Environmental remediation in foreign countries: experience of legal regulation

A. K. Akhmadiev, V. N. Ekzaryan
{"title":"Environmental remediation in foreign countries: experience of legal regulation","authors":"A. K. Akhmadiev, V. N. Ekzaryan","doi":"10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-4-88-97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Environmental remediation plays an important role in mitigating or eliminating environmental damage. The worldwide experience in organising and regulating ecosystem recovery activity is of interest.Aim. An extensive comparative analysis of the particularities of legal regulation in the sphere of environmental remediation in foreign countries.Materials and methods. The study was based on three major criteria: the environmental remediation enshrined in law; the provision of the term “remediation” or its equivalent; identifying the objects of remediation. The analysis was based on the examination of the legal information registers and official government and parliament resources of over 20 countries worldwide. The study covers the period from 1970 to 2019, because since the 1970s, one can speak about the widespread implementation of environmental laws. In individual cases, the first mentioning of the current environmental law was taken as a starting point.Results. Based on the results of the study, the countries were divided into two categories. The first group was dominated by the vertical environmental legislation system and the second — by the horizontal one. The authors described the features of each group and identified the characteristic features of environmental remediation management. These features include the requirements for remediation plans, action plans enshrined in the law, introduction of special cadastre, importance ranking of remediation objects, etc. Formulating a universal interpretation of the “environmental remediation” term is another significant result of this study.Conclusions. The study showed that the need for and importance of environmental remediation is recognised worldwide. In the meantime, it is necessary to identify the principles of environmental remediation and to systematise approaches to ecosystem restoration.","PeriodicalId":33343,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Geologiia i razvedka","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Geologiia i razvedka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-4-88-97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Environmental remediation plays an important role in mitigating or eliminating environmental damage. The worldwide experience in organising and regulating ecosystem recovery activity is of interest.Aim. An extensive comparative analysis of the particularities of legal regulation in the sphere of environmental remediation in foreign countries.Materials and methods. The study was based on three major criteria: the environmental remediation enshrined in law; the provision of the term “remediation” or its equivalent; identifying the objects of remediation. The analysis was based on the examination of the legal information registers and official government and parliament resources of over 20 countries worldwide. The study covers the period from 1970 to 2019, because since the 1970s, one can speak about the widespread implementation of environmental laws. In individual cases, the first mentioning of the current environmental law was taken as a starting point.Results. Based on the results of the study, the countries were divided into two categories. The first group was dominated by the vertical environmental legislation system and the second — by the horizontal one. The authors described the features of each group and identified the characteristic features of environmental remediation management. These features include the requirements for remediation plans, action plans enshrined in the law, introduction of special cadastre, importance ranking of remediation objects, etc. Formulating a universal interpretation of the “environmental remediation” term is another significant result of this study.Conclusions. The study showed that the need for and importance of environmental remediation is recognised worldwide. In the meantime, it is necessary to identify the principles of environmental remediation and to systematise approaches to ecosystem restoration.
国外环境整治:法律规制的经验
背景。环境修复在减轻或消除环境损害方面具有重要作用。世界范围内组织和调节生态系统恢复活动的经验令人感兴趣。对国外环境修复领域法律规制的特殊性进行了广泛的比较分析。材料和方法。这项研究基于三个主要标准:法律规定的环境修复;提供“补救”一词或与其相当的词语;确定补救的对象。这一分析是基于对全世界20多个国家的法律信息登记册和官方政府和议会资源的审查。这项研究涵盖了从1970年到2019年的时期,因为自20世纪70年代以来,人们可以说环境法的广泛实施。在个别案例中,以第一次提及现行环境法为起点。根据研究结果,这些国家被分为两类。第一类以纵向环境立法体系为主,第二类以横向环境立法体系为主。作者描述了每一类的特征,并确定了环境修复管理的特征。这些特征包括修复计划的要求、法律规定的行动计划、特殊地籍的引入、修复对象的重要性排序等。制定“环境修复”术语的通用解释是本研究的另一个重要成果。研究表明,环境修复的必要性和重要性在世界范围内是公认的。同时,需要明确环境修复的原则,建立系统的生态系统修复方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信