Prevalence of Non-Thromboembolic Incidental Findings on Computed Tomography-Pulmonary Angiography for Pulmonary

R. Bozorgmehr, Mehdi Pishgahi, P. Mohaghegh, M. Bayat, Parastou Khodadadi, Ahmadreza Ghafori
{"title":"Prevalence of Non-Thromboembolic Incidental Findings on Computed Tomography-Pulmonary Angiography for Pulmonary","authors":"R. Bozorgmehr, Mehdi Pishgahi, P. Mohaghegh, M. Bayat, Parastou Khodadadi, Ahmadreza Ghafori","doi":"10.29252/26716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Computed Tomography-Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) is a noninvasive imaging modality for direct diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism. The potential advantage of CTPA is possible alternative and incidental findings in cases that PTE is ruled out. This study was performed to determine the prevalence of incidental findings in CTPA in patients suspected to have PTE. Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective study was performed in patients with suspected PTE admitted to Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital in 2014 and 2015 and underwent CTPA for final diagnosis. Incidental findings in CTPA and associated clinical symptoms were assessed. Results: According to CTPA performed in 188 patients, PTE was diagnosed in 61 cases (32.4%). Prevalence of incidental abnormal findings in the two groups with and without PTE were 93.7% and 90.9%, respectively. The most common incidental finding was pleural effusion (42%). There was no significant association between clinical symptoms and incidental findings in CTPA in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (P > 0.05). The only significant finding was association between lung mass and tachypnea (P=0.007). Conclusion: In patients with primary clinical symptoms of suspected pulmonary embolism, in most cases there was a wide range of incidental findings and simultaneous pathologies in CTPA mimicking the primary symptoms of pulmonary embolism. However, in this study there was no significant association between clinical symptoms and incidental findings. Determination of definite indications of CTPA in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism is necessary.","PeriodicalId":31436,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Practice","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/26716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Computed Tomography-Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) is a noninvasive imaging modality for direct diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism. The potential advantage of CTPA is possible alternative and incidental findings in cases that PTE is ruled out. This study was performed to determine the prevalence of incidental findings in CTPA in patients suspected to have PTE. Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective study was performed in patients with suspected PTE admitted to Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital in 2014 and 2015 and underwent CTPA for final diagnosis. Incidental findings in CTPA and associated clinical symptoms were assessed. Results: According to CTPA performed in 188 patients, PTE was diagnosed in 61 cases (32.4%). Prevalence of incidental abnormal findings in the two groups with and without PTE were 93.7% and 90.9%, respectively. The most common incidental finding was pleural effusion (42%). There was no significant association between clinical symptoms and incidental findings in CTPA in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (P > 0.05). The only significant finding was association between lung mass and tachypnea (P=0.007). Conclusion: In patients with primary clinical symptoms of suspected pulmonary embolism, in most cases there was a wide range of incidental findings and simultaneous pathologies in CTPA mimicking the primary symptoms of pulmonary embolism. However, in this study there was no significant association between clinical symptoms and incidental findings. Determination of definite indications of CTPA in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism is necessary.
肺部ct -肺血管造影非血栓栓塞性意外发现的发生率
计算机断层扫描-肺血管造影(CTPA)是一种直接诊断肺血栓栓塞的无创成像方式。在排除PTE的病例中,CTPA的潜在优势是可能的替代和偶然发现。本研究旨在确定疑似PTE患者CTPA附带发现的发生率。方法:本研究对2014年和2015年在Shohada-e-Tajrish医院就诊的疑似PTE患者进行横断面回顾性研究,并对其进行CTPA最终诊断。评估CTPA的偶然发现和相关临床症状。结果:188例患者行CTPA检查,确诊PTE 61例(32.4%)。有PTE组和无PTE组的偶发异常发生率分别为93.7%和90.9%。最常见的意外发现是胸腔积液(42%)。疑似肺栓塞患者CTPA的临床症状与偶发症状无显著相关性(P > 0.05)。唯一有意义的发现是肺质量与呼吸急促之间的关联(P=0.007)。结论:以疑似肺栓塞为主要临床症状的患者,在大多数情况下,CTPA有广泛的偶发表现和同时出现的病理模拟肺栓塞的主要症状。然而,在这项研究中,临床症状和偶然发现之间没有显著的关联。在疑似肺栓塞的患者中,确定CTPA的确切适应症是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信