Functional Non-Inferiority Hypothesis Testing for Longitudinal Data

IF 0.3 Q4 MATHEMATICS
A. Sandie, A. Wanjoya, J. B. Tchatchueng-Mbougua
{"title":"Functional Non-Inferiority Hypothesis Testing for Longitudinal Data","authors":"A. Sandie, A. Wanjoya, J. B. Tchatchueng-Mbougua","doi":"10.3844/JMSSP.2019.208.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study pattern of non-inferiority trials is increasingly used to show the non-inferiority of new health intervention. Although in such studies the data are longitudinally collected (data held over a period of time), the conclusion of these non-inferiority trials is based on data observed at a specific time during the study period (usually at the end of the study period). In this study, we present a method that takes into account all the data observed during the study period to perform non-inferiority test. Thus, we approximate the observed data on a statistical unit by a function of time. This allows to transform the observed data on a time grid into functional data on a continuum domain. Although it could have some relevant applications, the functional data analysis for non-inferiority test has not been addressed. In this study, the functional non-inferiority hypothesis testing has been introduced. The optimal point-wise test and simultaneous confidence bands have been adapted and adopted for the purpose. The assessment of the methods has been done through simulations example. Both methods have good performances for large sample sizes. For small sample sizes, the optimal point-wise test would be too conservative while the simultaneous confidence bands based test would be a bit liberal.","PeriodicalId":41981,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/JMSSP.2019.208.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study pattern of non-inferiority trials is increasingly used to show the non-inferiority of new health intervention. Although in such studies the data are longitudinally collected (data held over a period of time), the conclusion of these non-inferiority trials is based on data observed at a specific time during the study period (usually at the end of the study period). In this study, we present a method that takes into account all the data observed during the study period to perform non-inferiority test. Thus, we approximate the observed data on a statistical unit by a function of time. This allows to transform the observed data on a time grid into functional data on a continuum domain. Although it could have some relevant applications, the functional data analysis for non-inferiority test has not been addressed. In this study, the functional non-inferiority hypothesis testing has been introduced. The optimal point-wise test and simultaneous confidence bands have been adapted and adopted for the purpose. The assessment of the methods has been done through simulations example. Both methods have good performances for large sample sizes. For small sample sizes, the optimal point-wise test would be too conservative while the simultaneous confidence bands based test would be a bit liberal.
纵向资料的功能非劣效假设检验
非劣效性试验的研究模式越来越多地用于显示新型健康干预措施的非劣效性。虽然在这些研究中,数据是纵向收集的(一段时间内的数据),但这些非劣效性试验的结论是基于研究期间特定时间(通常是在研究期结束时)观察到的数据。在本研究中,我们提出了一种考虑研究期间观察到的所有数据进行非劣效性检验的方法。因此,我们用时间的函数来近似统计单位上的观测数据。这允许将时间网格上的观测数据转换为连续域上的功能数据。非劣效性检验的功能数据分析虽然具有一定的应用价值,但尚未得到解决。在本研究中,引入了功能性非劣效假设检验。为此,采用了最佳逐点检验和同时置信带。通过仿真算例对方法进行了评价。两种方法在大样本量下都有良好的性能。对于小样本量,最佳逐点检验将过于保守,而同时基于置信带的检验将有点自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信