Comparison of Dynamic Models for Non-Contact Micromanipulation Based on Dielectrophoretic Actuation

Vladimir Gauthier, A. Bolopion, M. Gauthier
{"title":"Comparison of Dynamic Models for Non-Contact Micromanipulation Based on Dielectrophoretic Actuation","authors":"Vladimir Gauthier, A. Bolopion, M. Gauthier","doi":"10.1109/IROS.2018.8594377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several approaches are proposed in the literature to calculate the drag force, the electric field and the induced dielectrophoretic force. This paper analyzes the performances of various models for closed loop control of dielectrophoretic systems in comparison with experiments. This article compares their performance in terms of accuracy, computation time, and memory consumption. Four classical approaches are available to calculate the electric field. Their performances are analyzed in the paper. We have shown that combining the dipolar model of dielectrophoresis force with an anisotropic drag force (integrating the wall-effect) provides an interesting ratio precision/computation time. This paper provides an original comparison of several models described in literature whose performances have been compared with experiments.","PeriodicalId":6640,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)","volume":"51 1","pages":"4869-4874"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8594377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several approaches are proposed in the literature to calculate the drag force, the electric field and the induced dielectrophoretic force. This paper analyzes the performances of various models for closed loop control of dielectrophoretic systems in comparison with experiments. This article compares their performance in terms of accuracy, computation time, and memory consumption. Four classical approaches are available to calculate the electric field. Their performances are analyzed in the paper. We have shown that combining the dipolar model of dielectrophoresis force with an anisotropic drag force (integrating the wall-effect) provides an interesting ratio precision/computation time. This paper provides an original comparison of several models described in literature whose performances have been compared with experiments.
基于介电泳驱动的非接触微操作动力学模型比较
文献中提出了几种计算阻力、电场和感应介电泳力的方法。本文分析了各种介电泳系统闭环控制模型的性能,并与实验进行了比较。本文从准确性、计算时间和内存消耗方面比较了它们的性能。计算电场的经典方法有四种。本文对它们的性能进行了分析。我们已经证明,将介电泳力的偶极模型与各向异性阻力(整合壁效应)相结合,可以提供一个有趣的精度/计算时间比。本文对文献中描述的几种模型进行了原创性的比较,并将其性能与实验进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信