Reactive or proactive contact lens fitting — does it make a difference?

BSc, FCOptom, DCLP, DOrth, FAAO Lyndon Jones , BSc, FCOptom, DCLP Deborah Jones , BSc, MCOptom Claire Langley , BSc, DOpt Mark Houlford
{"title":"Reactive or proactive contact lens fitting — does it make a difference?","authors":"BSc, FCOptom, DCLP, DOrth, FAAO Lyndon Jones ,&nbsp;BSc, FCOptom, DCLP Deborah Jones ,&nbsp;BSc, MCOptom Claire Langley ,&nbsp;BSc, DOpt Mark Houlford","doi":"10.1016/S0141-7037(96)80031-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Four practitioners each noted the details of 40 successive non-contact lens-wearing patients who consulted them for a routine eye examination. The subjects were divided into two equal groups. In the first group contact lenses were only discussed if the subjects solicited the discussion and in the other group subjects were actively encouraged to try contact lenses. Interested subjects were fitted with a monthly disposable lens and dismissed for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks the patients were asked if they would like to continue with lenses, which they would subsequently have to pay for. Approximately six times more contact lens patients were fitted with contact lenses by adopting a proactive approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","volume":"19 2","pages":"Pages 41-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0141-7037(96)80031-0","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141703796800310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Four practitioners each noted the details of 40 successive non-contact lens-wearing patients who consulted them for a routine eye examination. The subjects were divided into two equal groups. In the first group contact lenses were only discussed if the subjects solicited the discussion and in the other group subjects were actively encouraged to try contact lenses. Interested subjects were fitted with a monthly disposable lens and dismissed for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks the patients were asked if they would like to continue with lenses, which they would subsequently have to pay for. Approximately six times more contact lens patients were fitted with contact lenses by adopting a proactive approach.

被动配戴隐形眼镜和主动配戴隐形眼镜有区别吗?
四名医生分别记录了40名连续咨询他们进行常规眼科检查的非隐形眼镜患者的详细信息。受试者被分成两组。在第一组中,只有受试者主动提出讨论时才会讨论隐形眼镜,而在另一组中,受试者被积极鼓励尝试隐形眼镜。感兴趣的受试者每月佩戴一次性隐形眼镜,然后休息2周。两周后,研究人员询问患者是否愿意继续佩戴隐形眼镜,他们随后需要支付费用。通过采取积极主动的方法,配戴隐形眼镜的患者大约增加了六倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信