Multidimensional perfectionism turns 30: A review of known knowns and known unknowns.

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Martin M. Smith, S. Sherry, Sabrina Ge, P. Hewitt, G. Flett, Dayna L. Baggley
{"title":"Multidimensional perfectionism turns 30: A review of known knowns and known unknowns.","authors":"Martin M. Smith, S. Sherry, Sabrina Ge, P. Hewitt, G. Flett, Dayna L. Baggley","doi":"10.1037/CAP0000288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theory and evidence converge to suggest perfectionism is a personality construct that matters a great deal and is linked with many consequential outcomes (e.g., depression, eating disorders, suicide, marital problems, and procrastination). With the multidimensional perfectionism construct turning 30 years of age, our review critically examines the past and the future of this construct with a focus on the six landmark dimensions of Hewitt and Flett’s (1991) and Frost et al.’s (1990) seminal models: Self-oriented perfectionism, other-oriented perfectionism, socially prescribed perfectionism, personal standards, concerns over mistakes, and doubts about actions. Our review considers both what we understand about these dimensions given the extant empirical literature (i.e., known knowns) and areas where gaps exist in our understanding of multidimensional perfectionism and its consequences (i.e., known unknowns). Evidence suggests the core dimensions of Hewitt and Flett’s (1991) and Frost et al.’s (1990) trait and attitudinal models of perfectionism, respectively, are neither captured by nor redundant with other well-established predictors. In fact, these perfectionism dimensions appear to represent core vulnerability factors that are tied intimately to the development and maintenance of a wide range of maladaptive outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47883,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/CAP0000288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Theory and evidence converge to suggest perfectionism is a personality construct that matters a great deal and is linked with many consequential outcomes (e.g., depression, eating disorders, suicide, marital problems, and procrastination). With the multidimensional perfectionism construct turning 30 years of age, our review critically examines the past and the future of this construct with a focus on the six landmark dimensions of Hewitt and Flett’s (1991) and Frost et al.’s (1990) seminal models: Self-oriented perfectionism, other-oriented perfectionism, socially prescribed perfectionism, personal standards, concerns over mistakes, and doubts about actions. Our review considers both what we understand about these dimensions given the extant empirical literature (i.e., known knowns) and areas where gaps exist in our understanding of multidimensional perfectionism and its consequences (i.e., known unknowns). Evidence suggests the core dimensions of Hewitt and Flett’s (1991) and Frost et al.’s (1990) trait and attitudinal models of perfectionism, respectively, are neither captured by nor redundant with other well-established predictors. In fact, these perfectionism dimensions appear to represent core vulnerability factors that are tied intimately to the development and maintenance of a wide range of maladaptive outcomes.
多维完美主义30岁:对已知已知和已知未知的回顾。
理论和证据一致表明,完美主义是一种非常重要的人格结构,与许多后果有关(例如,抑郁、饮食失调、自杀、婚姻问题和拖延症)。随着多维完美主义结构30岁的到来,我们的回顾批判性地审视了这一结构的过去和未来,重点关注Hewitt和Flett(1991)和Frost等人(1990)开创性模型的六个里程碑维度:自我导向的完美主义,他人导向的完美主义,社会规定的完美主义,个人标准,对错误的关注和对行为的怀疑。我们的回顾考虑了我们对现有经验文献(即已知的已知)和我们对多维完美主义及其后果的理解存在差距的领域(即已知的未知)的这些维度的理解。有证据表明,Hewitt和Flett(1991)以及Frost等人(1990)的完美主义特质模型和态度模型的核心维度,既没有被其他成熟的预测因子捕获,也没有冗余。事实上,这些完美主义维度似乎代表了核心脆弱性因素,这些因素与各种适应不良结果的发展和维持密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne
Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Canadian Psychology has a mandate to present generalist articles in areas of theory, research, and practice that are potentially of interest to a broad cross-section of psychologists. Manuscripts with direct relevance to the context of Canadian psychology are also appropriate for submission. Original, empirical contributions are not within the mandate of the journal, unless the research is of direct relevance to the discipline as a whole (e.g., a survey of psychologists about the future of the discipline).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信