Newman Procedure dalam Menganalisis Kesalahan Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Setara PISA

Edumatika Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI:10.32939/EJRPM.V2I1.283
Susanti Susanti
{"title":"Newman Procedure dalam Menganalisis Kesalahan Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Setara PISA","authors":"Susanti Susanti","doi":"10.32939/EJRPM.V2I1.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify students’ errors in solving problem equals to PISA’s based on Newman procedures. Qualitative-descriptive research was used in conducting this study and the subjects were third-grade students at SMP Unggul Sigli in year 2017/2018. Data was collected using tests and interviews. The instrument of this study was a sheet consisting of 5 (five) mathematical questions that composed equivalent to PISA’s problem. Analyzing students’ errors was guided by analyzing procedures developed by Newman which contain 5 (five) kinds of error, they are (1) reading error; (2) understanding error; (3) transformation error; (4) processing skill error; and (5) writing error. The result showed the percentage of each kind of errors made by students which detailed as follows, reading error comprised 37,1% of students; error in problem understanding made up 47%; 73% of subjects made error in transforming; 80% of students had error in processing; and error in writing final answer made up 78,1% of them. By analyzing the percentage, it is identified that the three most common mistakes are processing error, transformation error, and error in writing a final answer.","PeriodicalId":34056,"journal":{"name":"Edumatika","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edumatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32939/EJRPM.V2I1.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to identify students’ errors in solving problem equals to PISA’s based on Newman procedures. Qualitative-descriptive research was used in conducting this study and the subjects were third-grade students at SMP Unggul Sigli in year 2017/2018. Data was collected using tests and interviews. The instrument of this study was a sheet consisting of 5 (five) mathematical questions that composed equivalent to PISA’s problem. Analyzing students’ errors was guided by analyzing procedures developed by Newman which contain 5 (five) kinds of error, they are (1) reading error; (2) understanding error; (3) transformation error; (4) processing skill error; and (5) writing error. The result showed the percentage of each kind of errors made by students which detailed as follows, reading error comprised 37,1% of students; error in problem understanding made up 47%; 73% of subjects made error in transforming; 80% of students had error in processing; and error in writing final answer made up 78,1% of them. By analyzing the percentage, it is identified that the three most common mistakes are processing error, transformation error, and error in writing a final answer.
纽曼流程,分析中学生在解决类似比萨问题上的错误
本研究的目的是找出学生在解决问题等于PISA的纽曼程序的错误。本研究采用定性描述研究方法进行,研究对象为2017/2018年度龙谷四里小学三年级学生。通过测试和访谈收集数据。这项研究的工具是一张由5(5)个数学问题组成的表格,这些问题相当于PISA的问题。分析学生的错误以Newman开发的分析程序为指导,该程序包含5种错误,它们是:(1)阅读错误;(2)理解错误;(3)变换误差;(4)加工技能错误;(5)书写错误。结果显示了学生所犯的各种错误的百分比,具体如下:阅读错误占学生的37.1%;问题理解错误占47%;73%的被试在转换过程中出现错误;80%的学生有加工错误;最终答案的书写错误占78.1%。通过分析百分比,可以确定三个最常见的错误是处理错误、转换错误和写最终答案时的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信