Categorical and gradational: alternative survey measures of sex and gender

IF 2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Aliya Saperstein, Laurel Westbrook
{"title":"Categorical and gradational: alternative survey measures of sex and gender","authors":"Aliya Saperstein, Laurel Westbrook","doi":"10.1332/251510820x15995647280686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Demands for recognition of gender diversity and transgender people are growing. We tested non-binary sex and gender measures using nationally representative samples of US adults to assess feasibility for general population surveys. We find more support for a two-step categorical approach,\n with separate questions about natal sex and gender identity, than for a single question assessing transgender status as the latter was less reliable within our online surveys and over time. We also consider the challenge of determining measurement reliability for fluid characteristics and\n argue that using categorical and gradational gender measures in combination should become standard practice.","PeriodicalId":36315,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/251510820x15995647280686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Demands for recognition of gender diversity and transgender people are growing. We tested non-binary sex and gender measures using nationally representative samples of US adults to assess feasibility for general population surveys. We find more support for a two-step categorical approach, with separate questions about natal sex and gender identity, than for a single question assessing transgender status as the latter was less reliable within our online surveys and over time. We also consider the challenge of determining measurement reliability for fluid characteristics and argue that using categorical and gradational gender measures in combination should become standard practice.
分类和分级:性别和社会性别的替代调查措施
对性别多样性和跨性别者的认可的需求正在增长。我们使用具有全国代表性的美国成年人样本测试了非二元性和性别测量,以评估一般人口调查的可行性。我们发现,两步分类法(关于出生性别和性别认同的单独问题)比单一问题评估跨性别状态的方法更受支持,因为后者在我们的在线调查中和随着时间的推移不太可靠。我们还考虑了确定流体特性测量可靠性的挑战,并认为结合使用分类和分级性别测量应成为标准做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Politics and Gender
European Journal of Politics and Gender Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信