Comparison of Code Stroke Response Times Between Emergency Department and Inpatient Settings in a Primary Stroke Center

C. Assunção, Beth Chauncey Evers, C. Martins, K. Remmel
{"title":"Comparison of Code Stroke Response Times Between Emergency Department and Inpatient Settings in a Primary Stroke Center","authors":"C. Assunção, Beth Chauncey Evers, C. Martins, K. Remmel","doi":"10.14740/jnr688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In stroke, timeliness of care is essential for optimal patient outcomes. While opportunities for code response time improvements have been extensively documented in the medical literature, this retrospective study aimed at providing data and insights for the development of a quality improvement project in the same hospital, with the ultimate goal of increasing code stroke response speeds without compromising the quality of care. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from weekly code stroke review meetings between January and December 2020 from both the emergency department (ED), and inpatient settings from one Joint Commission certified Primary Stroke Center. All code stroke cases with a computed tomography (CT) scan were included. For cases that received tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), variables collected were time from code-to-CT scan start, code-to-tPA, from CT scan start to tPA, and from CT scan completion to tPA. For code stroke cases that did not receive tPA, variables collected were code-to-CT scan start, code-to-CT scan read, from CT scan start to CT scan read, and from CT scan completion to CT scan read. Then, the ED’s code stroke response times were compared with those in the inpatient setting by using a two-tailed t -test and a 95% confidence interval. Results: From a sample of 206 code stroke activations in 2020, 157 activations met the study’s criteria. For cases that received tPA, the difference in the mean code-to-CT start times between ED and the inpatient settings (9.01 and 24.99 min, respectively) was statistically significant with a P-value < 0.05. For cases that did not receive tPA, the differences between ED and the inpatient settings in the mean code-to-CT start times (14.25 and 30.74 min, respectively) and code-to-CT read times (34.25 and 54.95 min, respectively) were also statistically significant with a P-value < 0.05. Conclusion: This study highlights the urgent need to improve code-to-CT times in this hospital’s inpatient setting since ED code stroke times were markedly better from a statistical viewpoint. Improving the quality of care will have to address the evident delay in transporting inpatients to the CT scanner after a code stroke has been activated. J Neurol Res. 2021;11(3-4):47-53 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr688","PeriodicalId":16489,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology Research","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: In stroke, timeliness of care is essential for optimal patient outcomes. While opportunities for code response time improvements have been extensively documented in the medical literature, this retrospective study aimed at providing data and insights for the development of a quality improvement project in the same hospital, with the ultimate goal of increasing code stroke response speeds without compromising the quality of care. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from weekly code stroke review meetings between January and December 2020 from both the emergency department (ED), and inpatient settings from one Joint Commission certified Primary Stroke Center. All code stroke cases with a computed tomography (CT) scan were included. For cases that received tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), variables collected were time from code-to-CT scan start, code-to-tPA, from CT scan start to tPA, and from CT scan completion to tPA. For code stroke cases that did not receive tPA, variables collected were code-to-CT scan start, code-to-CT scan read, from CT scan start to CT scan read, and from CT scan completion to CT scan read. Then, the ED’s code stroke response times were compared with those in the inpatient setting by using a two-tailed t -test and a 95% confidence interval. Results: From a sample of 206 code stroke activations in 2020, 157 activations met the study’s criteria. For cases that received tPA, the difference in the mean code-to-CT start times between ED and the inpatient settings (9.01 and 24.99 min, respectively) was statistically significant with a P-value < 0.05. For cases that did not receive tPA, the differences between ED and the inpatient settings in the mean code-to-CT start times (14.25 and 30.74 min, respectively) and code-to-CT read times (34.25 and 54.95 min, respectively) were also statistically significant with a P-value < 0.05. Conclusion: This study highlights the urgent need to improve code-to-CT times in this hospital’s inpatient setting since ED code stroke times were markedly better from a statistical viewpoint. Improving the quality of care will have to address the evident delay in transporting inpatients to the CT scanner after a code stroke has been activated. J Neurol Res. 2021;11(3-4):47-53 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr688
某初级卒中中心急诊科与住院部脑卒中码反应时间的比较
背景:在脑卒中中,及时护理对患者的最佳预后至关重要。虽然在医学文献中已经广泛记录了代码响应时间改进的机会,但本回顾性研究旨在为同一家医院的质量改进项目的开发提供数据和见解,其最终目标是在不影响护理质量的情况下提高代码中风响应速度。方法:回顾性队列研究。数据收集于2020年1月至12月期间,来自急诊科(ED)和一个联合委员会认证的初级卒中中心的住院环境的每周代码卒中审查会议。所有经过计算机断层扫描(CT)的脑卒中病例均被纳入研究。对于接受组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)的病例,收集的变量为从编码到CT扫描开始、编码到tPA、从CT扫描开始到tPA、从CT扫描完成到tPA的时间。对于未接受tPA的码脑卒中病例,收集的变量为码到CT扫描开始、码到CT扫描读取、从CT扫描开始到CT扫描读取、从CT扫描完成到CT扫描读取。然后,通过使用双尾t检验和95%置信区间,将急诊科的代码中风反应时间与住院患者的代码中风反应时间进行比较。结果:从2020年206个脑卒中激活的样本中,157个激活符合研究标准。在接受tPA的病例中,ED与住院患者的平均编码- ct启动时间(分别为9.01 min和24.99 min)差异有统计学意义,p值< 0.05。在未接受tPA治疗的病例中,ED与住院组在编码到ct的平均启动时间(分别为14.25 min和30.74 min)和编码到ct的平均读取时间(分别为34.25 min和54.95 min)上的差异也有统计学意义,p值< 0.05。结论:本研究强调了迫切需要提高代码到ct的时间在该医院的住院设置,因为从统计的角度来看,ED代码卒中时间明显更好。提高护理质量必须解决在激活编码中风后将住院病人运送到CT扫描仪的明显延迟问题。中华神经科杂志。2021;11(3-4):47-53 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr688
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信