Middle term result of two-stage total knee arthroplasty for prosthetic knee joint infection

Y. Hsueh, Feng-Chen Kao, Jih-Hsi Yeh, C. Yen, Y. Tu
{"title":"Middle term result of two-stage total knee arthroplasty for prosthetic knee joint infection","authors":"Y. Hsueh, Feng-Chen Kao, Jih-Hsi Yeh, C. Yen, Y. Tu","doi":"10.6492/FJMD.201802_9(1).0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challengeable task. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a commonly used treatment for chronic PJI. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the successful rate and possible failure risk factors in patients undergoing a planned two-stage exchange arthroplasty for treatment of knee PJI. Methods: From March 2004 to February 2015, we retrospectively reviewed 35 patients have more than 36 months clinical follow-up with periprosthetic knee joint infections. The clinical outcomes were recorded to define the successful or fail treatment for the periprosthetic knee joint infections. Multiple factors such as obesity, comorbidities, diabetes, were recorded and analyzed to evaluate the risk factors of poor outcome. Results: Five patients were unable to receive second stage surgery with cement spacer retained due to variable reasons. Three patients ended with amputation due to uncontrolled infectious process. Overall 27 patients received two-stage exchange arthroplasty to treat knee PJI were analyzed in this study. However, two patients were loss follow-up during the period between 1st and 2nd time surgery. Two patients were treated with static cement spacer due to poor soft tissue condition. These 4 patients were excluded and overall 23 patients were included and analyzed. Overall success rate is 78.26%. 4 patients with recurrent infection were treated with additional surgical debridement. One patient with recurrent infection was treated with the second time two-stage arthroplasty. All of these patients were successful treated without further recurrent infection. Conclusion: We found that failure rate is increasing when considerate the failure between first stage and second stage surgery. In addition, patients without more than 36 months follow-up may have infection free due to honeymoon period but still in risk of reinfection.","PeriodicalId":100551,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"511 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6492/FJMD.201802_9(1).0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challengeable task. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a commonly used treatment for chronic PJI. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the successful rate and possible failure risk factors in patients undergoing a planned two-stage exchange arthroplasty for treatment of knee PJI. Methods: From March 2004 to February 2015, we retrospectively reviewed 35 patients have more than 36 months clinical follow-up with periprosthetic knee joint infections. The clinical outcomes were recorded to define the successful or fail treatment for the periprosthetic knee joint infections. Multiple factors such as obesity, comorbidities, diabetes, were recorded and analyzed to evaluate the risk factors of poor outcome. Results: Five patients were unable to receive second stage surgery with cement spacer retained due to variable reasons. Three patients ended with amputation due to uncontrolled infectious process. Overall 27 patients received two-stage exchange arthroplasty to treat knee PJI were analyzed in this study. However, two patients were loss follow-up during the period between 1st and 2nd time surgery. Two patients were treated with static cement spacer due to poor soft tissue condition. These 4 patients were excluded and overall 23 patients were included and analyzed. Overall success rate is 78.26%. 4 patients with recurrent infection were treated with additional surgical debridement. One patient with recurrent infection was treated with the second time two-stage arthroplasty. All of these patients were successful treated without further recurrent infection. Conclusion: We found that failure rate is increasing when considerate the failure between first stage and second stage surgery. In addition, patients without more than 36 months follow-up may have infection free due to honeymoon period but still in risk of reinfection.
二期全膝关节置换术治疗人工膝关节感染的中期疗效
全膝关节置换术(TKA)后假体周围关节感染(PJI)的治疗是一项具有挑战性的任务。两期关节置换术是慢性PJI的常用治疗方法。目的:本研究的目的是探讨计划两期置换关节置换术治疗膝关节PJI患者的成功率和可能失败的危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2004年3月至2015年2月35例假体周围膝关节感染患者,临床随访36个月以上。记录临床结果以确定假体周围膝关节感染治疗的成功或失败。对肥胖、合并症、糖尿病等多因素进行记录和分析,以评价不良预后的危险因素。结果:5例患者由于各种原因无法进行二期手术,并保留了骨水泥隔离剂。3例患者因感染过程失控而截肢。本研究共分析了27例接受两期置换关节置换术治疗膝关节PJI的患者。然而,2例患者在第一次和第二次手术期间失去随访。2例患者因软组织状况不佳,采用静态骨水泥间隔器治疗。排除这4例患者,共纳入23例患者进行分析。总体成功率为78.26%。4例复发感染患者行手术清创治疗。1例复发性感染患者接受第二次二期关节置换术治疗。所有患者均获得成功治疗,无进一步复发感染。结论:考虑到一期和二期手术之间的失败,手术失败率呈上升趋势。此外,随访未超过36个月的患者可能由于蜜月期而无感染,但仍有再次感染的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信