最初是作为丹麦的一种大众教育方法发展起来的,然后被改编为阿巴拉契亚地区贫穷和无权的美国公民的社会变革工具。故事圈后来被用于哲学的生活-学习社区,最近与Lipman和Sharp的哲学探究社区(CPI)的对话方法相结合。本文的作者将故事圈与各种语境下的哲学探究共同体结合起来。在每一次迭代中,讲述自己的故事和仔细倾听他人的故事同样具有启发性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信