Accounting and information systems in Irish family SME: professionalisation effects

Martin Quinn, Peter Cleary, Catherine E. Batt, Páll Rikhardsson
{"title":"Accounting and information systems in Irish family SME: professionalisation effects","authors":"Martin Quinn, Peter Cleary, Catherine E. Batt, Páll Rikhardsson","doi":"10.24818/jamis.2021.03004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Question: Does the use of IS in family businesses differ significantly from non-family businesses? Does professionalisation of accountants positively impact the use of IS, and is there a difference between family and non-family businesses? Motivation: Research indicates family businesses have more limited implementation and use of information systems (IS) coupled with less accounting and control. As accounting is a primary user of IS, this paper explores if professionalisation of accounting may explain such reported differences in IS use. Idea: This study tests two hypotheses around IS use and professionalisation of accounting. Using a more refined measure of professionalisation of accounting than previous. Data: Data was collected from a survey of CFOs in a country with a strong family business tradition and strong professional accounting bodies. A response rate of 30% was achieved. Tools: A Mann-Witney test coupled with binary and multi-nominal regressions were used to test the hypotheses. Findings: Although professional accountants’ presence is a significant explanatory variable, the results show no significant difference in IS use between family and non-family-owned firms. However, contrary to similar studies in countries without strong professional accounting bodies, the analysis suggests that professionalisation is a significant explanatory factor in the similarities found. Contribution: By applying a more refined measure of professionalisation of accounting, this study provides a useful basis for further exploration of the professionalisation of the accounting function in family firms and links to IS use.","PeriodicalId":14716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2021.03004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Question: Does the use of IS in family businesses differ significantly from non-family businesses? Does professionalisation of accountants positively impact the use of IS, and is there a difference between family and non-family businesses? Motivation: Research indicates family businesses have more limited implementation and use of information systems (IS) coupled with less accounting and control. As accounting is a primary user of IS, this paper explores if professionalisation of accounting may explain such reported differences in IS use. Idea: This study tests two hypotheses around IS use and professionalisation of accounting. Using a more refined measure of professionalisation of accounting than previous. Data: Data was collected from a survey of CFOs in a country with a strong family business tradition and strong professional accounting bodies. A response rate of 30% was achieved. Tools: A Mann-Witney test coupled with binary and multi-nominal regressions were used to test the hypotheses. Findings: Although professional accountants’ presence is a significant explanatory variable, the results show no significant difference in IS use between family and non-family-owned firms. However, contrary to similar studies in countries without strong professional accounting bodies, the analysis suggests that professionalisation is a significant explanatory factor in the similarities found. Contribution: By applying a more refined measure of professionalisation of accounting, this study provides a useful basis for further exploration of the professionalisation of the accounting function in family firms and links to IS use.
爱尔兰家庭中小企业的会计和信息系统:专业化效应
研究问题:家族企业对信息系统的使用与非家族企业有显著差异吗?会计师的专业化是否会对信息系统的使用产生积极影响?家族企业和非家族企业之间是否存在差异?动机:研究表明,家族企业对信息系统(IS)的实施和使用较为有限,会计和控制也较少。由于会计是信息系统的主要使用者,本文探讨了会计专业化是否可以解释这种报告的信息系统使用差异。想法:这项研究测试了关于信息系统使用和会计专业化的两个假设。使用比以前更精确的会计专业化衡量标准。数据:数据收集自对一个拥有强大的家族企业传统和强大的专业会计机构的国家的首席财务官的调查。应答率达到30%。工具:采用man - witney检验结合二元和多标称回归来检验假设。研究发现:尽管专业会计师的存在是一个重要的解释变量,但结果显示,家族企业和非家族企业在信息系统使用方面没有显著差异。然而,与没有强大专业会计机构的国家的类似研究相反,分析表明专业化是发现相似性的重要解释因素。贡献:通过采用更精细的会计专业化衡量标准,本研究为进一步探索家族企业会计职能的专业化及其与信息系统使用的联系提供了有益的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信