Privatization and Firm Performance: a Study of Indonesia’s State-owned Enterprises

Fransiska Soejono, H. Heriyanto
{"title":"Privatization and Firm Performance: a Study of Indonesia’s State-owned Enterprises","authors":"Fransiska Soejono, H. Heriyanto","doi":"10.15294/JDM.V9I2.14970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the differences in the company’s performance before and after privatization. This study also examined the differences in performance before and after privatization on specific sub-samples of the data which is based on privatization method. Government policy of carrying out the privatization toward SOEs is still pro and contra. Various Privatization methods offer its weaknesses and strengths. There are different opinions on the best method for SOE privatization in Indonesia. The population is all companies which execute the privatization method. Secondary data were used namely financial statement which was taken from the Indonesia Stock Exchange, and the company’s website. Data were analyzed using normality test data. In addition, the paired t-test by using normally distributed data assumption was used to test the hypothesis. The results showed that Direct method privatization positive and significant changes in measuring Total Asset Turnover. Performance conducted Privatization through the capital markets showed different results. Test on the capital market method of data showed a similar effect with an analysis on the entire data (without separating the privatization method used) that occur significant performance degradation, especially in measuring Total Asset Turnover, Debt Ratio and Return On Equity. Conducted Management/ Employee Buy-Out (MBO) privatization implied a substantial reduction in measuring Debt Ratio and Return on Equity Performance.","PeriodicalId":30522,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/JDM.V9I2.14970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the differences in the company’s performance before and after privatization. This study also examined the differences in performance before and after privatization on specific sub-samples of the data which is based on privatization method. Government policy of carrying out the privatization toward SOEs is still pro and contra. Various Privatization methods offer its weaknesses and strengths. There are different opinions on the best method for SOE privatization in Indonesia. The population is all companies which execute the privatization method. Secondary data were used namely financial statement which was taken from the Indonesia Stock Exchange, and the company’s website. Data were analyzed using normality test data. In addition, the paired t-test by using normally distributed data assumption was used to test the hypothesis. The results showed that Direct method privatization positive and significant changes in measuring Total Asset Turnover. Performance conducted Privatization through the capital markets showed different results. Test on the capital market method of data showed a similar effect with an analysis on the entire data (without separating the privatization method used) that occur significant performance degradation, especially in measuring Total Asset Turnover, Debt Ratio and Return On Equity. Conducted Management/ Employee Buy-Out (MBO) privatization implied a substantial reduction in measuring Debt Ratio and Return on Equity Performance.
私有化与企业绩效:对印尼国有企业的研究
本研究旨在探讨私有化前后公司绩效的差异。本研究还考察了基于私有化方法的数据的特定子样本在私有化前后的绩效差异。政府对国有企业实行民营化的政策仍然是正反对立的。各种私有化方式各有优缺点。印尼国有企业私有化的最佳方式存在不同的观点。人口是所有实行私有化方法的公司。次要数据被使用,即财务报表取自印度尼西亚证券交易所,以及公司的网站。数据采用正态性检验数据进行分析。此外,采用正态分布数据假设的配对t检验对假设进行检验。结果表明,直接法私有化对总资产周转率的测量有显著的正向影响。通过资本市场进行的民营化表现出不同的效果。对资本市场数据方法的测试表明,对整个数据(不分离所使用的私有化方法)的分析也产生了类似的效果,这些数据出现了显著的性能下降,特别是在衡量总资产周转率、负债率和股本回报率方面。进行管理层/员工收购(MBO)私有化意味着衡量负债率和股本回报率的大幅减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信