Water Rights Dilemma in Indonesia: Coase Theorem and Game Theory Approach

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Andar Ristabet Hesda
{"title":"Water Rights Dilemma in Indonesia: Coase Theorem and Game Theory Approach","authors":"Andar Ristabet Hesda","doi":"10.22146/jieb.v37i1.1400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Main Objectives: This paper aims to explain Indonesia's water rights dilemma and propose a potential solution to solve it using the Coasian and game theory approaches. Background Problems: Developing a mechanism that supports the citizens (and farmers) in the area surrounding water plants, maintains firm productivity, builds social cohesion, and promotes environmental improvement remains an ongoing concern. Novelty: This study utilizes the Coasian and game theory approaches to solve Indonesia's water rights dilemma. Research Methods: This research employs a game theory simulation representing the Coasian strategy in handling externalities. Findings/Results: The implementation of Coasian bargaining might be promising in solving the water rights dilemma in Indonesia. The necessary condition is high farmer commitment during the bargaining process, and the sufficient condition is a reduction of transaction costs. Conclusion: The strategies in lowering transaction costs can be accomplished by establishing an independent multidisciplinary research team, involving a government element as a mediatory body, and creating an advisory firm. This research team would aim to close the gap in institutional deficiency. The government would have a significant role in reducing the transaction cost by defining, enforcing, and transferring property rights. Lastly, the advisory firm would help to focus all business activities, operationalize agreements, and conduct monitoring.","PeriodicalId":31597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v37i1.1400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: This paper aims to explain Indonesia's water rights dilemma and propose a potential solution to solve it using the Coasian and game theory approaches. Background Problems: Developing a mechanism that supports the citizens (and farmers) in the area surrounding water plants, maintains firm productivity, builds social cohesion, and promotes environmental improvement remains an ongoing concern. Novelty: This study utilizes the Coasian and game theory approaches to solve Indonesia's water rights dilemma. Research Methods: This research employs a game theory simulation representing the Coasian strategy in handling externalities. Findings/Results: The implementation of Coasian bargaining might be promising in solving the water rights dilemma in Indonesia. The necessary condition is high farmer commitment during the bargaining process, and the sufficient condition is a reduction of transaction costs. Conclusion: The strategies in lowering transaction costs can be accomplished by establishing an independent multidisciplinary research team, involving a government element as a mediatory body, and creating an advisory firm. This research team would aim to close the gap in institutional deficiency. The government would have a significant role in reducing the transaction cost by defining, enforcing, and transferring property rights. Lastly, the advisory firm would help to focus all business activities, operationalize agreements, and conduct monitoring.
印度尼西亚水权困境:科斯定理与博弈论方法
引言/主要目的:本文旨在解释印度尼西亚的水权困境,并提出一个潜在的解决方案,以解决它使用科斯亚和博弈论的方法。背景问题:建立一个支持水厂周边地区居民(和农民)的机制,保持稳定的生产力,建立社会凝聚力,促进环境改善仍然是一个持续关注的问题。新颖性:本研究运用科斯亚理论和博弈论的方法来解决印尼的水权困境。研究方法:本研究采用博弈论模拟科斯亚策略处理外部性。发现/结果:实施科斯讨价还价可能有望解决印度尼西亚的水权困境。其必要条件是农户在议价过程中的高承诺,充分条件是交易成本的降低。结论:降低交易成本的策略可以通过建立独立的多学科研究团队、政府作为中介机构、成立咨询公司来实现。这个研究小组的目标是缩小制度缺陷方面的差距。政府将通过界定、执行和转让产权,在降低交易成本方面发挥重要作用。最后,咨询公司将帮助集中所有业务活动,执行协议和进行监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书