Development of an ethical roadmap

C. Craig, Jayne Wallace, Kyle Montague, Nantia Koulidou, H. Fisher, Luís P. Carvalho, L. Groot, Julie Trueman, S. Lawson, K. Morrissey, Trevor Duncan, Josh South
{"title":"Development of an ethical roadmap","authors":"C. Craig, Jayne Wallace, Kyle Montague, Nantia Koulidou, H. Fisher, Luís P. Carvalho, L. Groot, Julie Trueman, S. Lawson, K. Morrissey, Trevor Duncan, Josh South","doi":"10.1080/24735132.2021.1908653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ethics are a system of moral principles and branch of knowledge enquiry defining what is good for individuals and society. Academic disciplines operate within publicly defined ethical parameters created to support researchers through complex dilemmas. However, paradigms in interdisciplinary research, a growing focus on emancipatory and participatory methods and questions relating to an ethic of technology call for a rethinking of existing frameworks that are largely predicated on bioethics. This paper describes an enquiry that used a design-lens through which to explore existing ethical frameworks operating in health. An Ethical Roadmap resource was created in response to issues and questions raised during the enquiry. We suggest that the Roadmap creates the space for discourse, discussion and a level of rehearsal as potential ethical dilemmas are encountered and responses are worked through. The process potentially enables a reflective and reflexive process that may build self-awareness of how researcher values may manifest themselves in particular contexts and from the different disciplinary backgrounds of members within a team. We describe the Ethical Roadmap as ‘becoming’ rather than ‘finite’ and as a solid starting point from which researchers can develop the resource offering further, through use, introducing the open source version of the Roadmap.","PeriodicalId":92348,"journal":{"name":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","volume":"84 1","pages":"140 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2021.1908653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Ethics are a system of moral principles and branch of knowledge enquiry defining what is good for individuals and society. Academic disciplines operate within publicly defined ethical parameters created to support researchers through complex dilemmas. However, paradigms in interdisciplinary research, a growing focus on emancipatory and participatory methods and questions relating to an ethic of technology call for a rethinking of existing frameworks that are largely predicated on bioethics. This paper describes an enquiry that used a design-lens through which to explore existing ethical frameworks operating in health. An Ethical Roadmap resource was created in response to issues and questions raised during the enquiry. We suggest that the Roadmap creates the space for discourse, discussion and a level of rehearsal as potential ethical dilemmas are encountered and responses are worked through. The process potentially enables a reflective and reflexive process that may build self-awareness of how researcher values may manifest themselves in particular contexts and from the different disciplinary backgrounds of members within a team. We describe the Ethical Roadmap as ‘becoming’ rather than ‘finite’ and as a solid starting point from which researchers can develop the resource offering further, through use, introducing the open source version of the Roadmap.
制定道德路线图
伦理学是一套道德原则体系,是定义什么对个人和社会有益的知识探究的一个分支。学术学科在公共定义的伦理参数内运作,这些参数是为了支持研究人员克服复杂的困境而创建的。然而,跨学科研究的范例、对解放和参与性方法的日益关注以及与技术伦理有关的问题要求对主要以生物伦理为基础的现有框架进行重新思考。本文描述了一项调查,该调查使用了设计透镜,通过该透镜探索在健康领域运作的现有伦理框架。针对调查过程中提出的问题,我们编制了道德路线图资源。我们建议在遇到潜在的道德困境和应对措施时,路线图为话语、讨论和演练创造空间。这个过程可能会使一个反思和反身的过程,可以建立自我意识,了解研究人员的价值观如何在特定的背景下和团队成员的不同学科背景下表现出来。我们将道德路线图描述为“变得”而不是“有限”,并且作为一个坚实的起点,研究人员可以通过使用进一步开发资源提供,引入路线图的开源版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信