Diagnostic Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients with Small Myocardial Perfusion Defects with Low Exercise Tolerance

Ehab A. El-Sayed, Ahmed K Metawa, M. Mokarrab, I. Shawky, M. A. Mousa, Mohammed E Saif
{"title":"Diagnostic Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients with Small Myocardial Perfusion Defects with Low Exercise Tolerance","authors":"Ehab A. El-Sayed, Ahmed K Metawa, M. Mokarrab, I. Shawky, M. A. Mousa, Mohammed E Saif","doi":"10.4172/2155-9880.1000564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The diagnostic and prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy is well established in literature. The sensitivity and specificity of the test depends on multiple factors. The workload achieved during treadmill exercise is one of the most important determinants. Hence, we thought to assess the coronary anatomy in a group of patients with low exercise tolerance that showed small perfusion defects on stress MPI studies. \nMaterial and methods: We prospectively enrolled 50 patients with mild perfusion defects and a poor exercise tolerance. An invasive coronary angiography was done according to the clinical decision of the treating physician. All patients were subjected to full history and clinical examination. Stress SPECT Tc99m Sestamibi scintigraphy was done on basis of a 2 day stress/rest imaging protocol (Exercise duration, age predicted maximal heart rate (APMHR %), ejection fraction (EF%), transient ischemic dilatation and duke treadmill score(DTS)) were recorded. A coronary stenosis ≥ 75% was considered significant. In the current study, APMHR 0.05 is considered significant. \nResults: Among the study cohort, a total of 6 patients (12%) had significant CAD. In presence of a small perfusion defect in the setting of low exercise tolerance, significant CAD was observed more frequently in patients with exercise duration ≤ 7 min, APMHR <85%, transient stress induced LV cavity dilatation and moderate/high DTS. The six patients with significant angiographic lesions demonstrated single vessel disease in the whole group. Distribution of the angiographic lesions was as follows: RCA (4 patients) 66.7%, the LAD (one patient) 16.65%, and the LCX (one patient) 16.65%. \nConclusion: In the setting of low exercise tolerance, negative MPI/small sized perfusion defect may not exclude significant CAD. Several clinical, stress, and SPECT-MPI findings may help to predict high risk patients. Consideration of these factors may improve the overall assessment of the likelihood of significant CAD in patients undergoing stress SPECT- MPI.","PeriodicalId":15504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The diagnostic and prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy is well established in literature. The sensitivity and specificity of the test depends on multiple factors. The workload achieved during treadmill exercise is one of the most important determinants. Hence, we thought to assess the coronary anatomy in a group of patients with low exercise tolerance that showed small perfusion defects on stress MPI studies. Material and methods: We prospectively enrolled 50 patients with mild perfusion defects and a poor exercise tolerance. An invasive coronary angiography was done according to the clinical decision of the treating physician. All patients were subjected to full history and clinical examination. Stress SPECT Tc99m Sestamibi scintigraphy was done on basis of a 2 day stress/rest imaging protocol (Exercise duration, age predicted maximal heart rate (APMHR %), ejection fraction (EF%), transient ischemic dilatation and duke treadmill score(DTS)) were recorded. A coronary stenosis ≥ 75% was considered significant. In the current study, APMHR 0.05 is considered significant. Results: Among the study cohort, a total of 6 patients (12%) had significant CAD. In presence of a small perfusion defect in the setting of low exercise tolerance, significant CAD was observed more frequently in patients with exercise duration ≤ 7 min, APMHR <85%, transient stress induced LV cavity dilatation and moderate/high DTS. The six patients with significant angiographic lesions demonstrated single vessel disease in the whole group. Distribution of the angiographic lesions was as follows: RCA (4 patients) 66.7%, the LAD (one patient) 16.65%, and the LCX (one patient) 16.65%. Conclusion: In the setting of low exercise tolerance, negative MPI/small sized perfusion defect may not exclude significant CAD. Several clinical, stress, and SPECT-MPI findings may help to predict high risk patients. Consideration of these factors may improve the overall assessment of the likelihood of significant CAD in patients undergoing stress SPECT- MPI.
有创冠状动脉造影在小心肌灌注缺陷低运动耐量患者中的诊断价值
背景:应激心肌灌注显像的诊断和预后价值已得到文献证实。该试验的敏感性和特异性取决于多种因素。在跑步机运动中获得的工作量是最重要的决定因素之一。因此,我们认为评估一组低运动耐受性患者的冠状动脉解剖,这些患者在应激性MPI研究中显示出小的灌注缺陷。材料和方法:我们前瞻性地招募了50例轻度灌注缺陷和运动耐受性差的患者。根据主治医师的临床决定,行有创冠状动脉造影。所有患者均接受了完整的病史和临床检查。在2天应激/休息成像方案的基础上进行应激SPECT Tc99m Sestamibi闪烁成像(记录运动时间、年龄预测最大心率(APMHR %)、射血分数(EF%)、短暂性脑缺血扩张和杜克跑步机评分(DTS))。冠状动脉狭窄≥75%。本研究认为APMHR 0.05具有显著性。结果:在研究队列中,共有6例(12%)患者有明显的CAD。在低运动耐量条件下存在小灌注缺陷的情况下,运动时间≤7 min、APMHR <85%、短暂性应激性左室腔扩张和中高DTS的患者更常观察到明显的CAD。有明显血管造影病变的6例患者在整个组中表现为单一血管病变。血管造影病变分布如下:RCA(4例)66.7%,LAD(1例)16.65%,LCX(1例)16.65%。结论:在低运动耐量的情况下,MPI阴性/小灌注缺陷可能不排除明显的CAD。一些临床、压力和SPECT-MPI的发现可能有助于预测高危患者。考虑这些因素可以提高对接受应激SPECT- MPI的患者发生显著CAD可能性的总体评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信