History of biology in relation to breeding, evolution and genetics

R. Piskun, I. M. Molchan, V. M. Shkarupa, N. M. Hrynchak, O. Sprut, T. B. Vasenko
{"title":"History of biology in relation to breeding, evolution and genetics","authors":"R. Piskun, I. M. Molchan, V. M. Shkarupa, N. M. Hrynchak, O. Sprut, T. B. Vasenko","doi":"10.7124/feeo.v30.1475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To investigate and reveal the peculiarities of the history of development of biology branches such as breeding, evolution and genetics, associated with the names of well-known scientists who worked during the totalitarian dictatorial regime of the Soviet Union. Methods. Literature, letters and archival documents search and study. Comparison, analysis and evaluation of data obtained. Results. In the 30–60s of the last century, the process of influence of genetics on breeding and of breeding on genetics and on evolution in general was widely discussed among biologists. Unfortunately, the party bodies of that time intervened in the discussion, which led to an artificial division of biology as the science into alternative mutually exclusive \"isms\". Different \"isms\" are the result of a highly specialized approach to scientific activity and an artificial division of a single nature; these are different points of view that characterize different levels of research, which contain elements of truth but lead to nonsense and errors when they are exalted to the absolute. During the years of the cult of personality, a lack of understanding of the natural course of development of any science led to tragic consequences both in the genetics itself and in the fate of its carriers, geneticists. When the practice of the heavy-handed development of genetics in our country was overcome and condemned, it became clear that the union of genetics and breeding can only grow on the basis of a deep interpenetration of these sciences. Conclusions. Further development of breeding, genetics and evolution is associated with the development of a new scientific paradigm. A possible basis for a new scientific paradigm at the present stage may be the epigenetic theory of evolution, which in recent decades has been formed into an independent science called epigenetics and stands at the forefront of applied and medical biology.","PeriodicalId":12181,"journal":{"name":"Faktori eksperimental'noi evolucii organizmiv","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faktori eksperimental'noi evolucii organizmiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7124/feeo.v30.1475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To investigate and reveal the peculiarities of the history of development of biology branches such as breeding, evolution and genetics, associated with the names of well-known scientists who worked during the totalitarian dictatorial regime of the Soviet Union. Methods. Literature, letters and archival documents search and study. Comparison, analysis and evaluation of data obtained. Results. In the 30–60s of the last century, the process of influence of genetics on breeding and of breeding on genetics and on evolution in general was widely discussed among biologists. Unfortunately, the party bodies of that time intervened in the discussion, which led to an artificial division of biology as the science into alternative mutually exclusive "isms". Different "isms" are the result of a highly specialized approach to scientific activity and an artificial division of a single nature; these are different points of view that characterize different levels of research, which contain elements of truth but lead to nonsense and errors when they are exalted to the absolute. During the years of the cult of personality, a lack of understanding of the natural course of development of any science led to tragic consequences both in the genetics itself and in the fate of its carriers, geneticists. When the practice of the heavy-handed development of genetics in our country was overcome and condemned, it became clear that the union of genetics and breeding can only grow on the basis of a deep interpenetration of these sciences. Conclusions. Further development of breeding, genetics and evolution is associated with the development of a new scientific paradigm. A possible basis for a new scientific paradigm at the present stage may be the epigenetic theory of evolution, which in recent decades has been formed into an independent science called epigenetics and stands at the forefront of applied and medical biology.
与繁殖、进化和遗传学有关的生物学史
的目标。调查和揭示生物学分支发展历史的特点,如育种、进化和遗传学,与在苏联极权独裁政权期间工作的知名科学家的名字有关。方法。文献、信件和档案资料的检索和研究。对获得的数据进行比较、分析和评价。结果。在上世纪30 - 60年代,生物学家广泛讨论了遗传学对育种、育种对遗传学和进化的影响过程。不幸的是,当时的党的机构介入了讨论,这导致了人为地将生物学作为一门科学划分为相互排斥的“主义”。不同的“主义”是对科学活动采取高度专业化的方法和人为划分单一性质的结果;这些不同的观点代表了不同层次的研究,它们包含真理的元素,但当它们被提升到绝对时,就会导致无意义和错误。在个人崇拜的年代里,缺乏对任何科学发展的自然过程的理解,导致了遗传学本身及其载体遗传学家的命运的悲剧性后果。当我国对遗传学的高压发展的做法被克服和谴责时,很明显,遗传学和育种的结合只能在这些科学的深度相互渗透的基础上发展。结论。育种、遗传学和进化的进一步发展与新的科学范式的发展有关。现阶段新科学范式的可能基础可能是进化的表观遗传理论,它在最近几十年已形成一门独立的科学,称为表观遗传学,站在应用生物学和医学生物学的前沿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信