{"title":"Kinship Novels of Early Modern Korea: Between Genealogical Time and the Domestic Everyday by Ksenia Chizhova (review)","authors":"Francisco Gómez Martos","doi":"10.1353/pan.2023.a899750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ded in other things and systems. All existing sociocultural, political, and (post) colonial contexts attest to the centrality of interconnectedness even when the systems exclude and oppress. We undoubtedly need classification, boundaries, and solidarities to function as a society, but not in the ways in which these are carried out in colonial contexts through violence, erasure, and forgetting. One problem with the book, perhaps inherent in the nature of the questions it asks, is that it refers to texts and theoretical concepts either written by European authors or in European languages. For instance, chapter 3 discusses India, using Forster’s novel, as if India had no history prior to colonial rule. Indeed, the author attempts to underscore the limits but also the potentialities of the colonial encounter, but doing so obscures India and its history. Despite this challenge, which is typical of projects engaging with colonialism, Modernism after Postcolonialism develops tools to comprehend the current “unequal” systems, and though such efforts may be thwarted, given creativity and imagination, existing systems can be challenged and transformed, and anxieties replaced by harmony.","PeriodicalId":42435,"journal":{"name":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","volume":"158 1","pages":"374 - 377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2023.a899750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ded in other things and systems. All existing sociocultural, political, and (post) colonial contexts attest to the centrality of interconnectedness even when the systems exclude and oppress. We undoubtedly need classification, boundaries, and solidarities to function as a society, but not in the ways in which these are carried out in colonial contexts through violence, erasure, and forgetting. One problem with the book, perhaps inherent in the nature of the questions it asks, is that it refers to texts and theoretical concepts either written by European authors or in European languages. For instance, chapter 3 discusses India, using Forster’s novel, as if India had no history prior to colonial rule. Indeed, the author attempts to underscore the limits but also the potentialities of the colonial encounter, but doing so obscures India and its history. Despite this challenge, which is typical of projects engaging with colonialism, Modernism after Postcolonialism develops tools to comprehend the current “unequal” systems, and though such efforts may be thwarted, given creativity and imagination, existing systems can be challenged and transformed, and anxieties replaced by harmony.
期刊介绍:
Partial Answers is an international, peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the study of literature and the history of ideas. This interdisciplinary component is responsible for combining analysis of literary works with discussions of historical and theoretical issues. The journal publishes articles on various national literatures including Anglophone, Hebrew, Yiddish, German, Russian, and, predominately, English literature. Partial Answers would appeal to literature scholars, teachers, and students in addition to scholars in philosophy, cultural studies, and intellectual history.