The Rejection of Benjamin's Habilitation

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Ralph Shain
{"title":"The Rejection of Benjamin's Habilitation","authors":"Ralph Shain","doi":"10.1353/cul.2022.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the rejection of Benjamin's thesis by his habilitation committee at Frankfurt University. The published views (Wohlfarth and Haverkampf) are considered, and both are rejected. Then an alternative view is offered that draws some conclusions as to lessons for the critique of academic institutions. These lessons involve metaphilosophical considerations raised by Benjamin relating to the episode, specifically those regarding questions of communication and \"the problem of presentation\" in philosophy.","PeriodicalId":46410,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Critique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Critique","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2022.0035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article examines the rejection of Benjamin's thesis by his habilitation committee at Frankfurt University. The published views (Wohlfarth and Haverkampf) are considered, and both are rejected. Then an alternative view is offered that draws some conclusions as to lessons for the critique of academic institutions. These lessons involve metaphilosophical considerations raised by Benjamin relating to the episode, specifically those regarding questions of communication and "the problem of presentation" in philosophy.
对本雅明适居论的否定
摘要:本文考察了法兰克福大学康复委员会对本雅明论文的否定。考虑了已发表的观点(Wohlfarth和Haverkampf),两者都被拒绝了。然后,提出了另一种观点,得出了一些结论,作为对学术机构的批判的教训。这些课程涉及本雅明提出的关于这一事件的哲学思考,特别是关于哲学中的交流问题和“呈现问题”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cultural Critique
Cultural Critique Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Cultural Critique provides a forum for international and interdisciplinary explorations of intellectual controversies, trends, and issues in culture, theory, and politics. Emphasizing critique rather than criticism, the journal draws on the diverse and conflictual approaches of Marxism, feminism, psychoanalysis, semiotics, political economy, and hermeneutics to offer readings in society and its transformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信