T. Cazenave, Yen-Chi Chen, Guanting Chen, Shi-Yu Chen, Xian-Dong Chiu, J. Dehos, Maria Elsa, Qucheng Gong, Hengyuan Hu, Vasil Khalidov, Cheng-Ling Li, Hsin-I Lin, Yu-Jin Lin, Xavier Martinet, Vegard Mella, J. Rapin, Baptiste Rozière, Gabriel Synnaeve, F. Teytaud, O. Teytaud, Shi-Cheng Ye, Yi-Jun Ye, Shi-Jim Yen, Sergey Zagoruyko
{"title":"Polygames: Improved Zero Learning","authors":"T. Cazenave, Yen-Chi Chen, Guanting Chen, Shi-Yu Chen, Xian-Dong Chiu, J. Dehos, Maria Elsa, Qucheng Gong, Hengyuan Hu, Vasil Khalidov, Cheng-Ling Li, Hsin-I Lin, Yu-Jin Lin, Xavier Martinet, Vegard Mella, J. Rapin, Baptiste Rozière, Gabriel Synnaeve, F. Teytaud, O. Teytaud, Shi-Cheng Ye, Yi-Jun Ye, Shi-Jim Yen, Sergey Zagoruyko","doi":"10.3233/ICG-200157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since DeepMind’s AlphaZero, Zero learning quickly became the state-of-the-art method for many board games. It can be improved using a fully convolutional structure (no fully connected layer). Using such an architecture plus global pooling, we can create bots independent of the board size. The training can be made more robust by keeping track of the best checkpoints during the training and by training against them. Using these features, we release Polygames, our framework for Zero learning, with its library of games and its checkpoints. We won against strong humans at the game of Hex in 19 × 19, including the human player with the best ELO rank on LittleGolem; we incidentally also won against another Zero implementation, which was weaker than humans: in a discussion on LittleGolem, Hex19 was said to be intractable for zero learning. We also won in Havannah with size 8: win against the strongest player, namely Eobllor, with excellent opening moves. We also won several first places at the TAAI 2019 competitions and had positive results against strong bots in various games.","PeriodicalId":14829,"journal":{"name":"J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.","volume":"111 3S 1","pages":"244-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ICG-200157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
Abstract
Since DeepMind’s AlphaZero, Zero learning quickly became the state-of-the-art method for many board games. It can be improved using a fully convolutional structure (no fully connected layer). Using such an architecture plus global pooling, we can create bots independent of the board size. The training can be made more robust by keeping track of the best checkpoints during the training and by training against them. Using these features, we release Polygames, our framework for Zero learning, with its library of games and its checkpoints. We won against strong humans at the game of Hex in 19 × 19, including the human player with the best ELO rank on LittleGolem; we incidentally also won against another Zero implementation, which was weaker than humans: in a discussion on LittleGolem, Hex19 was said to be intractable for zero learning. We also won in Havannah with size 8: win against the strongest player, namely Eobllor, with excellent opening moves. We also won several first places at the TAAI 2019 competitions and had positive results against strong bots in various games.