Core and Peripheral Civilizations: Voltaire's Tragic Vision and Historical Thinking in L'Orphelin de la Chine (1755)

D. Fourny
{"title":"Core and Peripheral Civilizations: Voltaire's Tragic Vision and Historical Thinking in L'Orphelin de la Chine (1755)","authors":"D. Fourny","doi":"10.1353/ecy.2020.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines Voltaire's presentation in historical and dramatic texts of what he understood as instances of the progress of \"human spirit\" across world history, expressed as periods of confrontation between civilized (core) and barbarian (peripheral) spaces. One of the author's later tragedies, L'Orphelin de la Chine (1755), serves as a case study to illustrate how Voltaire creatively rendered this core/periphery dynamic by transporting it to a place of influence and power beyond Europe, that is, beyond the period's more typical, orientalist depictions of western and non-western confrontation to a purely non-western space. Voltaire inscribed confrontation within the play's two communities of barbarian (Mongol) and civilized (imperial China) peoples of the East and the values their respective worlds embodied. Moreover, Voltaire problematized this dynamic by destabilizing the hierarchy of values, elevating those of the periphery to the center or core and creating a liminal space within the conflict where core and periphery seem to meld into a new locus of cultural assimilation and/or appropriation. In concluding remarks, by briefly exploring China's historical record of conquest and assimilation during two important periods (medieval and early modern), we discover that Voltaire's formulation of a core/periphery civilizing dynamic may have unknowingly confirmed the historical record.","PeriodicalId":82853,"journal":{"name":"Studies on Voltaire and the eighteenth century","volume":"49 1","pages":"45 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies on Voltaire and the eighteenth century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecy.2020.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article examines Voltaire's presentation in historical and dramatic texts of what he understood as instances of the progress of "human spirit" across world history, expressed as periods of confrontation between civilized (core) and barbarian (peripheral) spaces. One of the author's later tragedies, L'Orphelin de la Chine (1755), serves as a case study to illustrate how Voltaire creatively rendered this core/periphery dynamic by transporting it to a place of influence and power beyond Europe, that is, beyond the period's more typical, orientalist depictions of western and non-western confrontation to a purely non-western space. Voltaire inscribed confrontation within the play's two communities of barbarian (Mongol) and civilized (imperial China) peoples of the East and the values their respective worlds embodied. Moreover, Voltaire problematized this dynamic by destabilizing the hierarchy of values, elevating those of the periphery to the center or core and creating a liminal space within the conflict where core and periphery seem to meld into a new locus of cultural assimilation and/or appropriation. In concluding remarks, by briefly exploring China's historical record of conquest and assimilation during two important periods (medieval and early modern), we discover that Voltaire's formulation of a core/periphery civilizing dynamic may have unknowingly confirmed the historical record.
核心文明与边缘文明:伏尔泰在《中国孤儿》(1755)中的悲剧视野与历史思考
摘要:本文考察了伏尔泰在历史和戏剧文本中的表现,即他所理解的“人类精神”在世界历史上的进步实例,表现为文明(核心)和野蛮(外围)空间之间的对抗时期。作者后来的悲剧之一,《中国孤儿》(1755),作为一个案例,说明了伏尔泰如何创造性地将这种核心/边缘动态地呈现出来,通过将其转移到欧洲以外的一个有影响力和权力的地方,也就是说,超越了那个时期更典型的东方主义对西方和非西方对抗的描绘,进入一个纯粹的非西方空间。伏尔泰在剧中刻画了东方两个野蛮民族(蒙古)和文明民族(帝制中国)的对抗,以及他们各自世界所体现的价值观。此外,伏尔泰通过破坏价值等级的稳定,将边缘提升到中心或核心,并在冲突中创造一个有限的空间,使核心和边缘似乎融合成一个新的文化同化和/或挪用的场所,从而使这种动态问题化。在结束语中,通过简要探讨中国在两个重要时期(中世纪和近代早期)的征服和同化历史记录,我们发现伏尔泰关于核心/边缘文明动态的表述可能在不知情况下证实了这一历史记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书