Effectiveness of Snags Mobilization in Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain

N. A. Muhanna
{"title":"Effectiveness of Snags Mobilization in Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain","authors":"N. A. Muhanna","doi":"10.29070/15/57740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine effectiveness of SNAGS Mobilization in Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain. Design: Randomized Control Trial Methodology: A total of 40 patients were included as per inclusion criteria and randomly assigned into two groups each having 20 patients. Group A was given SNAG consisted of stretching and strengthening exercises while Group B was given Ultrasound consisted of stretching and strengthening exercises for 4 weeks, 3 sessions per week one session per day. The patient‟s outcome measures were assessed by visual analog scale, ODI and Goniometry of Lumbar Range of Motion. Measurements were recorded before and after the end of the treatment period. Results: Results revealed that means and S.D of both group were significant (p=.000 ) statically but clinically the Group of patients treated with SNAGS along with stretching and strengthening exercises managed pain (pre=7.61±1.26, post=0.45±0.47), ODI(pre= 40±20.57 ,post= 9±4.69) and range of motion (flexion pre=31±6.01,post=52±10.12,extension pre=16±2.23,post=30±5.17 Rt side flexion pre=11±2.17,post=20±4.21 and lt. side flexion pre=10±2.85, post=21±4.33, Rt side rotation pre= 9±1.97,post=18±2.15) lt. side rotation pre=9±2.01,post=18±2.47 better than group of patient treated with Ultrasound along with stretching and strengthening exercises in terms of pain( pre=6.67±1.51,post=2.83±1.17), ODI (pre=43±21.62,post=25±12.8) and range of motion (flexion pre=25±5.95,post=37±10.56, extension pre=14±2.13,post=21±5.41, Rt side flexion pre=10± 2.15 post=15±2.28, lt Side flexion pre=12±2.75, post=18±2.96, Rt side rotation pre=9±1.90 post=15.±2.71, lt Side rotation pre=8±1.85, post=16±3.17. Conclusion: The result of study suggests that both SNAG and Ultrasound improves the symptoms of chronic Mechanical back pain. Better improvement was shown by SNAG group than Ultrasound group. Based on these results SNAG and Exercise should be the treatment of choice for chronic Mechanical Low back pain rather than Ultrasound with Exercise.","PeriodicalId":14911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29070/15/57740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: To determine effectiveness of SNAGS Mobilization in Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain. Design: Randomized Control Trial Methodology: A total of 40 patients were included as per inclusion criteria and randomly assigned into two groups each having 20 patients. Group A was given SNAG consisted of stretching and strengthening exercises while Group B was given Ultrasound consisted of stretching and strengthening exercises for 4 weeks, 3 sessions per week one session per day. The patient‟s outcome measures were assessed by visual analog scale, ODI and Goniometry of Lumbar Range of Motion. Measurements were recorded before and after the end of the treatment period. Results: Results revealed that means and S.D of both group were significant (p=.000 ) statically but clinically the Group of patients treated with SNAGS along with stretching and strengthening exercises managed pain (pre=7.61±1.26, post=0.45±0.47), ODI(pre= 40±20.57 ,post= 9±4.69) and range of motion (flexion pre=31±6.01,post=52±10.12,extension pre=16±2.23,post=30±5.17 Rt side flexion pre=11±2.17,post=20±4.21 and lt. side flexion pre=10±2.85, post=21±4.33, Rt side rotation pre= 9±1.97,post=18±2.15) lt. side rotation pre=9±2.01,post=18±2.47 better than group of patient treated with Ultrasound along with stretching and strengthening exercises in terms of pain( pre=6.67±1.51,post=2.83±1.17), ODI (pre=43±21.62,post=25±12.8) and range of motion (flexion pre=25±5.95,post=37±10.56, extension pre=14±2.13,post=21±5.41, Rt side flexion pre=10± 2.15 post=15±2.28, lt Side flexion pre=12±2.75, post=18±2.96, Rt side rotation pre=9±1.90 post=15.±2.71, lt Side rotation pre=8±1.85, post=16±3.17. Conclusion: The result of study suggests that both SNAG and Ultrasound improves the symptoms of chronic Mechanical back pain. Better improvement was shown by SNAG group than Ultrasound group. Based on these results SNAG and Exercise should be the treatment of choice for chronic Mechanical Low back pain rather than Ultrasound with Exercise.
慢性机械性腰痛的障碍活动的有效性
目的:确定SNAGS活动治疗慢性机械性腰痛的有效性。设计:随机对照试验方法:按纳入标准共纳入40例患者,随机分为两组,每组20例。A组给予SNAG拉伸和强化训练,B组给予超声拉伸和强化训练,为期4周,每周3次,每天1次。通过视觉模拟量表、ODI和腰椎活动度角测量法评估患者的预后。在治疗期结束前后分别记录测量结果。结果:两组的均值和标准差均有显著性差异(p=。在临床中,SNAGS联合拉伸和强化训练组的疼痛(前=7.61±1.26,后=0.45±0.47),ODI(前= 40±20.57,后= 9±4.69)和活动范围(前屈预=31±6.01,后=52±10.12,后伸预=16±2.23,后=30±5.17),右侧屈预=11±2.17,后=20±4.21,左侧屈预=10±2.85,后=21±4.33,在疼痛(pre= 6.67±1.51,post=2.83±1.17)、ODI (pre=43±21.62,post=25±12.8)和活动范围(屈曲预=25±5.95,post=37±10.56,伸展预=14±2.13,post=21±5.41,Rt侧屈曲预=10±2.15,post= 15±2.28,lt侧屈曲预=12±2.75,post=18±2.96,Rt侧旋转预=9±1.90,post= 15±2.71,侧旋前=8±1.85,后=16±3.17。结论:超声和SNAG均能改善慢性机械性腰痛的症状。SNAG组改善效果优于超声组。基于这些结果,SNAG和运动应该是慢性机械性腰痛的治疗选择,而不是超声和运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信