A Machine Learning Approach to Shear Sonic Log Prediction

I. Bukar, M. B. Adamu, U. Hassan
{"title":"A Machine Learning Approach to Shear Sonic Log Prediction","authors":"I. Bukar, M. B. Adamu, U. Hassan","doi":"10.2118/198764-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A machine learning approach to shear sonic log prediction is demonstrated. The results of this approach were compared to that of an approach based on the Greenberg-Castagna empirical method. This approach is based on supervised machine learning and is implemented in MATLAB. While the Greenberg-Castagna method is an empirical method that attempts to predict shear velocity log from compressional velocity log for various pure and composite lithologies, this approach uses, in addition to compressional velocity log as the main predictor, several other logging measurements as predictors including gamma ray, bulk density, neutron, resistivity, porosity and water saturation logs. A dataset which includes wells with recorded shear velocity logs is used to train and validate the machine learning model. A feature selection process is performed to highlight which of the logs would be good predictors of shear velocity (VS). Various regression models are then trained, and the predicted values compared to the actual for the various models by their root-mean-square errors (RMSE), and the model with the smallest RMSE is chosen. Predictions are then carried out on another well within the dataset, which serves as the validation set. The results show improvement in the accuracy of the predictions over the linear regression model based on the Greenberg-Castagna method, as measured by the RMSE. The case study also demonstrates the potential of carrying out shear sonic log prediction in hydrocarbon-bearing intervals, which is a limitation of the Greenberg-Castagna method which only works in brine-saturated rocks. This approach would provide improved accuracy where shear sonic logs are absent and need to be predicted for geomechanics, rock physics and other applications. This is particularly important in older fields where shear sonic logs were never acquired in the older wells.","PeriodicalId":11110,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198764-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

A machine learning approach to shear sonic log prediction is demonstrated. The results of this approach were compared to that of an approach based on the Greenberg-Castagna empirical method. This approach is based on supervised machine learning and is implemented in MATLAB. While the Greenberg-Castagna method is an empirical method that attempts to predict shear velocity log from compressional velocity log for various pure and composite lithologies, this approach uses, in addition to compressional velocity log as the main predictor, several other logging measurements as predictors including gamma ray, bulk density, neutron, resistivity, porosity and water saturation logs. A dataset which includes wells with recorded shear velocity logs is used to train and validate the machine learning model. A feature selection process is performed to highlight which of the logs would be good predictors of shear velocity (VS). Various regression models are then trained, and the predicted values compared to the actual for the various models by their root-mean-square errors (RMSE), and the model with the smallest RMSE is chosen. Predictions are then carried out on another well within the dataset, which serves as the validation set. The results show improvement in the accuracy of the predictions over the linear regression model based on the Greenberg-Castagna method, as measured by the RMSE. The case study also demonstrates the potential of carrying out shear sonic log prediction in hydrocarbon-bearing intervals, which is a limitation of the Greenberg-Castagna method which only works in brine-saturated rocks. This approach would provide improved accuracy where shear sonic logs are absent and need to be predicted for geomechanics, rock physics and other applications. This is particularly important in older fields where shear sonic logs were never acquired in the older wells.
剪切声波测井预测的机器学习方法
介绍了一种用于剪切声波测井预测的机器学习方法。将该方法的结果与基于Greenberg-Castagna经验方法的结果进行了比较。该方法基于监督机器学习,并在MATLAB中实现。虽然Greenberg-Castagna方法是一种经验方法,试图通过压缩速度测井预测各种纯岩性和复合岩性的剪切速度测井,但该方法除了使用压缩速度测井作为主要预测指标外,还使用其他几种测井测量作为预测指标,包括伽马射线、体积密度、中子、电阻率、孔隙度和含水饱和度测井。数据集包括记录剪切速度测井的井,用于训练和验证机器学习模型。进行特征选择过程,以突出哪些日志可以很好地预测剪切速度(VS)。然后对各种回归模型进行训练,并将各种模型的预测值与实际值进行均方根误差(RMSE)的比较,选择RMSE最小的模型。然后在数据集中的另一个井上进行预测,该井作为验证集。结果表明,通过RMSE测量,基于Greenberg-Castagna方法的线性回归模型的预测精度有所提高。该案例还证明了在含油气层段进行剪切声波测井预测的潜力,这是Greenberg-Castagna方法的局限性,该方法仅适用于含盐岩石。在地质力学、岩石物理学和其他应用中,这种方法可以提高剪切声波测井的准确性,并且需要进行预测。这在老油田尤其重要,因为老油井从未采集过剪切声波测井数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信