How adopters’ and foster carers’ perceptions of ‘family’ affect communicative openness in post-adoption contact interactions

F. Macleod, Lesley Storey, T. Rushe, M. Kavanagh, Francis Agnew, K. McLaughlin
{"title":"How adopters’ and foster carers’ perceptions of ‘family’ affect communicative openness in post-adoption contact interactions","authors":"F. Macleod, Lesley Storey, T. Rushe, M. Kavanagh, Francis Agnew, K. McLaughlin","doi":"10.1177/03085759211060715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the constructions of communicative openness following adoption. Data from three waves of interviews with six adoptive mothers and four foster carers were collected, transcribed verbatim and analysed in keeping with a social constructivist grounded theory methodology. The results show that the way ‘family’ is constructed can both facilitate and impede communicative openness. Those who hold a fluid, child-centred concept of family, are willing to construct it as different and can accept the ebb and flow of family membership intuitively and view such openness as a natural part of caring for children. Those with a more traditional, nuclear construction of family may associate adoption with fear, a sense of biological related competition and the need to control the controllable, all of which act as barriers to communicative openness. The study demonstrates that communicative openness is person and context sensitive and emphasises the need to think creatively and flexibly about the very nature of family.","PeriodicalId":92743,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & fostering","volume":"83 1","pages":"430 - 441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & fostering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759211060715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the constructions of communicative openness following adoption. Data from three waves of interviews with six adoptive mothers and four foster carers were collected, transcribed verbatim and analysed in keeping with a social constructivist grounded theory methodology. The results show that the way ‘family’ is constructed can both facilitate and impede communicative openness. Those who hold a fluid, child-centred concept of family, are willing to construct it as different and can accept the ebb and flow of family membership intuitively and view such openness as a natural part of caring for children. Those with a more traditional, nuclear construction of family may associate adoption with fear, a sense of biological related competition and the need to control the controllable, all of which act as barriers to communicative openness. The study demonstrates that communicative openness is person and context sensitive and emphasises the need to think creatively and flexibly about the very nature of family.
收养者和寄养者对“家庭”的看法如何影响收养后接触互动中的沟通开放性
本文探讨收养后交际开放性的结构。研究人员收集了对6名养母和4名寄养者进行的三次访谈的数据,逐字记录,并根据社会建构主义理论方法进行了分析。结果表明,“家庭”的构建方式既可以促进也可以阻碍交流的开放性。那些持有流动的、以儿童为中心的家庭概念的人,愿意将家庭构建为不同的,能够直观地接受家庭成员的消长和流动,并将这种开放性视为照顾儿童的自然组成部分。那些拥有更传统的核心家庭结构的人可能会将收养与恐惧、与生物相关的竞争感和控制可控事物的需要联系在一起,所有这些都是交流开放的障碍。该研究表明,沟通的开放性是对个人和环境敏感的,并强调需要创造性地、灵活地思考家庭的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信