Evaluation of RAP Engineering Characteristics in Layered Soil

Q3 Engineering
M. J. Al-Waily, M. S. Al-Qaisi
{"title":"Evaluation of RAP Engineering Characteristics in Layered Soil","authors":"M. J. Al-Waily, M. S. Al-Qaisi","doi":"10.22075/JRCE.2021.24176.1536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current investigation used 16 model tests with two alternative foundation shapes, one strip and the other square, for a total of eight model tests for each foundation type. A model test was conducted only on natural soils to evaluate the two types of foundation and both circumstances of improvement utilizing RAP. The model square footing was laid on a layer of (RAP), with the varied widths (1.25B and 1.75B) and different thicknesses (0.25 B, 0.50 B, and 0.75 B in which B=footing width). Six model tests are tested in two widths (1.25B and 2.50B) in model strip footing treated (RAP), and three thicknesses (0.50B, 1B, and 1.5B) in each width are done. ‎The settlement improvement factor was utilized to show the (RAP) layer's influence.The data suggested that the (RAP) layer beneath the foundations influenced settlement significantly.‎ The RAP material in a square footing with a depth of 0.75 B offered the most efficient settlement reduction, with the lowest settlement improvement factor of all model tests. ‎ A model test was run with a RAP width of B and a depth of 0.25 B. It was discovered that RAP soil treatment reduced settlement by 0.34, implying that treated soil settled by 34% less than untreated soil.","PeriodicalId":52415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2021.24176.1536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The current investigation used 16 model tests with two alternative foundation shapes, one strip and the other square, for a total of eight model tests for each foundation type. A model test was conducted only on natural soils to evaluate the two types of foundation and both circumstances of improvement utilizing RAP. The model square footing was laid on a layer of (RAP), with the varied widths (1.25B and 1.75B) and different thicknesses (0.25 B, 0.50 B, and 0.75 B in which B=footing width). Six model tests are tested in two widths (1.25B and 2.50B) in model strip footing treated (RAP), and three thicknesses (0.50B, 1B, and 1.5B) in each width are done. ‎The settlement improvement factor was utilized to show the (RAP) layer's influence.The data suggested that the (RAP) layer beneath the foundations influenced settlement significantly.‎ The RAP material in a square footing with a depth of 0.75 B offered the most efficient settlement reduction, with the lowest settlement improvement factor of all model tests. ‎ A model test was run with a RAP width of B and a depth of 0.25 B. It was discovered that RAP soil treatment reduced settlement by 0.34, implying that treated soil settled by 34% less than untreated soil.
层状土RAP工程特性评价
目前的调查使用了16个模型试验,有两种可供选择的基础形状,一种是条形,另一种是方形,每种基础类型总共进行了8个模型试验。仅在天然土上进行了模型试验,以评估两种地基类型和RAP改善的两种情况。模型方基础铺设在一层(RAP)上,该层具有不同的宽度(1.25B和1.75B)和不同的厚度(0.25 B, 0.50 B和0.75 B,其中B=基础宽度)。在模型条形基础处理(RAP)中,以两种宽度(1.25B和2.50B)进行了六次模型试验,并在每种宽度中进行了三种厚度(0.50B, 1B和1.5B)。采用沉降改善因子表示(RAP)层的影响。结果表明,地基下RAP层对沉降影响较大。在深度为0.75 B的方形地基中,RAP材料提供了最有效的沉降减少,在所有模型测试中具有最低的沉降改善系数。采用RAP宽度为B,深度为0.25 B的模型试验发现,RAP土壤处理减少了0.34的沉降,这意味着处理过的土壤比未处理过的土壤沉降少34%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信