Navigate on the right?

W. Hudson
{"title":"Navigate on the right?","authors":"W. Hudson","doi":"10.1145/506320.506327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a recent HFI newsletter (URL below), Bob Bailey presented a case for moving web site navigation to the right-hand side of the page. The evidence he cited was a study by Kellener, Barnes and Lingard on the effects of scroll bar orientation plus his own unpublished research on behalf of the National Cancer Institute. The KB&L paper examined the relationship between item justification and vertical scroll bar placement within list boxes. They found both user performance and preference data supported scroll bar orientation consistent with item justification. That is, for left-justified items, users performed better and preferred a scroll bar on the left side. Similar results were found for right-justified items and scroll bars on the right side of the list box. However, these results are not very surprising given the very limited nature of the tests. They really act just as a confirmation of Fitt's Law: that the time to acquire a target is a function of its distance and size. Users simply had to move the mouse from the scroll bar at the right or IeR side to the nearest point of the item to be selected. Now maybe I am being a little fussy, but I personally would not be happy to extrapolate the KB & L results to web sites. It's not that I don't trust Fitt's Law, but I am not certain that users spend most of their time moving between the scroll bar and the navigation fields with a mouse. Scroll bars are extremely tiddly widgets to operate on a regular basis and I for one use them only as a last resort, preferring the keyboard for most of my vertical scrolling operations. This is an effect that was overlooked in the KB & L study, since participants were instructed to use the mouse. It may be that Bailey's own study was a little more open minded in this respect, but as the results are not publicly available, it is hard to say. Before we start moving navigation controls to the opposite side from their expected location, let's consider a few points: • Users may be scrolling with the keyboard. • Users may be scrolling with mouse wheels. • Users may not be moving between scroll bars and navigation fields as often as expected_ • The window origin is usually in the top leR, meaning that right edge varies in location according to …","PeriodicalId":7070,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigchi Bulletin","volume":"4 1","pages":"8 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigchi Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/506320.506327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In a recent HFI newsletter (URL below), Bob Bailey presented a case for moving web site navigation to the right-hand side of the page. The evidence he cited was a study by Kellener, Barnes and Lingard on the effects of scroll bar orientation plus his own unpublished research on behalf of the National Cancer Institute. The KB&L paper examined the relationship between item justification and vertical scroll bar placement within list boxes. They found both user performance and preference data supported scroll bar orientation consistent with item justification. That is, for left-justified items, users performed better and preferred a scroll bar on the left side. Similar results were found for right-justified items and scroll bars on the right side of the list box. However, these results are not very surprising given the very limited nature of the tests. They really act just as a confirmation of Fitt's Law: that the time to acquire a target is a function of its distance and size. Users simply had to move the mouse from the scroll bar at the right or IeR side to the nearest point of the item to be selected. Now maybe I am being a little fussy, but I personally would not be happy to extrapolate the KB & L results to web sites. It's not that I don't trust Fitt's Law, but I am not certain that users spend most of their time moving between the scroll bar and the navigation fields with a mouse. Scroll bars are extremely tiddly widgets to operate on a regular basis and I for one use them only as a last resort, preferring the keyboard for most of my vertical scrolling operations. This is an effect that was overlooked in the KB & L study, since participants were instructed to use the mouse. It may be that Bailey's own study was a little more open minded in this respect, but as the results are not publicly available, it is hard to say. Before we start moving navigation controls to the opposite side from their expected location, let's consider a few points: • Users may be scrolling with the keyboard. • Users may be scrolling with mouse wheels. • Users may not be moving between scroll bars and navigation fields as often as expected_ • The window origin is usually in the top leR, meaning that right edge varies in location according to …
靠右边导航?
在最近的HFI通讯(网址如下)中,Bob Bailey提出了一个将网站导航移动到页面右侧的案例。他引用的证据是Kellener, Barnes和Lingard关于滚动条方向影响的研究,以及他自己代表国家癌症研究所进行的未发表的研究。KB&L的论文研究了列表框中项目对齐和垂直滚动条放置之间的关系。他们发现用户性能和偏好数据都支持滚动条的方向与项目对齐一致。也就是说,对于左对齐项,用户表现更好,并且更喜欢左侧的滚动条。对于列表框右侧的右对齐项和滚动条也发现了类似的结果。然而,考虑到这些测试非常有限的性质,这些结果并不令人惊讶。它们实际上只是证实了菲特定律:获取目标的时间是其距离和大小的函数。用户只需将鼠标从右侧或左侧的滚动条移动到要选择的项目的最近点。现在也许我有点挑剔了,但我个人不会乐意将知识库和知识库的结果外推到网站上。这并不是说我不相信Fitt定律,而是我不确定用户是否花了大部分时间用鼠标在滚动条和导航栏之间移动。滚动条是一种非常繁琐的小部件,很难经常操作,我只是在最后关头才使用它们,在大多数垂直滚动操作中,我更喜欢使用键盘。这是一个在KB和L研究中被忽略的影响,因为参与者被指示使用鼠标。也许贝利自己的研究在这方面更开放一些,但由于研究结果没有公开,所以很难说。在我们开始将导航控件从预期位置移动到另一边之前,让我们考虑几点:•用户可能会使用键盘滚动。•用户可能正在使用鼠标滚轮滚动。•用户可能不会像预期的那样经常在滚动条和导航栏之间移动_•窗口原点通常在顶部leR中,这意味着右边缘的位置会根据……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信