Anti-collision Analysis of Pad Drilling and Optimization of Wellbore Trajectory: A Field Case Study

Wisam I. Al-Rubaye, Dhiaa S. Ghanem, A. Saleem, Hayder A. Al-Attabi
{"title":"Anti-collision Analysis of Pad Drilling and Optimization of Wellbore Trajectory: A Field Case Study","authors":"Wisam I. Al-Rubaye, Dhiaa S. Ghanem, A. Saleem, Hayder A. Al-Attabi","doi":"10.52716/jprs.v12i2.654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Errors can occur in the wellbore position according to the fact the survey tools are not completely accurate; therefore, prediction of well path position is imperative for safe and cost-effective drilling operation. The aim of this paper is an analysis of collision avoidance as well as assessment and optimization of wellbore trajectory for minimizing the risk of collision by applying different anti-collision and planning techniques. Thus, anti-collision analysis of pad drilling in the Iraqi oil field has been investigated using Industry Steering Committee for Wellbore Survey Accuracy (ISCWSA) error model to estimate the wellbores position and assess their separation using different techniques available in the industry. Three actual offset wells X1, X2, X3, and one proposed principal X4 well in a drilling pad have been used in the collision avoidance model.  Separation factor, ladder, and travel cylinder plots revealed a high possibility of X4 proposed well colliding with X3 actual offset well. The separation factor of 0.75 and 7.5 m center to center prove that the current design of X4 principal design doesn’t meet the anti-collision standards, accordingly, a design revision must be highly considered. The field operator hasn’t revised the well design due to the lack in the assessment of anti-collision risks, thus, the survey service company has advised the operator to modify the predetermined well trajectory due to major risk of collision with X3 offset well and the well has been sidetracked. After reviewing and optimizing the well trajectory by using slant and optimum align (curve hold curve) planning methods, the anti-collision results have been greatly improved. The results showed that, through adopting an adequate anti-collision risk assessment and the modified well design, problems associated with the execution of the improper well design could be totally eliminated.","PeriodicalId":16710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v12i2.654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Errors can occur in the wellbore position according to the fact the survey tools are not completely accurate; therefore, prediction of well path position is imperative for safe and cost-effective drilling operation. The aim of this paper is an analysis of collision avoidance as well as assessment and optimization of wellbore trajectory for minimizing the risk of collision by applying different anti-collision and planning techniques. Thus, anti-collision analysis of pad drilling in the Iraqi oil field has been investigated using Industry Steering Committee for Wellbore Survey Accuracy (ISCWSA) error model to estimate the wellbores position and assess their separation using different techniques available in the industry. Three actual offset wells X1, X2, X3, and one proposed principal X4 well in a drilling pad have been used in the collision avoidance model.  Separation factor, ladder, and travel cylinder plots revealed a high possibility of X4 proposed well colliding with X3 actual offset well. The separation factor of 0.75 and 7.5 m center to center prove that the current design of X4 principal design doesn’t meet the anti-collision standards, accordingly, a design revision must be highly considered. The field operator hasn’t revised the well design due to the lack in the assessment of anti-collision risks, thus, the survey service company has advised the operator to modify the predetermined well trajectory due to major risk of collision with X3 offset well and the well has been sidetracked. After reviewing and optimizing the well trajectory by using slant and optimum align (curve hold curve) planning methods, the anti-collision results have been greatly improved. The results showed that, through adopting an adequate anti-collision risk assessment and the modified well design, problems associated with the execution of the improper well design could be totally eliminated.
垫块钻井防碰撞分析及井眼轨迹优化:现场实例研究
由于测量工具不完全准确,可能会在井筒位置产生误差;因此,对井眼轨迹位置的预测对于保证钻井作业的安全性和经济效益至关重要。本文的目的是通过应用不同的防碰撞和规划技术来分析避免碰撞以及评估和优化井眼轨迹,以最大限度地降低碰撞风险。因此,利用行业井眼测量精度指导委员会(ISCWSA)误差模型对伊拉克油田垫块钻井的防碰撞分析进行了研究,利用行业中可用的不同技术来估计井眼位置并评估它们的分离程度。在避碰模型中使用了一个钻井平台上的3口实际邻井X1、X2、X3和1口拟议的主井X4。分离因子图、阶梯图和行程柱图显示,X4拟井与X3实际邻井发生碰撞的可能性很大。0.75和7.5 m的中心间距系数证明X4主设计目前的设计不符合防撞标准,因此必须高度考虑设计修改。由于缺乏防撞风险评估,现场作业者没有修改井设计,因此,由于X3邻井存在重大碰撞风险,因此调查服务公司建议作业者修改预定井眼轨迹,该井已被侧钻。采用斜井和最优对(曲线保持曲线)规划方法对井眼轨迹进行了回顾和优化,大大提高了防撞效果。结果表明,通过采取适当的防碰撞风险评估和改进的井设计,可以完全消除与不当井设计执行相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信