The Horizons of Being: The Metaphysics of Ibn al-ʿArabī in the Muqaddimat al-Qayṣarī

IF 0.4 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION
A. M. Oaks Takács
{"title":"The Horizons of Being: The Metaphysics of Ibn al-ʿArabī in the Muqaddimat al-Qayṣarī","authors":"A. M. Oaks Takács","doi":"10.1080/09596410.2022.2069363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Content and substance can be highly variable even when parallel dynamics are at play. The final section takes the discussion of prejudice beyond the Western sphere, dealing in Chapter 8 with the phenomenon of Islamic antisemitism and the Palestine–Israel conflict. Although there is a historical trajectory to Muslim antipathy toward Jews and Judaism, modern Islamic or, perhaps more accurately, Islamist antisemitism is more a product of ‘colonial and Nazi influences’ (149) and a legacy of political Islamist ideologues such as Syed Qutb (1906–1966). Hedges concludes that Muslims whose worldview is framed by Islamic antisemitism pose, arguably, ‘today’s greatest threat to Jews globally’ and that this worldview ‘belies more than a millennia [sic] of history in which Jews and Muslims have, in general, lived amicably side by side, often seeing Christians as a threat against them both’ (164). Chapter 9 examines Islamophobia in the Buddhist world, focussing on examples of ultranationalist and ‘fundamentalist’ Buddhism. This chapter includes a useful review of the theme of violence and war in relation to Buddhism and of the history of relations between Islam and Buddhism. It then focuses on two recent cases of Buddhist Islamophobia in action: Sri Lanka and Myanmar. As ever, the situations and contributing factors are complex, but the bottom line is that Muslims and Islam are perceived as a threatening ‘other’, and so become the subjects of threat and prejudicially motivated enmity. In Chapter 10, the focus shifts to the context of Hindu India and hatred stoked against Muslims, courtesy of their radicalized othering by the Hindutva ultra religio-nationalist movement currently dominant in Indian life and politics. The fourth section concludes with an Interlude discussing the possibility of regulating religious hatred. As mentioned above, the book ends with an epilogue that explores the subject of dialogue, civil rights and peacebuilding. This is a kind of antidote to the book’s understandably relentless negativity. Hedges has tackled an important and difficult subject. My only criticisms are that the text is, at points, somewhat dense and often, but not always, relatively superficial. But these faults are almost to be expected in a book as ambitious as this one, given its size. In the end, they do not detract from its value, which is to introduce, discuss and stimulate reflection on and engagement with the vexed contemporary challenge of religious prejudice and hatred.","PeriodicalId":45172,"journal":{"name":"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations","volume":"16 1","pages":"311 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2022.2069363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Content and substance can be highly variable even when parallel dynamics are at play. The final section takes the discussion of prejudice beyond the Western sphere, dealing in Chapter 8 with the phenomenon of Islamic antisemitism and the Palestine–Israel conflict. Although there is a historical trajectory to Muslim antipathy toward Jews and Judaism, modern Islamic or, perhaps more accurately, Islamist antisemitism is more a product of ‘colonial and Nazi influences’ (149) and a legacy of political Islamist ideologues such as Syed Qutb (1906–1966). Hedges concludes that Muslims whose worldview is framed by Islamic antisemitism pose, arguably, ‘today’s greatest threat to Jews globally’ and that this worldview ‘belies more than a millennia [sic] of history in which Jews and Muslims have, in general, lived amicably side by side, often seeing Christians as a threat against them both’ (164). Chapter 9 examines Islamophobia in the Buddhist world, focussing on examples of ultranationalist and ‘fundamentalist’ Buddhism. This chapter includes a useful review of the theme of violence and war in relation to Buddhism and of the history of relations between Islam and Buddhism. It then focuses on two recent cases of Buddhist Islamophobia in action: Sri Lanka and Myanmar. As ever, the situations and contributing factors are complex, but the bottom line is that Muslims and Islam are perceived as a threatening ‘other’, and so become the subjects of threat and prejudicially motivated enmity. In Chapter 10, the focus shifts to the context of Hindu India and hatred stoked against Muslims, courtesy of their radicalized othering by the Hindutva ultra religio-nationalist movement currently dominant in Indian life and politics. The fourth section concludes with an Interlude discussing the possibility of regulating religious hatred. As mentioned above, the book ends with an epilogue that explores the subject of dialogue, civil rights and peacebuilding. This is a kind of antidote to the book’s understandably relentless negativity. Hedges has tackled an important and difficult subject. My only criticisms are that the text is, at points, somewhat dense and often, but not always, relatively superficial. But these faults are almost to be expected in a book as ambitious as this one, given its size. In the end, they do not detract from its value, which is to introduce, discuss and stimulate reflection on and engagement with the vexed contemporary challenge of religious prejudice and hatred.
存在的视界:《穆卡迪马特》中伊本·阿拉伯文的形而上学al-Qayṣarī
内容和实质可以是高度可变的,即使是在并行动态的情况下。最后一部分讨论了西方世界之外的偏见,在第8章中讨论了伊斯兰反犹主义和巴以冲突的现象。尽管穆斯林对犹太人和犹太教的反感有历史的轨迹,但现代伊斯兰教,或者更准确地说,伊斯兰教的反犹主义更多的是“殖民和纳粹影响”的产物(149),也是赛义德·库特布(Syed Qutb, 1906-1966)等伊斯兰教政治思想家的遗产。赫奇斯的结论是,穆斯林的世界观被伊斯兰反犹主义所框框,可以说,“今天对全球犹太人构成了最大的威胁”,这种世界观“掩盖了一千多年的历史(原文如此),在这段历史中,犹太人和穆斯林通常和睦相处,经常把基督徒视为对他们双方的威胁”(164)。第9章考察了佛教世界中的伊斯兰恐惧症,重点是极端民族主义和“原教旨主义”佛教的例子。本章对暴力和战争与佛教的关系以及伊斯兰教和佛教之间的关系史进行了有益的回顾。然后,它关注了最近发生的两个佛教伊斯兰恐惧症的案例:斯里兰卡和缅甸。与以往一样,情况和促成因素是复杂的,但底线是穆斯林和伊斯兰教被视为具有威胁性的“他者”,因此成为威胁和偏见动机敌意的对象。在第10章中,重点转移到印度教印度的背景和对穆斯林的仇恨,由于他们的激进化,印度教极端宗教民族主义运动目前在印度的生活和政治中占主导地位。第四部分以一段讨论调节宗教仇恨的可能性的插曲结束。如上所述,本书以结束语结尾,探讨了对话、公民权利和建设和平的主题。这是对书中可以理解的无情的消极情绪的一种解药。对冲基金处理了一个重要而困难的问题。我唯一的批评是,这本书在某些地方有些密集,而且往往(但不总是)相对肤浅。但考虑到这本书的规模,这些缺点几乎是意料之中的。最后,他们不会减损其价值,即介绍,讨论和激发对宗教偏见和仇恨的当代挑战的反思和参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations (ICMR) provides a forum for the academic exploration and discussion of the religious tradition of Islam, and of relations between Islam and other religions. It is edited by members of the Department of Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. The editors welcome articles on all aspects of Islam, and particularly on: •the religion and culture of Islam, historical and contemporary •Islam and its relations with other faiths and ideologies •Christian-Muslim relations. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations is a refereed, academic journal. It publishes articles, documentation and reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信