COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED MODIFIED PECTORAL NERVE BLOCK WITH LOCAL ANAESTHESTIC INFILTRATION FOR ANALGESIA IN BREAST CANCER SURGERY

PAFMJ Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.4110
Usman Saqib, Rashid Iqbal, S. Usman, R. Hanif
{"title":"COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED MODIFIED PECTORAL NERVE BLOCK WITH LOCAL ANAESTHESTIC INFILTRATION FOR ANALGESIA IN BREAST CANCER SURGERY","authors":"Usman Saqib, Rashid Iqbal, S. Usman, R. Hanif","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.4110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the frequency of pain and mean analgesia requirement after breast surgery under general anaesthesia when comparing pectoral nerve block with local anaesthesia infiltration. \nStudy Design: Comparative prospective study. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi from Mar 2018 to Sep 2019. \nMethodology: A total of 60 patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were included in the study. Group A (n=30) received pectoral nerve blocks while Group B (n=30) received local anaesthetic infiltration. Outcome was assessed at 12 hours after injection of local anaesthetic. \nResults: Pain in 7 (23.33%) patients in Group A (Pectoral nerve blocks) and in 20 (66.67%) patients in Group B (Local anaesthetic infiltration), p-value of 0.001 which was considered statistically significant. Mean analgesic requirement was found to be 80 ± 33.73 mg in the Group A (pectoral nerve blocks) compared with 141.67 ± 47.50 mg in Group B (Local anaesthesia infiltration) patients with a p-value of <0.001 which was statistically significant. \nConclusion: Pectoral nerve block significantly reduces early postoperative pain and analgesia requirement when compared with Local anaesthesia infiltration after breast surgery.","PeriodicalId":19982,"journal":{"name":"PAFMJ","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAFMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.4110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the frequency of pain and mean analgesia requirement after breast surgery under general anaesthesia when comparing pectoral nerve block with local anaesthesia infiltration. Study Design: Comparative prospective study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi from Mar 2018 to Sep 2019. Methodology: A total of 60 patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were included in the study. Group A (n=30) received pectoral nerve blocks while Group B (n=30) received local anaesthetic infiltration. Outcome was assessed at 12 hours after injection of local anaesthetic. Results: Pain in 7 (23.33%) patients in Group A (Pectoral nerve blocks) and in 20 (66.67%) patients in Group B (Local anaesthetic infiltration), p-value of 0.001 which was considered statistically significant. Mean analgesic requirement was found to be 80 ± 33.73 mg in the Group A (pectoral nerve blocks) compared with 141.67 ± 47.50 mg in Group B (Local anaesthesia infiltration) patients with a p-value of <0.001 which was statistically significant. Conclusion: Pectoral nerve block significantly reduces early postoperative pain and analgesia requirement when compared with Local anaesthesia infiltration after breast surgery.
超声引导改良胸神经阻滞与局麻浸润在乳腺癌手术镇痛中的比较
目的:比较胸神经阻滞与局麻浸润在全麻下乳房手术后疼痛频次及平均镇痛需求。研究设计:比较前瞻性研究。学习地点和时间:2018年3月至2019年9月在拉瓦尔品第军队联合医院学习。方法:本研究共纳入60例接受改良乳房根治术的患者。A组(n=30)行胸神经阻滞,B组(n=30)行局麻浸润。在注射局麻后12小时评估结果。结果:A组胸神经阻滞组疼痛7例(23.33%),B组局部麻醉浸润组疼痛20例(66.67%),p值为0.001,具有统计学意义。A组(胸神经阻滞)患者平均镇痛需要量为80±33.73 mg, B组(局麻浸润)患者平均镇痛需要量为141.67±47.50 mg, p值<0.001,差异有统计学意义。结论:胸神经阻滞与乳房术后局麻浸润相比,可明显减少术后早期疼痛和镇痛需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信