Rejuvenating Handil Shallow Gravel Pack Wells with Effective Matrix Stimulation using Organic Clay Acid: Challenges, Lessons Learned, Results and Way Forward for Mature Fields Abstract

I. Primasari, Geraldie Lukman Wijaya, Aen Nuril Hadi, Lusiana Chendrika, Putu Astari Merati
{"title":"Rejuvenating Handil Shallow Gravel Pack Wells with Effective Matrix Stimulation using Organic Clay Acid: Challenges, Lessons Learned, Results and Way Forward for Mature Fields Abstract","authors":"I. Primasari, Geraldie Lukman Wijaya, Aen Nuril Hadi, Lusiana Chendrika, Putu Astari Merati","doi":"10.2118/193175-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Handil is a mature oil and gas field with dozens of wells drilled within 70-m distance. It has been developed since 1975 and operated by Indonesian national oil company, PT Pertamina Hulu Mahakam. Handil shallow reservoirs are located at depths between 200 and 1500 m true vertical depth (TVD). It has strong aquifer support and unconsolidated permeable sandstone reservoirs with poorly sorted grain size, requiring gravel pack completion. Since 2005, there have been 39 wells completed with gravel pack, contributing 40% of total Handil field production. Handil gravel pack wells are facing productivity impairment; several production tests indicated that 30% of the completed zones have a very low productivity index (less than 0.5 STB/D/psi) after a few years of production.\n Organic clay acid (OCA) was proposed as a matrix acidizing technology to dissolve the fines in the critical near-wellbore matrix. For many years, matrix acidizing has been used to remove formation damage or improve productivity in formations containing siliceous clay. The most commonly used treatment fluid is mud acid, which is a mixture of hydrofluoric acid (HF) and hydrochloric acid (HCl). In many conventional mud acid treatments, after an initially good response to the treatment, the production falls to levels similar to those before the treatment; this is thought to be due to the precipitation from the reaction of HF with silica material on feldspar/clay, which results in more hydrated silica gel. Unlike conventional mud acid, OCA can allow a deeper live-acid penetration into the formation and limit possible reaction-product precipitates, which will enhance the effectiveness of the stimulation treatments.\n Two OCA trial treatments were executed through coiled tubing. In the first job, the chemicals created an emulsion that was not compatible with fluid on the surface facilities. Demulsifier treatment on the surface successfully diluted the emulsion. Some adjustments on chemical composition have been applied on the second job, which successfully removed the emulsion. The pilot test yielded total oil production up to 900 BOPD (4,000 BLPD) instantaneous gain with ~80% improvement on productivity by reducing skin from >100 to 5. Currently, both wells are still flowing after 6 months of production. Following this success story, more than 11 OCA jobs are planned to improve the productivity of the existing zones in 2018.\n A recent matrix acidizing campaign in Handil shallow wells, highlighting the damage verification, candidate selection, acid chemistry, operational constraints, production results, and future opportunities. The logistics which include the flowback of spent acids and acid neutralization in the swamp area, and the addition of demulsifier in surface facilities will also be discussed. There were no core samples available to run a formation response test to the acid prior to the matrix acidizing treatment.","PeriodicalId":11208,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193175-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Handil is a mature oil and gas field with dozens of wells drilled within 70-m distance. It has been developed since 1975 and operated by Indonesian national oil company, PT Pertamina Hulu Mahakam. Handil shallow reservoirs are located at depths between 200 and 1500 m true vertical depth (TVD). It has strong aquifer support and unconsolidated permeable sandstone reservoirs with poorly sorted grain size, requiring gravel pack completion. Since 2005, there have been 39 wells completed with gravel pack, contributing 40% of total Handil field production. Handil gravel pack wells are facing productivity impairment; several production tests indicated that 30% of the completed zones have a very low productivity index (less than 0.5 STB/D/psi) after a few years of production. Organic clay acid (OCA) was proposed as a matrix acidizing technology to dissolve the fines in the critical near-wellbore matrix. For many years, matrix acidizing has been used to remove formation damage or improve productivity in formations containing siliceous clay. The most commonly used treatment fluid is mud acid, which is a mixture of hydrofluoric acid (HF) and hydrochloric acid (HCl). In many conventional mud acid treatments, after an initially good response to the treatment, the production falls to levels similar to those before the treatment; this is thought to be due to the precipitation from the reaction of HF with silica material on feldspar/clay, which results in more hydrated silica gel. Unlike conventional mud acid, OCA can allow a deeper live-acid penetration into the formation and limit possible reaction-product precipitates, which will enhance the effectiveness of the stimulation treatments. Two OCA trial treatments were executed through coiled tubing. In the first job, the chemicals created an emulsion that was not compatible with fluid on the surface facilities. Demulsifier treatment on the surface successfully diluted the emulsion. Some adjustments on chemical composition have been applied on the second job, which successfully removed the emulsion. The pilot test yielded total oil production up to 900 BOPD (4,000 BLPD) instantaneous gain with ~80% improvement on productivity by reducing skin from >100 to 5. Currently, both wells are still flowing after 6 months of production. Following this success story, more than 11 OCA jobs are planned to improve the productivity of the existing zones in 2018. A recent matrix acidizing campaign in Handil shallow wells, highlighting the damage verification, candidate selection, acid chemistry, operational constraints, production results, and future opportunities. The logistics which include the flowback of spent acids and acid neutralization in the swamp area, and the addition of demulsifier in surface facilities will also be discussed. There were no core samples available to run a formation response test to the acid prior to the matrix acidizing treatment.
利用有机粘土酸对Handil浅层砾石充填井进行有效基质增产:成熟油田面临的挑战、经验教训、成果和未来发展方向
Handil是一个成熟的油气田,在70米范围内钻了几十口井。它自1975年开始开发,由印度尼西亚国家石油公司PT Pertamina Hulu Mahakam运营。Handil浅层油藏位于200 - 1500米的真垂直深度(TVD)之间。该油藏具有较强的含水层支撑和松散的渗透性砂岩储层,且粒度分选差,需要砾石充填完井。自2005年以来,已经完成了39口砾石充填井,占Handil油田总产量的40%。Handil砾石充填井面临产能下降的问题;一些生产测试表明,30%的已完工层在生产几年后的产能指数非常低(低于0.5 STB/D/psi)。提出了有机粘土酸(OCA)作为基质酸化技术,以溶解临界近井基质中的细粒。多年来,基质酸化一直被用于消除含硅粘土地层的地层损害或提高产能。最常用的处理液是泥浆酸,它是氢氟酸(HF)和盐酸(HCl)的混合物。在许多常规泥浆酸化处理中,在处理初期效果良好后,产量下降到与处理前相似的水平;这被认为是由于HF与硅材料在长石/粘土上反应产生的沉淀,导致更多的水合硅胶。与传统的泥浆酸不同,OCA可以使活性酸更深地渗透到地层中,并限制可能的反应产物沉淀,这将提高增产处理的有效性。通过连续油管进行了两次OCA试验处理。在第一次作业中,化学物质产生了一种乳剂,与地面设施上的液体不相容。表面破乳剂处理成功稀释了乳化液。在第二次作业中对化学成分进行了一些调整,成功地去除了乳化液。先导试验的产油量瞬时增加了900桶/天(4000桶/天),将表皮从>100降低到5,产能提高了约80%。目前,这两口井在投产6个月后仍在生产。在这个成功的故事之后,2018年计划有超过11个OCA工作岗位来提高现有区域的生产力。最近在Handil浅井进行了基质酸化作业,重点介绍了损害验证、候选物选择、酸化学、操作限制、生产结果和未来机会。讨论了沼泽地区废酸返排、酸中和、地面设施中添加破乳剂等物流问题。在基质酸化处理之前,没有可用的岩心样品对酸进行地层响应测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信