Practice-led Research in the Art Museum

Line Engen
{"title":"Practice-led Research in the Art Museum","authors":"Line Engen","doi":"10.7577/INFORMATION.3769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As art museum education practices get more ambitious in form and content, and to a higher degree inform the overall audience strategies, the need for a research framing is required. The art museum is facing new and high expectation from society and policy makers in terms of being a relevant social and democratic platform inclusive for everyone. To manifest the changes, the institution must draw on all the different museal knowledges, not least the one about the audience. There has been a history of professional hierarchy and knowledge hegemony inside the art museum, where the object-based knowledge has trumped the practice-based. An important reason for this imbalance has been the lack of adequate practice related research methods and a theoretical framing within art museum education. Research in art museum has to a large extent operated within the classical art historical field, but more and more museums are looking to and are drawing on other models outside the museum disciplines to develop new adequate research standards. One of the museums that have undergone a profound change much due to a change in how they think about practice and research, is Tate with research leader Emily Pringle in the lead. Inspired by models within the arts and school system, they have developed a practice-led research method. In this article I will reflect on how and why it is important for art museum educators to do research on their own practice, drawing on both the Tate model and my own experience from working at the National Museum for over ten years.","PeriodicalId":50362,"journal":{"name":"Information-An International Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information-An International Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/INFORMATION.3769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As art museum education practices get more ambitious in form and content, and to a higher degree inform the overall audience strategies, the need for a research framing is required. The art museum is facing new and high expectation from society and policy makers in terms of being a relevant social and democratic platform inclusive for everyone. To manifest the changes, the institution must draw on all the different museal knowledges, not least the one about the audience. There has been a history of professional hierarchy and knowledge hegemony inside the art museum, where the object-based knowledge has trumped the practice-based. An important reason for this imbalance has been the lack of adequate practice related research methods and a theoretical framing within art museum education. Research in art museum has to a large extent operated within the classical art historical field, but more and more museums are looking to and are drawing on other models outside the museum disciplines to develop new adequate research standards. One of the museums that have undergone a profound change much due to a change in how they think about practice and research, is Tate with research leader Emily Pringle in the lead. Inspired by models within the arts and school system, they have developed a practice-led research method. In this article I will reflect on how and why it is important for art museum educators to do research on their own practice, drawing on both the Tate model and my own experience from working at the National Museum for over ten years.
艺术博物馆的实践导向研究
随着艺术博物馆教育实践在形式和内容上的野心越来越大,并在更高程度上告知整体受众策略,需要一个研究框架。美术馆正面临着社会和政策制定者对其成为一个包容所有人的相关社会和民主平台的新的、更高的期望。为了体现这些变化,该机构必须利用所有不同的博物馆知识,尤其是关于观众的知识。艺术博物馆内部一直存在着专业等级和知识霸权的历史,以实物为基础的知识压倒了以实践为基础的知识。造成这种不平衡的一个重要原因是美术馆教育缺乏与实践相关的研究方法和理论框架。艺术博物馆的研究在很大程度上是在古典艺术史领域内运作的,但越来越多的博物馆正在寻找并借鉴博物馆学科之外的其他模式,以制定新的适当的研究标准。泰特美术馆是经历了深刻变化的博物馆之一,很大程度上是由于他们对实践和研究的看法发生了变化。泰特美术馆由研究负责人艾米丽·普林格尔(Emily Pringle)领导。受到艺术和学校系统模式的启发,他们开发了一种以实践为主导的研究方法。在这篇文章中,我将借鉴泰特美术馆的模式和我自己在国家博物馆工作十多年的经验,反思艺术博物馆教育工作者如何以及为什么对自己的实践进行研究是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8.3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信