The Beauty or the Beast? Unlocking Recombinant Determinants of Performance for Artistic and Functional Product Designs

E. Yılmaz, Hakan Ozalp, A. Gambardella
{"title":"The Beauty or the Beast? Unlocking Recombinant Determinants of Performance for Artistic and Functional Product Designs","authors":"E. Yılmaz, Hakan Ozalp, A. Gambardella","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3610718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Product innovation entails both technological and design innovation, yet our knowledge of determinants of innovation outcomes is limited to technological innovations. This is a significant limitation because design innovation represents an increasingly large share of total innovation activity by organizations and innovators. In this paper, we focus on two dimensions of design recombination: The number of parent designs, i.e., the number of designs that used in the creation of the focal design, and the transfer distance, i.e., the average categorical distance of parent designs to the focal design. We argue that using multiple parent designs is beneficial for functional designs and increases the likelihood that functional design is a “hit”. This outcome happens because using multiple parent designs enables designers to focus on improving a specific component or to focus on integrated functionality while using the best available components for the rest. For the artistic designs, however, transfer distance increases the likelihood that the design is a “hit”. When a designer uses design(s) from the same or similar categories, it may lead to a “design fixation” that reduces the novelty in the focal design, where novelty is a critical determinant of the success of artistic designs. Our findings, based on an online 3D printing community called Thingiverse, support our arguments. Our study has important implications for research on design innovation, recombinant innovation, and managing innovation communities.","PeriodicalId":14586,"journal":{"name":"IO: Productivity","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Productivity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3610718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Product innovation entails both technological and design innovation, yet our knowledge of determinants of innovation outcomes is limited to technological innovations. This is a significant limitation because design innovation represents an increasingly large share of total innovation activity by organizations and innovators. In this paper, we focus on two dimensions of design recombination: The number of parent designs, i.e., the number of designs that used in the creation of the focal design, and the transfer distance, i.e., the average categorical distance of parent designs to the focal design. We argue that using multiple parent designs is beneficial for functional designs and increases the likelihood that functional design is a “hit”. This outcome happens because using multiple parent designs enables designers to focus on improving a specific component or to focus on integrated functionality while using the best available components for the rest. For the artistic designs, however, transfer distance increases the likelihood that the design is a “hit”. When a designer uses design(s) from the same or similar categories, it may lead to a “design fixation” that reduces the novelty in the focal design, where novelty is a critical determinant of the success of artistic designs. Our findings, based on an online 3D printing community called Thingiverse, support our arguments. Our study has important implications for research on design innovation, recombinant innovation, and managing innovation communities.
美女还是野兽?解锁重组决定因素的性能为艺术和功能的产品设计
产品创新需要技术创新和设计创新,然而我们对创新结果决定因素的认识仅限于技术创新。这是一个重要的限制,因为设计创新在组织和创新者的总创新活动中所占的份额越来越大。在本文中,我们关注设计重组的两个维度:母设计的数量,即在焦点设计的创作中使用的设计的数量,以及传递距离,即母设计到焦点设计的平均分类距离。我们认为,使用多父设计对功能设计是有益的,并增加了功能设计成为“热门”的可能性。之所以会出现这种结果,是因为使用多个父设计使设计人员能够专注于改进特定组件或专注于集成功能,同时为其他组件使用最佳可用组件。然而,对于艺术设计来说,传递距离增加了设计成为“热门”的可能性。当设计师使用相同或类似类别的设计时,可能会导致“设计固定”,从而降低焦点设计的新颖性,而新颖性是艺术设计成功的关键决定因素。我们的发现基于一个名为Thingiverse的在线3D打印社区,支持了我们的观点。本研究对设计创新、重组创新和创新社区管理的研究具有重要的启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信