CROSS-RESISTANCE OF AZOLES, ECHINOCANDINS, FLUCYTOSINE AND AMPHOTERICIN B IN CLINICALLY IMPORTANT HYPHOMYCETES

A. Schmalreck, W. Fegeler, K. Becker, C. Lass‐Flörl, Czaika
{"title":"CROSS-RESISTANCE OF AZOLES, ECHINOCANDINS, FLUCYTOSINE AND AMPHOTERICIN B IN CLINICALLY IMPORTANT HYPHOMYCETES","authors":"A. Schmalreck, W. Fegeler, K. Becker, C. Lass‐Flörl, Czaika","doi":"10.9735/0975-5276.6.1.519-544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing standardized micro-broth dilution methods for in vitro testing of moulds (CLSI, EUCAST) are referred to as reference methods and therefore not intended for routine testing. They are time-consuming and dependent on sporulating hyphomycetes. In this study a new, time saving and easy-to-perform method for inoculum preparation for routine susceptibility testing has been applied. It is independent of spore production and proofed to produce comparable results to the conidia based methods, indicating that it can be used for all types of hyphae-and/or conidia-forming fungi. The MICs of amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin of 198 moulds were determined with two different culture media (YST and RPMI 1640) according to the DIN microdilution assay, and compared to appropri- ate international studies. The \"new\" inocula with YST (DIN) and RPMI 1640 (EUCAST) medium showed similar MIC distributions for all moulds tested to the conidia method, with more than 92% of the MICs read at 24 h and 48 h within ± 1log2-dilution. Although azoles, flucyto- sine and amphotericin B showed comparable results, differences in echinocandin endpoints between different multicentre studies were de- termined. According to the literature, the minimum effective concentration (MEC) should be equivalent to the minimum inhibitory concentra- tion (MIC). However, due to the encountered bias in echinocandin-endpoint determinations this has to be questioned. Evaluation of cross- resistance demonstrated that no individual strain out of 198 was in parallel susceptible to all eight antifungal agents tested. Cross-resistance between azoles, echinocandins, amphotericin B, and flucytosine could be detected quantitatively with a new method for fungi. It ranges from two to sevenfold, and demonstrates quantitatively different and species-specific susceptibility/resistance patterns.","PeriodicalId":92914,"journal":{"name":"International journal of microbiology and current research","volume":"51 1","pages":"519-544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of microbiology and current research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9735/0975-5276.6.1.519-544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The existing standardized micro-broth dilution methods for in vitro testing of moulds (CLSI, EUCAST) are referred to as reference methods and therefore not intended for routine testing. They are time-consuming and dependent on sporulating hyphomycetes. In this study a new, time saving and easy-to-perform method for inoculum preparation for routine susceptibility testing has been applied. It is independent of spore production and proofed to produce comparable results to the conidia based methods, indicating that it can be used for all types of hyphae-and/or conidia-forming fungi. The MICs of amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin of 198 moulds were determined with two different culture media (YST and RPMI 1640) according to the DIN microdilution assay, and compared to appropri- ate international studies. The "new" inocula with YST (DIN) and RPMI 1640 (EUCAST) medium showed similar MIC distributions for all moulds tested to the conidia method, with more than 92% of the MICs read at 24 h and 48 h within ± 1log2-dilution. Although azoles, flucyto- sine and amphotericin B showed comparable results, differences in echinocandin endpoints between different multicentre studies were de- termined. According to the literature, the minimum effective concentration (MEC) should be equivalent to the minimum inhibitory concentra- tion (MIC). However, due to the encountered bias in echinocandin-endpoint determinations this has to be questioned. Evaluation of cross- resistance demonstrated that no individual strain out of 198 was in parallel susceptible to all eight antifungal agents tested. Cross-resistance between azoles, echinocandins, amphotericin B, and flucytosine could be detected quantitatively with a new method for fungi. It ranges from two to sevenfold, and demonstrates quantitatively different and species-specific susceptibility/resistance patterns.
唑类、棘白菌素、氟胞嘧啶和两性霉素b在临床重要菌丝菌中的交叉耐药
现有用于霉菌体外检测的标准化微肉汤稀释法(CLSI, EUCAST)被称为参考方法,因此不用于常规检测。它们耗时且依赖于产孢的丝孢菌。本研究提出了一种简便、省时的常规药敏试验接种准备方法。它独立于孢子的产生,并被证明可以产生与基于分生孢子的方法相当的结果,这表明它可以用于所有类型的菌丝和/或分生孢子形成真菌。采用DIN微量稀释法测定198种霉菌中两性霉素B、氟胞嘧啶、氟康唑、泊沙康唑、伏立康唑、阿尼杜拉芬金、卡泊芬金和米卡芬金的mic,并与国际相关研究进行比较。使用YST (DIN)和RPMI 1640 (EUCAST)培养基的“新”接种剂在分生孢子法测试的所有霉菌中显示出相似的MIC分布,在±1log2稀释条件下,24 h和48 h的MIC读数超过92%。虽然唑类、氟胞嘧啶类和两性霉素B的结果具有可比性,但不同的多中心研究确定了刺青素终点的差异。根据文献,最低有效浓度(MEC)应等同于最低抑制浓度(MIC)。然而,由于在棘白菌素终点测定中遇到偏倚,这必须受到质疑。交叉抗性评价表明,198株菌株中没有一株对所有8种抗真菌药物平行敏感。该方法可定量检测真菌中唑类、棘白菌素、两性霉素B和氟胞嘧啶的交叉耐药性。它的范围从2倍到7倍不等,并显示出数量上的不同和物种特异性的敏感性/抗性模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信