Repaying an Unlawfully Paid Dividend

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Nicholas A. Grier
{"title":"Repaying an Unlawfully Paid Dividend","authors":"Nicholas A. Grier","doi":"10.54648/bula2023017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well settled that directors are jointly and severally liable for an unlawfully paid dividend, being one that is not paid out of distributable profits. Strict rules apply to the meaning of distributable profits and the authorization of the payment of a dividend. What is not so clear is when a member may retain an unlawfully paid dividend. Section 847 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) indicates that a member must repay it if he knows that it is unlawfully paid, though it is not clear what constitutes ‘knowing’ in this content, or what the position should be if a member does not immediately know if the payment is unlawful, but subsequently discovers that it is. Case law is not especially helpful in dealing with this point. It is suggested that a solution to this gap in the law may be found in the precise wording of section 847, and that a member’s liability to repay should be limited to a period of six months after payment (similar to an unfair preference).\nDirectors, Liability, Shareholders, Dividends, Unlawful distribution","PeriodicalId":42005,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS LAW REVIEW","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS LAW REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bula2023017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well settled that directors are jointly and severally liable for an unlawfully paid dividend, being one that is not paid out of distributable profits. Strict rules apply to the meaning of distributable profits and the authorization of the payment of a dividend. What is not so clear is when a member may retain an unlawfully paid dividend. Section 847 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) indicates that a member must repay it if he knows that it is unlawfully paid, though it is not clear what constitutes ‘knowing’ in this content, or what the position should be if a member does not immediately know if the payment is unlawful, but subsequently discovers that it is. Case law is not especially helpful in dealing with this point. It is suggested that a solution to this gap in the law may be found in the precise wording of section 847, and that a member’s liability to repay should be limited to a period of six months after payment (similar to an unfair preference). Directors, Liability, Shareholders, Dividends, Unlawful distribution
偿还非法支付的股息
众所周知,董事对非法支付的股息负有共同和连带责任,即不是从可分配利润中支付的股息。可分配利润的含义和支付股息的授权都有严格的规定。但不太清楚的是,股东何时可以保留非法支付的股息。《2006年公司法》(CA 2006)第847条指出,如果成员知道这笔钱是非法支付的,他必须偿还这笔钱,尽管在这一内容中不清楚什么是“知道”,也不清楚如果成员不立即知道这笔钱是否非法,但后来发现它是非法的,该怎么办。判例法在处理这一点上并不是特别有用。有人建议,可以在第847条的精确措辞中找到解决法律上这一差距的办法,并且成员的偿还责任应限于付款后的六个月期间(类似于不公平的偏好)。董事,责任,股东,股息,非法分配
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信